Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2006.22.5.337

Neighborhood Correlation Image Analysis for Change Detection Using Different Spatial Resolution Imagery  

Im, Jung-Ho (Center for GIS and Remote Sensing,Department of Geography, University of South Carolina)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.22, no.5, 2006 , pp. 337-350 More about this Journal
Abstract
The characteristics of neighborhood correlation images for change detection were explored at different spatial resolution scales. Bi-temporal QuickBird datasets of Las Vegas, NV were used for the high spatial resolution image analysis, while bi-temporal Landsat $TM/ETM^{+}$ datasets of Suwon, South Korea were used for the mid spatial resolution analysis. The neighborhood correlation images consisting of three variables (correlation, slope, and intercept) were evaluated and compared between the two scales for change detection. The neighborhood correlation images created using the Landsat datasets resulted in somewhat different patterns from those using the QuickBird high spatial resolution imagery due to several reasons such as the impact of mixed pixels. Then, automated binary change detection was also performed using the single and multiple neighborhood correlation image variables for both spatial resolution image scales.
Keywords
change detection; neighborhood correlation images; automated calibration model; spatial resolution;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chan, J. C., K. Chan, and A. G. Yeh, 2001. Detecting the nature of change in an urban environment: a comparison of machine learning algorithms. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 67(2): 213-225
2 Du, Y., P. M. Teillet, and J. Cihlar, 2002. Radiometric normalization of multitemporal high-resolution satellite images with quality control for land cover change detection. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82: 123-134   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Im, J. and J. R. Jensen, 2005. A change detection model based on neighborhood correlation image analysis and decision tree classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 99: 326-340   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Im, J., 2006. A Remote Sensing Change Detection System Based on Neighborhood/Object Correlation Image Analysis, Expert Systems, and an Automated Calibration Model, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina
5 Jensen, J. R. and D. L. Toll, 1982. Detecting residential land use development at the urban fringe. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 48: 629-643
6 Johnson, R. D. and E. S. Kasischke, 1998. Change vector analysis: a technique for the multispectral monitoring of land cover and condition. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(3): 411-426   DOI
7 Lu, D., P. Mausel, E. Brondizio, and E. Moran, 2004. Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12): 2365-2407   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ridd, M. K. and J. Liu, 1998. A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 63: 95-100   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Chavez, P. S. JR and D. J. Machinnon, 1994. Automatic detection of vegetation changes in the southwestern United States using remotely sensed images. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60: 571-583
10 Jensen, J. R., 2005. Introductory Digital Image Processing: a Remote Sensing Perspective 3rd. Upper Saddle River, NY: Prentice Hall
11 Collins, J. B. and C. E. Woodcock, 1996. An assessment of several linear change detection techniques for mapping forest mortality using multitemporal Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 56: 66-77   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Im, J., J. Rhee, J. R. Jensen, and M. E. Hodgson, 2006a. An automated binary change detection model using a calibration approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, in press
13 Jensen, J. R., E. W. Ramsay, H. E. Mackey, E. J. Christensen, and R. P. Sharitz, 1987. Inland wetland change detection using aircraft MSS data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 53: 521-529
14 Song, C., C. E. Woodcock, K. C. Seto, M. P. Lenney, and S. A. Macomber, 2001. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: when and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sensing of Environment, 75: 230-244   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Im, J., J. R. Jensen, and J. A. Tullis, 2006b. Objectbased change detection using correlation image analysis and image segmentation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, in press
16 Jensen, J. R., K. Rutchey, M. Koch, and S. Narumalani, 1995. Inland wetland change detection in the Everglades Water Conservation Area 2A using a time series of normalized remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 61(2): 199-209
17 Walter, V., 2004. Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 58: 225-238   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Markham, B. and J. L. Barker, 1986. Landsat MSS and TM post-calibration dynamic ranges, exoatmospheric reflectances and at-satellite temperatures. EOSAT Technical Notes, 1:3-8
19 Michalek, J. L., T. W. Wagner, J. J. Luczkovich, and R. W. Stoffle, 1993. Multispectral change vector analysis for monitoring coastal marine environments. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 59(3): 381-384
20 Dai, X. L. and S. Khorram, 1999. Remotely sensed change detection based on artificial neural networks. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(10): 1187-1194
21 Metternicht, G., 2001. Assessing temporal and spatial change of salinity using fuzzy logic, remote sensing and GIS, foundations of an expert system. Ecological Modeling, 144: 163-179   DOI   ScienceOn
22 NASA, 2006. Landsat 7 Science Data Users Handbook, Chapter 11 - Data Products. http://ltpwww.gsfc.nasa.gov/IAS/handbook/h andbook_htmls/chapter11/chapter11.html.?Last visited June 10, 2006