Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5723/kjcs.2017.38.3.75

Multiple Task Performance and Psychological Refractory Period in Children: Focusing on PRP Paradigm Tasks  

Kim, Bokyung (Department of Child Development and Family Studies, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University)
Yi, Soon Hyung (Department of Child Development and Family Studies, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Child Studies / v.38, no.3, 2017 , pp. 75-90 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify children's cognitive processing and performance characteristics while multiple task performance. It confirmed whether their multiple task performance and psychological refractory period (PRP) varied by task condition (stimulus onset asynchrony [SOA] and task difficulty) and stimulus modality. Methods: Seventy 5-year-olds were recruited. Multi-task tools were developed using the E-prime software. The children were required to respond to two stimuli (visual or auditory) presented with microscopic time difference and their response times (RTs) were recorded. Results: As the SOA increased, the RTs in the first task increased, while the RTs in the second task and PRP decreased. The RTs of the first and second tasks, and the PRP for difficult tasks, were significantly longer than those for easy tasks were. Additionally, there was an interaction effect between the SOA and task difficulty. Although there was no main effect of stimulus modality, task difficulty moderated the modality effect. In the high difficulty condition, the RTs of the first and second tasks and PRP for the visual-visual task were significantly longer than those for auditory-auditory task were. Conclusion: These results inform theoretical discussions on children's multi-task mechanism, and the loss of multiple task performance. Additionally, they provide practical implications and information on the composition of multi-tasks suitable for children in educational environments.
Keywords
multile task performance; psychological refractory period; task difficulty; stimulus onset asynchrony; stimulus modality;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Williams, J., Rickert, V., Hogan, J., Zolten, A. J., Satz, P., D'Elia, L. F., . . . Light, R. (1995). Children's color trails. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10(3), 211-223. doi:10.1093/ arclin/10.3.211   DOI
2 Zelazo, P. D., & Carlson, S. M. (2012). Hot and cool executive function in childhood and adolescence: Development and plasticity. Child Development Perspectives, 6(4), 354-360. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00246.x   DOI
3 Krumbholz, K., Patterson, R. D., Nobbe, A., & Fastl, H. (2003). Microsecond temporal resolution in monaural hearing without spectral cues? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(5), 2790-2800. doi:10.1121/1.1547438   DOI
4 Lague-Beauvais, M., Gagnon, C., Castonguay, N., & Bherer, L. (2013). Individual differences effects on the psychological refractory period. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 368. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-368   DOI
5 Leonard, J. A. (1959). Tactual choice reactions: I. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(2), 76-83. doi:10.1080/17470215908416294   DOI
6 Leshowitz, B. (1971). Measurement of the two-click threshold. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2B), 462- 466. doi:10.1121/1.1912374   DOI
7 Lien, M. C., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 212-238. doi:10.3758/BF03196277   DOI
8 McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the singlechannel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(2), 471-484. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.471   DOI
9 Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108(2), 393-434. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.393   DOI
10 Luc iana, M. , & Ne l son, C. (2002) . Assessment of neuropsychological function through use of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery: Performance in 4- to 12-year-old children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 22(3), 595-624. doi:10.1207/S15326942DN2203_3   DOI
11 Kee, D. W., & Davies, L. (1988). Mental effort and elaboration: A development analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13(3), 221-228. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(88)90022-7   DOI
12 Birch, L. L. (1976). Age trends in children's time-sharing performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22(2), 331-345. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(76)90013-8   DOI
13 Arnell, K. M., & Duncan, J. (2002). Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection. Cognitive Psychology, 44(2), 105-147. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0762   DOI
14 Badwe, N., Patil, K. B., Yelam, S. B., Vikhe, B. B., & Vatve, M. S. (2012). A comparative study of hand reaction time to visual stimuli in students of 1st MBBS of a rural medical college. Pravara Medical Review, 4(1), 4-6.
