Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5293/kfma.2013.16.4.005

A Study on Performance Characteristics of Wetted-type Multi Path Ultrasonic Flowmeter  

Lee, Dong-Keun (K-water Institute, Korea Water Resources Corporation)
Cho, Yong (K-water Institute, Korea Water Resources Corporation)
Ko, Jae-Myoung (K-water Institute, Korea Water Resources Corporation)
Park, Tae-Jin (K-water Institute, Korea Water Resources Corporation)
Park, Jong-Ho (Dept. of Mechanical Eng., Chungnam National University)
Publication Information
Abstract
An experimental investigation has been carried out in order to evaluate characteristics of wetted-type multi-path ultrasonic flowmeters. The multi-path ultrasonic flowmeters were installed at various entrance and exit locations for several cases of pipe fitting(straight, $90^{\circ}$ double elbow) and valve(gate valve, butterfly valve). We measured the flow-rate at each location. The measurement data of test flowmeter were compared with the measured data of reference flowmeter. The uncertainties of reference flowmeter and test flowmeter are 0.3 %, 0.4 %, respectively. The results demonstrate the effects of flowmeter location as well as the measurement errors in flow rate. The distance between the flow disturbance factor and a flowmeter was an important element of the test.
Keywords
Wetted-type multi path ultrasonic flow meter; Flow-rate error; $90^{\circ}$ double elbow pipe; Gate valve; Butterfly valve;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Drenthen, J. G. and de Boer, G., 2001, "The Manufacturing of Ultrasonic Gas Flow Meters," Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 12, pp. 89-99.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Park, K. A., Choi, Y. M., Choi, H. M., Yoon, B. R., and Hwang, K. B., 1999, "Installation Effects on the Characteristics of Multi-path Ultrasonic Flowmeter," Proceedings of the KFMA Annual Meeting, pp. 114-117.
3 Hwang, S. Y., Seo, K. H., Kim, B. C., Kim, K. S., and Tyan, H. S, 2000, "Installation Effects on the Characteristics of Multi-path Ultrasonic Flowmeter with Valve," Proceedings of the KFMA Annual Meeting, pp. 65-74.
4 Carlander, C. and Delsing, J. 2000, "Installation Effects on an Ultrasonic Flow Meter with Implications for Self Diagnostics," Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 11. pp. 109-122.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Yeh, T. T. and Mattingly, G. E., 1997, "Computer Simulations of Ultrasonic Flow Meter Performance in Ideal and Non-ideal Pipeflows," ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, pp. 1-6.
6 Ruppel. C. and Peter. F., 2004, "Effects of Upstream Installation on the Reading of an Ultrasonic Flowmeter," Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 15, pp. 166-177.
7 Berrebi, J., 2004, "Ultrasonic Flow Metering Errors Due to Pulsating Flow," Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 15, pp. 179-185.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Xiong, W., 2003, "Velocity and Turbulence Measurements Downstream of Flow Conditioners," Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol 14, pp. 249-260.   DOI   ScienceOn