Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2005.21.3.189

Application of Multispectral Remotely Sensed Imagery for the Characterization of Complex Coastal Wetland Ecosystems of southern India: A Special Emphasis on Comparing Soft and Hard Classification Methods  

Shanmugam, Palanisamy (Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute)
Ahn, Yu-Hwan (Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute)
Sanjeevi , Shanmugam (Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.21, no.3, 2005 , pp. 189-211 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper makes an effort to compare the recently evolved soft classification method based on Linear Spectral Mixture Modeling (LSMM) with the traditional hard classification methods based on Iterative Self-Organizing Data Analysis (ISODATA) and Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) algorithms in order to achieve appropriate results for mapping, monitoring and preserving valuable coastal wetland ecosystems of southern India using Indian Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS) 1C/1D LISS-III and Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper image data. ISODATA and MLC methods were attempted on these satellite image data to produce maps of 5, 10, 15 and 20 wetland classes for each of three contrast coastal wetland sites, Pitchavaram, Vedaranniyam and Rameswaram. The accuracy of the derived classes was assessed with the simplest descriptive statistic technique called overall accuracy and a discrete multivariate technique called KAPPA accuracy. ISODATA classification resulted in maps with poor accuracy compared to MLC classification that produced maps with improved accuracy. However, there was a systematic decrease in overall accuracy and KAPPA accuracy, when more number of classes was derived from IRS-1C/1D and Landsat-5 TM imagery by ISODATA and MLC. There were two principal factors for the decreased classification accuracy, namely spectral overlapping/confusion and inadequate spatial resolution of the sensors. Compared to the former, the limited instantaneous field of view (IFOV) of these sensors caused occurrence of number of mixture pixels (mixels) in the image and its effect on the classification process was a major problem to deriving accurate wetland cover types, in spite of the increasing spatial resolution of new generation Earth Observation Sensors (EOS). In order to improve the classification accuracy, a soft classification method based on Linear Spectral Mixture Modeling (LSMM) was described to calculate the spectral mixture and classify IRS-1C/1D LISS-III and Landsat-5 TM Imagery. This method considered number of reflectance end-members that form the scene spectra, followed by the determination of their nature and finally the decomposition of the spectra into their endmembers. To evaluate the LSMM areal estimates, resulted fractional end-members were compared with normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), ground truth data, as well as those estimates derived from the traditional hard classifier (MLC). The findings revealed that NDVI values and vegetation fractions were positively correlated ($r^2$= 0.96, 0.95 and 0.92 for Rameswaram, Vedaranniyam and Pitchavaram respectively) and NDVI and soil fraction values were negatively correlated ($r^2$ =0.53, 0.39 and 0.13), indicating the reliability of the sub-pixel classification. Comparing with ground truth data, the precision of LSMM for deriving moisture fraction was 92% and 96% for soil fraction. The LSMM in general would seem well suited to locating small wetland habitats which occurred as sub-pixel inclusions, and to representing continuous gradations between different habitat types.
Keywords
IRS-1C/1D LISS-III; Landsat-5 TM; LSMM; Hard and soft classification; Wetlands; Southern India;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bowman, R. A., W. D. Guenzi, and D. J. Savory, 1991. Spectroscopic method for estimation of soil organic carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55: 563-566   DOI
2 Duncan, J., D. Stow., J. Franklin, and A. Hope, 1993. Assessing the relationship between spectral vegetation indices and shrub cover in the Jornada Basin, New Mexico. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14: 3395-3416   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Foody G. M. and D. P. Cox, 1994. Sub-pixel land cover composition estimation using a Linear Mixture Modelling and Fuzzy membership functions. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 5(3): 619-631
4 Green, E. P., P. J. Mumby., A. J. Edwards, and C. D. Clark, 1996. A review of remote sensing for the assessment and management of tropical coastal resources. Coastal Management, 21: 1-40
5 Jensen J. R., 1996. Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective (2nd edition), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
6 Lillesand T. M. and R. W. Kiefer, 1994. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. John Wiley and Sons, New York
7 Mas, J. F. and I. Ramirez, 1996. Comparison of land use classification obtained by visual interpretation and digital processing. ITC Journal, 3-4: 278- 283
8 Mather P. M., 1987. Computer processing of remotely sensed images. An introduction. Wiley and Sons, London
9 McGwire, K., T. Minor, and L. Fenstermaker, 2000. Hyperspectral mixture modeling for quantifying sparse vegetation cover in arid environments. Remote Sensing of Environment, 72: 360-374   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Selvam, V., 2003. Environmental classification of mangrove wetlands of India. Current Science, 84(6): 757-765
11 Settle J. J. and N. A. Drake, 1993. Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(6): 1159-1177   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Thom, B. G., 1984. Mangrove ecosystem: research methods. UNESCO, Paris, pp.3-17
13 Zhu, Z. and D. L. Evans, 1994. U.S. Forest types and predicted percent forest cover from AVHRR data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60: 525-531
