Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5723/KJCS.2015.36.4.229

An Investigation into 2, 4 Year Old Children's Nonsymbolic Arithmetic Ability According to Task Difficulty  

Cho, Woo Mi (Seoul National University)
Yi, Soon-Hyung (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Child Studies / v.36, no.4, 2015 , pp. 229-242 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate young children's nonsymbolic arithmetic ability according to task difficulty. The participants in this study comprised 43 2-year-old children and 48 4-year-old children recruited from 5 childcare centers located in Seoul, Korea. All tasks were composed of comparison, addition, subtraction, multiplication and division tasks. In addition, each arithmetic task varied with the ratio of the two quantities; low level(1:2), middle level(2:3), high level(4:5). The results revealed that 2 & 4-year-old children could perform a large numerical range of nonsymbolic arithmetic tasks without influences from previously learned mathematics. This finding suggests that children have a degree of numerical capacity prior to symbolic mathematics instruction. Furthermore, children's performance on nonsymbolic arithmetic tasks indicated the ratio signature of large approximate numerical representation. This result implies that large approximate numerical representation can be used in arithmetical manipulations.
Keywords
nonsymbolic arithmetic ability; development of numerical representation ability; task difficulty;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Antell, S. E., & Keating, D. P. (1983). Perception of numerical invariance in neonates. Child Depression, 54, 695-701.
2 Barrouillet, P., Mignon, M., & Thevenot, C. (2008). Strategies in subtraction problem solving in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99(4), 233-251.   DOI
3 Barth, H., Beckmann, L., & Spelke, E. S. (2008). Nonsymbolic, approximate arithmetic in children: Abstract addition prior to instruction. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1466-1477.   DOI
4 Barth, H., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). The construction of large number representation in adults. Cognition. 86, 201-221.   DOI
5 Barth, H., La Mont, K., Lipton, J., & Spelke, E. (2005). Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 14116-14121.   DOI
6 Barth, H., Dehaene, S., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E. (2006). Non-Symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children. Cognition, 98, 199-222.   DOI
7 Brannon, E., Abbott, S., & Lutz, D. (2004). Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancy. Cognition, 93, B59-B68.   DOI
8 Clearfield, M. W., & Mix, K. S. (1999). Number versus contour length in infant's discrimination of small visual sets. Psychological Science, 10, 408-411.   DOI
9 Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). Origins number sense: large number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science. 15, 396-401.
10 Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Discrimination of large and small numerosities by human infants. Infancy, 5(3), 271-290.   DOI
11 Mix, K. S., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (1996). Do preschool children recognize auditoryvisual numerical correspondences? Child Development, 67, 1592-1608.   DOI
12 Mix, K. S., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (2002). Quantitative development in infancy and early childhood. New York: Oxford University Press.
13 Piaget, J. (1965). The child's conception of number. New York: Norton.
14 Starkey, P. (1992). The early development of numerical reasoning. Cognition, 43, 93-126.   DOI
15 Starkey, P. & Cooper, R. G., Jr. (1980). Perception of numbers by human infants. Science, 210, 1033-1035.   DOI
16 Starkey, P., Spelke, E. S., & Gelman, R. (1990). Numerical abstraction by human infants. Cognition, 36, 97-127.   DOI
17 Strauss, M. S., & Curtis, L. E. (1981). Infant perception of numerosity. Child development, 52, 1146-1152.   DOI
18 Strauss, M. S., & Curtis, L. E. (1984). Development of numerical concepts in infancy. In C. Sopian (Ed.), Origins of cognitive skills. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19 Wood, J. N., & Spelke, E. S. (2005). Infants' enumeration of actions: numerical discrimination and its signature limits. Developmental science, 173-181.
20 Wynn, K. (1992a) Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358. 749-750.   DOI
21 Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. (2002). The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes. Psychological Science, 13(2), 150-156.   DOI
22 Cooper, R. G., Jr. (1984). Early number development: Discovering number space with addition and subtraction. In C. Sopian (Ed.), Origins of cognitive skills: The eighteenth annual Carnegie simposium on cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23 Cordes, S., Gelman, R., Gallistel, C. R., & Whalen, J. (2001) Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 698-707.   DOI
24 Crollen, V., Castronovo, J., & Seron, X. (2011). Under- and over-Estimation. Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 39-49.   DOI
25 Geary, D. C. (1994). Children's mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26 Gelman, R. (2000). Domain specificity and variability in cognitive development. Child Development, 71, 854-856.   DOI
27 Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28 Ginsburg, H. P. (1982). The development of addition in the contexts of culture, social class, and race. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. A. Rpmberg (Eds.), Addtion and subtraction; A cognitive perspective (pp. 191-210). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
29 Jordan, N.C., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (1994) Assessing early arithmetic abilities: Effects of verbal and nonverbal response types on the calculation performance of middle-and low-income children. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 413-432.   DOI
30 Xu, F. (2003). Numerosity discrimination in infants: evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition, 89, B15-B25.   DOI