1 |
Uttal, D. H., Scudder, K. V., & DeLoache, J. S. (1997). Manipulatives as symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18, 37-54.
DOI
|
2 |
Welling, C. (2011). Is it daxing? The effect of learning formats on preschoolers' acquisition of novel dynamic relations. Honors research thesis. Ohio State University.
|
3 |
Petersen, L. A., & McNeil, N. M. (2008). Using perceptually rich objects to help children represent number: Established knowledge counts. In V. Sloutsky, B. Love, & K. McRae (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1567- 1572). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
4 |
Quinn, P. C. (1994). The categorization of above and below spatial relations by young infants. Child Development, 65, 58-69.
DOI
|
5 |
Quinn, P. C., Adams, A., Kennedy, E., Shettler, L., & Wasnik, A. (2003). Development of an abstract category representation for the spatial relation between in 6- to 10-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39, 151-163.
DOI
|
6 |
Quinn, P. C., Cummins, M., Kase, J., Martin, E., & Weissman, S. (1996). Development of categorical representations for above and below spatial relations in 3- to 7-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 32, 942- 950.
DOI
|
7 |
Quinn, P. C., Polly, J., Furer, M., Dobson, V., & Narter, D. (2002). Young infants' performance in the object-variation version of the abovebelow categorization task: A result of perceptual distraction or conceptual limitation? Infancy, 3, 323-347.
DOI
|
8 |
Son, J. Y., Smith, L., & Goldstone, R. (2011). Connecting instances to promote children's relational reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 260-277.
DOI
|
9 |
Rattermann, M. J., Gentner, D., & DeLoache, J. (1990). The effects of familiar labels on young children's performance in an analogical mapping task. In Proceedings of the 12th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp.22-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
|
10 |
Son, J. Y., Smith, L., & Goldstone, R. (2008). Simplicity and generalization: Short-cutting abstraction in children's object categorizations. Cognition, 108, 626-638.
DOI
|
11 |
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83-121.
DOI
|
12 |
Cohen, L. B., Atkinson, D. J., & Chaput, H. H. (2004). Habit X: A new program for testing infant perception and cognition [Computer software]. Austin, the University of Texas.
|
13 |
Gava, L., Valenza, E., & Turati, C. (2009). Newborns' perception of left-right spatial relations. Child Development, 80, 1797-1810.
DOI
|
14 |
Kaminski, J. A., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2010). Concreteness and relational matching in preschoolers. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXXII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 335-340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
15 |
Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2006). Do children need concrete instantiations to learn an abstract concept? In R. Sun and N. Miyake (Eds.). Proceedings of the XXVIII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 411-416).
|
16 |
Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2008). The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science, 320, 454-455.
DOI
|
17 |
Park, Y., & Casasola, M. (in preparation). Do objects matter for infants' formation of a spatial category?
|
18 |
Maguire, M., Hirsh-Pasek, Golinkoff, R. (2008). Focusing on the relation: Fewer exemplars facilitate children's initial verb learning and extension. Developmental Science, 11, 628- 634.
DOI
|
19 |
McDonough, L., Choi, S., & Mandler, J. (2003). Understanding spatial relations: Flexible infants, lexical adults. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 229-259.
DOI
|
20 |
Paik, J. H., & Mix, K. (2006). Preschoolers' use of surface similarity in object comparisons: Taking context into account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 194-214.
DOI
|
21 |
Amaya, M., Uttal, D. H., O'Doherty, K. D., Liu, L. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (2008). Two-Digit Subtraction: Examining the link between concrete and abstract representations of knowledge. Manuscript under revision.
|
22 |
Behl-Chadha, G., & Eimas, P. D. (1995). Infant categorization of left-right spatial relations. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 69-79.
DOI
|
23 |
Casasola, M. (2005). When less is more: How infants learn to form an abstract categorical representation of support. Child Development, 76, 279-290.
DOI
|
24 |
Casasola, M., & Park, Y. (in press). Developmental changes in infant spatial categorization: When more is best and when less is enough. Child Development.
|
25 |
Casasola, M. (2008). The development of infants' spatial categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 21-25.
DOI
|
26 |
Casasola, M., & Cohen, L. B. (2002). Infant categorization of containment, support, and tight-fit spatial relationships. Developmental Science, 5, 247-264.
DOI
|
27 |
Casasola, M., Cohen, L. B., & Chiarello, E. (2003). Six-month-old infants' categorization of containment spatial relations. Child Development, 74, 679-693.
DOI
|
28 |
Choi, S. (2006). Influence of language-specific input on spatial cognition: Categories of containment. First Language, 26, 207-232.
DOI
|