14 Dicks E. and H. C. Lo, 1990. Evaluation of thematic map accuracy in a land-use and land-cover mapping program. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56(9): 1247-1252
15 Asner, G. P. and K. B. Heidebrecht, 2002. Spectral unmixing of vegetation, soil and dry carbon cover in arid regions. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(19): 3939-3958   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Bolstad, P. V. and T. M. Lillesand, 1991. Rapid maximum likelihood classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57: 67-74
17 Franklin, E., 1994. Discrimination of subalphine forest species and canopy density using digital CASI, SPOT PLA and Landsat-TM data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(10): 233-1241
18 Smith, M. G., T. Spencer., A. L. Murray, and J. R. French, 1998. Assessing seasonal vegetation change in coastal wetlands with airborne remote sensing: an outline methodology. Mangroves and Salt Marshes, 2: 15-28   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Ramachandran S., S. Sundaramurthy., R. Krishnamoorthy., J. Devasenapathy, and M. Thanikachalam, 1998. Application of remote sensing and GIS to coastal wetland ecology of Tamil Nadu and Andaman and Nicobar group of islands with special reference to mangroves. Current Science, 75(3): 236-244
20 Bastin L., 1997. Comparison of fuzzy c-means classification, Linear mixture modelling and MLC probabilities as tool for unmixing coarse pixels. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(17): 3629-3648   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Martin, L. R. G., 1989. Accuracy assessment of Landsat based visual change detection methods applied to the rural-urban fringe. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55: 209-215
22 Garcia-Haro F. J., M.A. Gilabert, and J. Mela, 1996. Linear spectral mixture modeling to estimate vegetation amount from optical spectral data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17: 3373-3400   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Rainey, M. P., A. N. Tyler., D. J. Gilvear., R. G. Bryant, and P. McDonald, 2003. Mapping intertidal estuarine sediment grain size distributions through airborne remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86: 480-490   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Pu, R., B. Xu, and P. Gong, 2003. Oakwood crown closure estimation by unmixing Landsat TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(22): 4433-4445
25 Andrew J., F. John., J. Sara, and B. David, 2000. Quantifying vegetation change in semiarid environments: Precision and accuracy of Spectral Mixture Modeling and the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index. Remote Sensing of Environment, 73: 87-102   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Quarmby N. A., J. R. G., Settle, and K. H. White, 1992. Linear mixture modeling of multitemporal AVHRR data for crop area estimation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13(3): 415-425   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Asner P. and B. Lobell, 2000. A biogeophysical approach for automated SWIR unmixing of soils and vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 74: 99-112   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Ramsey W., A. Nelson., K. Sapkota., C. Laine, and S. Krasznay, 1999. Using multiple-polarization Lband radar to monitor marsh burn recovery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37(1): 635-639   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Roberts D. A., M. Gardner., R. Churn., S. Ustin, and G. Scheer, 1997. Mapping chaparral in the Santa Monica mountains using multiple end-member spectral mixture models. Remote Sensing of Environment, 65: 267-279
30 Congalton, G., 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37: 35-46   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Ustin, S. L., Q. J. Hart., L. Duan, and G. Scheer, 1996. Vegetation mapping on hardwood rangelands in California. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17: 3015-3036   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Thomson, A. G., R. M. Fuller., T. H. Sparks., M. G. Yates, and J. Eastwood, 1998. Ground and airborne radiometry over intertidal surfaces: Waveband selection for cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19: 1189-1205   DOI
33 Swain P. H. and S. M. Davis, 1978. Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach. McGrau-Hill, New York
34 Fisher P. F. and S. Pathirana, 1990. The evaluation of fuzzy membership of land cover classes in the suburban zone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 34: 121-132   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Shanmugam, P., 2002. Multisensor image analysis and sub-pixel classification for improved coastal mapping. Ph.D Thesis, Anna University, Chennai, India
36 Asner, G. P., 1998. Biophysical and biogeochemical sources of variability in canopy reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment, 64: 234-253   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Chavez, P. S., 1988. An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 24: 459-479   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Hummel, J. W., K. A. Sudduth, and S. E. Hollinger, 2001. Soil moisture and organic matter prediction of surface and subsurface soils using an NIR soil sensor. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 32: 149-165   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Roberts, D. A., M. O. Smith, and J. B. Adams, 1993. Green vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 44: 255-269   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Cochrane, M. A. and C. M. Souza, 1998. Linear mixture model classification of burned forests in the eastern Amazon. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19: 3433-3440   DOI   ScienceOn
41 MSSRF, 1995. Pitchavaram mangroves. M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, India, p.10-11
42 Carlson, T. N. and D. A. Ripley, 1997. On the relationship between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index. Remote Sensing of Environment, 62: 241-252   DOI   ScienceOn