Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2007.23.3.221

An Assessment of Urbanization Using Historic Satellite Photography: Columbus Metropolitan Area, Ohio, 1965  

Kim, Kee-Tae (Vexcel Corporation)
Kim, Jung-Hwan (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University)
Jayakumar, S. (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University)
Sohn, Hong-Gyoo (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.23, no.3, 2007 , pp. 221-227 More about this Journal
Abstract
We present an analysis of urban development and growth with reconnaissance satellite photographs of Columbus metropolitan area acquired by the Corona program in 1965. A two-dimensional polynomial linear transformation was used to rectify the photos against United State Geological Survey (USGS) Large-scale Digital Line Graph (DLG) data georeferenced to Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates. The boundaries of the Columbus metropolitan area were extracted from the rectified Corona image mosaic using a Bayesian approach to image segmentation. The inferred 1965 urban boundaries were compared with 1976 USGS Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) data and boundaries derived from 1988 and 1994 Landsat TM images. The urban area in and around Columbus approximately doubled from 1965 to 1994 (${\sim}110%$) along with population growth from 1960 to 1998 (${\sim}50%$). Most of the urban expansion results from development of residential units.
Keywords
Corona; Columbus; Urban sprawl; Landuse changes;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Buchanan, J. T. and W. Acevedo, 1997. Defining the temporal and geographic limits for an urban mapping study, Proc. Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, Toronto, Canada
2 Wheelon, A. D., 1997. Corona: The first reconnaissance satellites, Physics Today, February, pp.24-30
3 Bell, C, W. Acevedo, and J. T. Buchanan, 1995. Dynamic mapping of urban regions: growth of the San Francisco Sacramento region, Proc. Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, San Antonio, TX, pp.723-734
4 U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, and Bureau of The Census, 1997. $TIGER/Line^{\circledR}$ File, [machinereadable data files] prepared by the Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC
5 CNES and SPOT IMAGE, 1988. SPOT User's Handbook, ed.1, [on-line], Available: http://www.spot.com/home/news/publi/SHRM3-00.pdf
6 U.S. Geological Survey, 1990. Digital line graph standards, National Mapping Program Standards, [on-line], Available: http://rockyweb.cr.usgs.gov/nmpstds/dlgstds.html
7 Sharp, J. S. and V. Winland, 1999. Rural and nonmetropolitan population change in Ohio, 1950 to 1998, [on-line], Available: http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~dataunit
8 U.S. Census Bureau, 1998. Alternative approaches to defining metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, Federal Register, [on-line], Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/msa.pdf
9 Anderson, J. R., E. E. Hardy, J. T. Roach, and R. E. Witmer, 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data, U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 964, Washington, DC, 35p
10 NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, 1998. Landsat 7 Science Data Users Handbook, prepared by Landsat Project Science Office, [on-line], Available: http://ltpwww.gsfc.nasa.gov/IAS/handbook/handbook_toc.html
11 Davies, E., 1990. Machine Vision: Theory, Algorithm, Practicalities, 2nd Ed., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp.19-39
12 U.S. Geological Survey, 1999. Analyzing land use changes in urban environments, USGS Fact Sheet 188-99, [on-line], Available: http://edcdgs9.cr.usgs.gov/urban/factsht.pdf
13 Macdonald, R. A., 1995. Corona: Success for space reconnaissance, A look into the cold war and a revolution in intelligence, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 61(6): 321-325