15 Becker, D. E., Miao, A., Duncan, R., & McClelland, M. M. (2014). Behavioral self-regulation and executive function both predict visuomotor skills and early academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 411-424. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.04.014   DOI
16 Besner, D., Reynolds, M., & O’Malley, S. (2009). When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: Evidence from psycholinguistics. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(11), 2222-2234. doi:10.1080/17470210902 747187   DOI
17 Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., & Becic, E. (2005). Training effects on dual-task performance: Are there age-related differences in plasticity of attentional control? Psychology and Aging, 20(4), 695- 709. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.695   DOI
18 Bjorklund, D. F., & Hamishfeger, K. K. (1987). Developmental differences in the mental effort requirements for the use of an organizational strategy in free recall. Journal of Experimental Child Ps ycholog y, 44(1), 109-125. doi:10.1016/0022- 0965(87)90025-7   DOI
19 Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task Interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220-244. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220   DOI
20 Mioni, G., Grondin, S., Forgione, M., Fracasso, V., Mapelli, D., & Stablum, F. (2016). The role of primary auditory and visual cortices in temporal processing: A tDCS approach. Behavioural Brain Research, 313, 151-157. doi:10.1016/ j.bbr.2016.07.019   DOI
21 Rammsayer, T. H. (2014). The effects of type of interval, sensory modality, base duration, and psychophysical task on the discrimination of brief time intervals. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(4), 1185-1196. doi:10.3758/s13414- 014-0655-x   DOI
22 Buhner, M., König, C. J., Pick, M., & Krumm, S. (2006). Working memory dimensions as differential predictors of the speed and error aspect of multitasking performance. Human Performance, 19(3), 253-275. doi:10.1207/ s15327043hup1903_4   DOI
23 Bogartz, R. S. (1976). On the meaning of statistical interactions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22(1), 178-183. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(76)90099-0   DOI
24 Brisson, B., & Jolicoeur, P. (2007). Cross-modal multitasking processing deficits prior to the central bottleneck revealed by event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3038- 3053. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.022   DOI
25 Bruce, V., Green, P. R., & Georgeson, M. A. (1996). Visual perception: Physiology, psychology, and ecology (3rd ed.). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
26 Casey, B. J., Galvan, A., & Hare, T. (2005). Changes in cerebral functional organization during cognitive development. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 239-244. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.012   DOI
27 Colom, R., Martínez-Molina, A., Shih, P. C., & Santacreu, J. (2010). Intelligence, working memory, and multitasking performance. Intelligence, 38(6), 543-551. doi:10.1016/ j.intell.2010.08.002   DOI
28 Courage, M. L., Bakhtiar, A., Fitzpatrick, C., Kenny, S., & Brandeau, K. (2015). Growing up multitasking: The costs and benefits for cognitive development. Developmental Review, 35, 5-41. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.002   DOI
29 Welford, A. T. (1952). The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high speed performance: A review and theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43(1), 2-19. doi:10.1111/ j.2044-8295.1952.tb00322.x
30 Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 905-921. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.905   DOI
31 Chung, C.-H., & Kim, A.-S. (1991). The effects of inter-stimulus intervals and number of alternatives on psychological refractory period. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology, 2(1), 3-12.
32 Hong, S. H. (2005). Difference in information processing capacity by age and sex of elementary and middle school students (Master's thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=T10699483
33 Koo, H. J., & Shin, M. S. (2008). A standardization study of children’s color trails test (CCTT). Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(1), 28-37.
34 Park, G. (2002). Effects of the inter-stimulus intervals and the athletic experience on psychological refractory period (Master's thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9957822
35 Grondin, S., Roussel, M. E., Gamache, P. L., Roy, M., & Ouellet, B. (2005). The structure of sensory events and the accuracy of time judgments. Perception, 34(1), 45-58. doi:10.1068/ p5369   DOI
36 Fischer, R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Deep thinking increases taskset shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance. Cognition, 123(2), 303-307. doi:10.1016/ j.cognition.2011.11.015   DOI
37 Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 31-60. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31   DOI
38 Park, G., & Lee, K.-H. (2003). Effects of the inter-stimulus intervals and the athletic experience on psychological refractory period. Korean Journal of Sports Science, 12(2), 245-254. Retrieved from http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/ NODE00828370
39 Song, E.-S. (1995). Effects of the length of inter-stimulus intervals, number of stimulus-response alternatives, sport experience and sex on the psychological refractory period. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology, 6(2), 1-16.
40 Ghirardelli, T. G., & Scharine, A. A. (2009). Auditory-visual interactions. In C. E. Rash, M. B. Russo, T. Letowski, & E. Schmeisser (Eds.), Helmet-mounted displays: Sensation, perception and cognition issues (pp. 599-618). Ft. Rucker, AL: US Army Aeromedical Research Lab.
41 Halford, G. S., Maybery, M. T., & Bain, J. D. (1986). Capacity limitations in children’s reasoning: A dual-task approach. Child Development, 57(3), 616-627. doi:10.2307/1130340   DOI
42 Hibberd, D. L., Jamson, S. L., & Carsten, O. M. J. (2010). Managing in-vehicle distractions: Evidence from the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 4-11. doi:10.1145/1969773.1969775
43 Hibberd, D. L., Jamson, S. L., & Carsten, O. M. J. (2013). Mitigating the effects of in-vehicle distractions through use of the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 1096-1103. doi:10.1016/ j.aap.2012.08.016   DOI
44 Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2014). Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling responsefrom goal-conflict in dual-task performance. Cognition, 132(1), 30-43. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.001   DOI
45 Holtzer, R., Stern, Y., & Rakitin, B. C. (2005). Predicting agerelated dual-task effects with individual differences on neuropsychological tests. Neuropsychology, 19(1), 18-27. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.1.18   DOI
46 Irwin-Chase, H., & Burns, B. (2000). Developmental changes in children’s abilities to share and allocate attention in a dual task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77(1), 61-85. doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2557   DOI