Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2005.21.5.383

Improving Urban Vegetation Classification by Including Height Information Derived from High-Spatial Resolution Stereo Imagery  

Myeong, Soo-Jeong (Program in Environmental and Resource Engineering SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.21, no.5, 2005 , pp. 383-392 More about this Journal
Abstract
Vegetation classes, especially grass and tree classes, are often confused in classification when conventional spectral pattern recognition techniques are used to classify urban areas. This paper reports on a study to improve the classification results by using an automated process of considering height information in separating urban vegetation classes, specifically tree and grass, using three-band, high-spatial resolution, digital aerial imagery. Height information was derived photogrammetrically from stereo pair imagery using cross correlation image matching to estimate differential parallax for vegetation pixels. A threshold value of differential parallax was used to assess whether the original class was correct. The average increase in overall accuracy for three test stereo pairs was $7.8\%$, and detailed examination showed that pixels reclassified as grass improved the overall accuracy more than pixels reclassified as tree. Visual examination and statistical accuracy assessment of four test areas showed improvement in vegetation classification with the increase in accuracy ranging from $3.7\%\;to\;18.1\%$. Vegetation classification can, in fact, be improved by adding height information to the classification procedure.
Keywords
High-spatial resolution imagery; stereo pair; image matching; parallax; height information; urban vegetation classification;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Stehman, S., 1999. Basic probability sampling designs for thematic map accuracy assessment, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(12): 2423-2441   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Toth, C. and A. Krupnik, 1994. Experiences with automatic image patch matching. Proc. of the ASPRS/ACSM Annual Conference, Reno, NY, April 25-28, 1: 644-651
3 Zhang, Y., 2001. Texture-integrated classification of urban treed areas in high-resolution colorinfrared imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67(12): 1359-1365
4 Gruen, A. W., 1985. Adaptive least squares correlation: a powerful image matching technique, J. of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Cartography, 14(3): 175-187
5 Kreyszig, E., 1979. Introductory Mathematical Statistics: Principles and Methods, John Wiley, New York, 470 p
6 Lillesand, T. M. and R. W. Kiefer, 2000. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York
7 Stehman, S., 1995. Thematic map accuracy assessment from the perspective of finite population sampling, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16(3): 589-593   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ryherd, S. and C. Woodcock, 1996. Combining spectral and texture data in the segmentation of remotely sensed images, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62(2): 181-194
9 Myeong, S., D. J. Nowak, P. F. Hopkins, and R. J. Brock, 2003. Urban cover classification using digital, high-spatial resolution aerial imagery, Urban Ecosystems, 5: 243-256   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Emerge, 2003. www.emergeweb.com
11 Gruen, A. W. and E. P. Baltsavias, 1988. Geometrically Constrained Multiphoto Matching, Photogrammeteric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54(5): 633-641
12 Heipke, C, 1992. A Global Approach for least-squares image matching and surface reconstruction in object space, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58(3): 317-323
13 Berberoglu, S., Llyoid, C. D., Atkinson, P. M., and P. J. Curran, 2000. The integration of spectral and textural information using neural networks for land cover mapping in the Mediterranean, Computers and Geoscience, 26: 385-396   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Saleh, R. and F. L. Scarpace, 1995. Multidimensional matching techniques for stereophotogrammetric mapping, Proc. of the ASPRS/ACSM Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC. Feb 27 - Mar 2,1995. Vol 2, 450-452
15 Wolf, P. R., 1983. Elements of Photogrammetry. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York
16 Schenk, T., 1999. Digital Photogrammetery, TerraScience. Laurelville, OH
17 Avery, T. E, 1977. Interpretation of Aerial Photographs. 3rd Ed. Burgess publishing company, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 52 p
18 Rosenholm, D., 1987. Multi-Point Matching using the Least-Squares technique for evaluation of three-dimensional models, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53(6): 621626
19 Wolf, P. R. and B. A., DeWitt, 2000. Elements of Photogrammetry with Applications in GIS. 3rd Ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York
20 Stefanov, W. L., M. S. Ramsey, and P. R. Christensen, 2001. Monitoring urban land cover change an expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers, Remote Sensing of Environment, 77: 173-185   DOI   ScienceOn