Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2012.14.1.039

Relationships between Cellulose Decomposition and Soil Environmental Factors in Three Coniferous Plantations  

Kim, Choon-Sig (Department of Forest Resources, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology / v.14, no.1, 2012 , pp. 39-44 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was carried out to determine the relationships between cellulose decomposition and soil environmental factors in larch (Larix leptolepis) and pine (red pine: Pinus densiflora; rigitaeda pine: P. rigida ${\times}$ P. taeda) species planted in the same year (1963). The variation of cellulose mass loss with soil temperature, soil pH, soil $CO_2$ efflux rates, and soil water content was measured monthly for 4 months (July, August, September and October 2006) from three coniferous plantations. Mean mass loss rates during the study period were generally more rapid in rigitaeda pine (6.5 $mg\;g^{-1}\;day^{-1}$) than in red pine (6.2 $mg\;g^{-1}\;day^{-1}$) or larch (6.1 $mg\;g^{-1}\;day^{-1}$) plantations, although the mass loss rates were not significantly different among three tree species (P > 0.05). Cellulose mass loss rates among three tree species were positively correlated with soil temperature (red pine: r = 0.77, P < 0.05; rigitaeda pine: r = 0.59, P < 0.05; larch: r = 0.48, P < 0.05) at the 20 cm soil depth, while the mass loss rates were negatively correlated with soil pH (red pine: r = -0.63, P < 0.05; rigitaeda pine: r = -0.47, P < 0.05; larch: r = -0.43, P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between cellulose mass loss and soil $CO_2$ efflux rates except for regitaeda pine plantation, while no significant correlation (P > 0.05) between cellulose mass loss and soil water content in larch or rigitaeda pine. The results suggest that cellulose mass loss rates in soil layers depend on the different soil environmental factors caused by tree species.
Keywords
Cellulose degradation; Red pine; Soil water content; Soil pH; Soil respiration;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Neher, D. A., M. E. Barbercheck, S. M. El-Allaf, and O. Anas., 2003: Effects of disturbance and ecosystem on decomposition. Applied Soil Ecology 23,165-179.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 SAS Institute Inc., 2003: SAS/STAT Statistical Software. Version 9.1 SAS publishing Cary, NC.
3 Thibodeau, L., P. Raymond, C. Camire, and A. Munson., 2000: Impact of precommercial thinning in balsam fir stands on soil nitrogen dynamics, microbial biomass, decomposition, and foliar nutrition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30, 229-238.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Trumbore, S., 2000: Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecological Applications 10, 399-401.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Wickland, K. P., J. C. Neff, and J. W. Harden., 2010: The role of soil drainage class in carbon dioxide exchange and decomposition in boreal black spruce (Picea mariana) forest stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 40, 2123-2134.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Binkley, D., 1984: Does forest removal increase rates of decomposition and nitrogen release? Forest Ecology and Management 8, 229-233.   DOI
7 Bowden, R. D., K. J. Nadelhoffer, R. D. Boone, J. M. Melillo, and J. B. Garrison., 1993: Contributions of aboveground litter, belowground litter, and root respiration to total soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23, 1402-1407.   DOI
8 Brown, A. H. F. and G. Howson., 1988: Changes in tensile strength loss of cotton strips with season and soil depth under 4 tree species. Cotton strip assay: an index of decomposition in soils. A. F. Harrison, P. M. Latter, and D. W. H. Walton (Eds.), Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Grange-Over Sands, Cumbria, UK, 86-89.
9 Donnelly, P. K., J. A. Entry, D. L. Crawford, and K. Jr. Cromack., 1990: Cellulose and lignin degradation in forest soils: Response to moisture, temperature and acidity. Microbial Ecology 20, 289-295.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Drewnik, M., 2006: The effect of environmental conditions on the decomposition rate of cellulose in mountain soils. Geoderma 132, 116-130.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kim, C., 2000: Canopy cover effects on cellulose decomposition in oak and pine stands. Journal of Forest Research 5, 145-149.   DOI
12 Beyer, L., 1992: Cellulolytic activity of Luvisols and Podzols under forest and arable land using the "Cellulosetest" according to Unger. Pedobiologia 36, 137-145.
13 Kim, C., H. C. An, and J. K. Byun., 2010a: Cellulose decomposition rates in clear-cut and uncut red pine (Pinus densiflora S.et Z.) stands. Forest Science and Technology 6, 29-34.   DOI
14 Kim, C., J. Jeong, H. S. Cho, and Y. Son., 2010b: Carbon and nitrogen status of litterfall, litter decomposition and soil in even-aged larch, red pine and rigitaeda pine plantations. Journal of Plant Research 123, 403-409.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Lee, K.-H., and S. Jose., 2003: Soil respiration, fine root production, and microbial biomass in cottonwood and loblolly pine plantations along a nitrogen fertilization gradient. Forest Ecology and Management 185, 263-273.   DOI   ScienceOn