Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2004.20.5.289

New Methods for Correcting the Atmospheric Effects in Landsat Imagery over Turbid (Case-2) Waters  

Ahn Yu-Hwan (Satellite Ocean Research Laboratory Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute)
Shanmugam P. (Satellite Ocean Research Laboratory Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.20, no.5, 2004 , pp. 289-305 More about this Journal
Abstract
Atmospheric correction of Landsat Visible and Near Infrared imagery (VIS/NIR) over aquatic environment is more demanding than over land because the signal from the water column is small and it carries immense information about biogeochemical variables in the ocean. This paper introduces two methods, a modified dark-pixel substraction technique (path--extraction) and our spectral shape matching method (SSMM), for the correction of the atmospheric effects in the Landsat VIS/NIR imagery in relation to the retrieval of meaningful information about the ocean color, especially from Case-2 waters (Morel and Prieur, 1977) around Korean peninsula. The results of these methods are compared with the classical atmospheric correction approaches based on the 6S radiative transfer model and standard SeaWiFS atmospheric algorithm. The atmospheric correction scheme using 6S radiative transfer code assumes a standard atmosphere with constant aerosol loading and a uniform, Lambertian surface, while the path-extraction assumes that the total radiance (L/sub TOA/) of a pixel of the black ocean (referred by Antoine and Morel, 1999) in a given image is considered as the path signal, which remains constant over, at least, the sub scene of Landsat VIS/NIR imagery. The assumption of SSMM is nearly similar, but it extracts the path signal from the L/sub TOA/ by matching-up the in-situ data of water-leaving radiance, for typical clear and turbid waters, and extrapolate it to be the spatially homogeneous contribution of the scattered signal after complex interaction of light with atmospheric aerosols and Raleigh particles, and direct reflection of light on the sea surface. The overall shape and magnitude of radiance or reflectance spectra of the atmospherically corrected Landsat VIS/NIR imagery by SSMM appears to have good agreement with the in-situ spectra collected for clear and turbid waters, while path-extraction over turbid waters though often reproduces in-situ spectra, but yields significant errors for clear waters due to the invalid assumption of zero water-leaving radiance for the black ocean pixels. Because of the standard atmosphere with constant aerosols and models adopted in 6S radiative transfer code, a large error is possible between the retrieved and in-situ spectra. The efficiency of spectral shape matching has also been explored, using SeaWiFS imagery for turbid waters and compared with that of the standard SeaWiFS atmospheric correction algorithm, which falls in highly turbid waters, due to the assumption that values of water-leaving radiance in the two NIR bands are negligible to enable retrieval of aerosol reflectance in the correction of ocean color imagery. Validation suggests that accurate the retrieval of water-leaving radiance is not feasible with the invalid assumption of the classical algorithms, but is feasible with SSMM.
Keywords
Atmospheric Correction; Spectral Shape Matching Method; Landsat-TM; SeaWiFS; Case-2 water;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hall, F. G., D .E. Strebel., J. E. Nickeson, and S. J. Goetz, 1991. Radiometric rectification: Toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images, Remote Sensing of Environment, 35: 11-27
2 Land, P. E. and J. D. Haigh, 1996. Atmospheric correction over Case-2 waters with an iterative fitting algorithm, Applied Optics, 35: 5443-5451
3 Ruddick, K. G., F. Ovidio, and M. Rijkeboer, 2000. Atmospheric correction of SeaWiFS imagery for turbid and inland waters, Applied Optics, 39: 897-913
4 Santer, R., V. Carrere., P. Dubuisson, and J.C. Roger, 1999. Atmospheric correction over land for MERIS, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20: 1819-1840
5 Siegel, D. A., M. Wang., S. Moritorena, and W. Robinson, 2000. Atmospheric correction of satellite ocean color imagery: the black pixel assumption, Applied Optics, 39: 3582-3591
6 Vermote, E. F., D. Tanre.,J. L. Deuze., M. Herman, and J. J. Morcrette, 1997. Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum, AN overview, IEEE Transactions on Geoscoence and Remote Sensing, 35:675-686
7 Antoine, D. and A. Morel, 1999. A multiple scattering algorithm for atmospheric correction of remotely sensed ocean color (MERIS instrument): principle and implementation for atmospheres carrying various aerosols including absorbing ones, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20: 1875-1916
8 Richter R., 1996. A spatially adaptive fast atmospheric correction algorithm, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17: 1201-1214
9 Liang, S., H. Fang, and M. Chen, 2001. Atmospheric correction of Landsat ETM+ land surface imagery-Part 1: Methods, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39: 2490-2498
10 Gordon, H. R., 1978. Removal of atmospheric effects from satellite imagery of the oceans, Applied Optics, 17: 1631-1636
11 Ahn Y. H. and P. Shanmugam, 2004. Analysis of suninduced chlorophyll fluorescence in relation to remote estimation of chlorophyll a concentration in ocean waters, Submitted to the Journal of Plankton Research
12 Morel, A. and L. Prieur, 1977. Analysis of variations in ocean color, Limnology and Oceanography, 22: 709-722
13 Brivio, P. A., C. Giardiano, and E. Zilioli, 2001. Determination of concentration changes in Lake Garda using image-based radiative transfer code for Landsat TM images, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22:487-502
14 Gordon, H. R. and M. Wang, 1994. Retrieval of water-leaving radiance and aerosol optical thickness over the oceans with SeaWiFS: a preliminary algorithm, Applied Optics, 33:443-452
15 Hooker, S. B., E. R. Firestone, and J. G. Acker, 1994. SeaWiFS Pre-launch Radiometric Calibration and Spectral Characterization. SeaWiFS technical report series , NASA Technical Memorandum 104566, Vol. 23
16 McClatchey, R. A., R.W. Fenn., J. E. Selby., F. E. Volz, and J. S. Garing 1971.Optical properties of the atmosphere (revised), AFCRL 71-0279 , Environmental Research Paper 354, Bedforf, MA, USA
17 Tanre, D., P. Y. Deschamps., C. Devaux, and M. Herman, 1998. Estimation of Saharan aerosol optical thickness from blurring effects in Thematic Mapper data, Journal of Geophysical Research, 93: 15955-15964
18 Popp, T., 1995. Correcting atmosphere masking to retrieve the spectral albedo of land surface from satellite measurements, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16: 3483-3508
19 Gower, J. F. R. and G., A. Borstad, 1990. Mapping of phytoplankton by solar solar-stimulated fluorescence using an imaging spectrometer, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 11: 313-320   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Kaufman, Y. J., A. Karnieli, and D. Tame, 2000. Detection of dust over deserts using satellite data in the solar wavelengths, IEEE Transactions of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38:525-531
21 Chavez, P., 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections-Revisted and improved, Photgrammetry Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62: 1025-1036
22 Austin, R. W., 1980. Gulf of Mexico, ocean-color surface-truth measurements, Boundary Layer Meteorology, 18: 269-285