Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15682/jkiha.2019.25.1.51

Comparative Review of Design Guidelines of Hospice Facilities for Establishing Standards  

Lee, Sukyung (Department of Architecture, Dong Seoul University)
Yoon, Hungjin (Department of Architecture, Dong Seoul University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture / v.25, no.1, 2019 , pp. 51-60 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to analyze design guidelines for hospice facilities in the US, UK, and Canada focused on design considerations and space requirements, and utilizes them as baseline data for establishing standards for Korean hospice facilities. Methods: Comparative review was carried out to investigate hospice care models, design consideration, and room sizes and requirements for design guideline of hospice facilities in United States, UK and Canada identified on electronic database and review articles, and to examine major characteristics and tendencies of hospice facilities. Results: The hospice care models characteristics in design guidelines is generally largely divided into hospital-based hospice facility, Nursing home-based hospice facility, and daycare hospice. The design considerations in hospice facilities focused on medical efficiency, flexibility, barrier-free environment, person-centered care, and stability. There is also a need for single resident room, rooms for the patient's family, and isolation room for infection control. Implications: it is recommended to establish standards for the installation and operation of required and recommended rooms and considerations when establishing the standards of hospice facilities in Korea. This Study is limited to a simple comparative analysis of the framework of guideline.
Keywords
Hospice Facility; Palliative Care Unit; U.S.; U.K.; Canada; Design Standards; Guidelines;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Council, T. W. s. H. Women and cancer in Ireland, 1994-2001: The Women's Health Council.
2 The Economist Intelligence Unit, (2015). The 2015 Quality of Death Index.
3 Children, D. o. H. (2001). Report of the National Advisory Committee on Palliative care. In. Dublin: Department of Health & Children.
4 Children, D. o. H. (2005). Desgin Guidelines for Specialist Palliative Care Settings. In. Dublin: Department of Health & Children.
5 Institute, F. G. (2014). Guidelines for Design and Construction of Hospitals & Outpatient Facilities. In.
6 Institute, F. G. (2018). Guidelines for Design and Construction of Residential Health, Care, and Support Facilities. In.
7 McGann, S. (2011). Spatial practices and the home as hospice. The Australasian medical journal, 4(9), 495-499. doi:10.4066/AMJ.2011.931   DOI
8 Ontario. (2017). Hospie Capital Program Design Standards.
9 Verderber, S. (2014). Residential Hospice Environments: Evidence-Based Architectural and Landscape Design Considerations. Journal of Palliative Care, 30(2), 69-82. doi:10.1177/082585971403000202   DOI
10 김준석. (2004). 우리나라 호스피스․ 완화의료의 현주소와 전망. 대한내과학회지, 67(4), 327-329.
11 박중철, & 최윤선. (2009). 노인환자를 위한 호스피스,완화의료. 대한임상노인의학회지, 10, 345-351.
12 호스피스.완화의료 및 임종과정에 있는 환자의 연명의료결정에 관한 법률 시행규칙 [별표 1]호스피스전문기관의 지정기준, 제20조제1항 관련 C.F.R. (2017. 8. 4.).
13 보건복지부. (2018a). 2018 가정형호스피스 시범사업 서비스 및 지원사업 안내. In.
14 보건복지부. (2018b). 2018 말기환자 호스피스전문기관 지정 및 지원사업 안내. In.
15 보건복지부. (2018c). 2018 자문형호스피스 시범사업 서비스 및 지원사업 안내. In.
16 장윤정. (2015). 노인과 호스피스 완화의료. 보건복지포럼, 38-47.
17 정미렴. (2016). 병원기반 (병동형/가정형) 호스피스의 환경계획지침에 대한 연구. J한국주거학회 학술대회논문집, 28(2), 105-105.
18 정미렴. (2018). 호스피스의 전개과정과 1980-2009 년대 호스피스 시설의 공간구성 특징에 관한 사례연구. 대한건축학회 논문집-계획계, 34(11), 3-12.
19 최영순, 최정규. 태윤희, 김지윤, 김정덕. (2014). 호스피스 완화의료의 활성화방안.