Browse > Article

Runoff of Diazinon and Metolachlor by Rainfall Simulation and from Soybean Field Lysimeter  

Kim, Chan-Sub (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Adminstration)
Lee, Byung-Moo (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Adminstration)
Park, Byung-Jun (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Adminstration)
Jung, Pil-Kyun (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Adminstration)
Choi, Ju-Hyeon (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Adminstration)
Ryu, Gab-Hee (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Adminstration)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Pesticide Science / v.10, no.4, 2006 , pp. 279-288 More about this Journal
Abstract
Three different experiments were undertaken to investigate the runoff and erosion loss of diazinon and metolachlor from sloped-field by rainfall. The mobility of two pesticides and which phase they were transported by were examined in adsorption study, the influence of rainfall pattern and slope degree on the pesticide losses were evaluated in simulated rainfall study, and the pesticide losses from soybean field comparing with bare soil were measured in field lysimeter study. Freundlich adsorption parameter (K) ranged $1.6{\sim}2.0$ for metolachlor and $4.0{\sim}5.5$ for diazinon. The K values of pesticides by the desorption method were higher than those ones by the adsorption method. Another parameter (1/n) in Freundlich equation for the pesticides tested ranged $0.96{\sim}1.02$ by desorption method and $0.87{\sim}1.02$ by adsorption method. By the SSLRC's classification for pesticide mobility of diazinon and metolachlor were classified as moderately mobile ($75{\leq}Koc$ <500). Runoff and erosion losses of pesticides by three rainfall scenarios were $0.5{\sim}1.0%$ and $0.1{\sim}0.7%$ for metolachlor and $0.1{\sim}0.6%$ and $0.1{\sim}0.2%$ for diazinon. Distribution of pesticides in soil polite were investigated after the simulated rainfall events. Metolachlor was leached to $10{\sim}15$ cm soil layer and diazinon was leached to $5{\sim}10$ cm soil layer. Losses of each pesticide in the 30% of sloping degree treatment were $0.2{\sim}1.9$ times higher than those ones in the 10% of sloping degree treatment. Pesticide losses from a series of lysimeter plots in sloped land by rainfall ranged $1.0{\sim}3.1%$ for metolachlor and $0.23{\sim}0.50%$ for diazinon, and were $1/3{\sim}2.5$ times to the ones in the simulated rainfall study. The erosion rates of pesticides from soybean-plots were $21{\sim}75%$ lower than the ones from bare soil plots. The peak runoff concentration in soybean-plots and bare soil plots were $1{\sim}9{\mu}gL^{-1}$ and $3{\sim}16{\mu}gL^{-1}$ for diazinon, $7{\sim}31{\mu}gL^{-1}$ and $5{\sim}40{\mu}gL^{-1}$ for metolachlor, respectively.
Keywords
runoff; erosion; adsorption; diazinon; metolachlor;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Gustafson, D. I. (1989) Groundwater ubiquity score: A simple method for assessing pesticide leachability, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 8:339-357   DOI
2 OECD (1993) Test guideline 106 Adsorption/desorption, In DECD guidelines for testing of chemicals
3 US EPA (1994) Sediment and adsorption isotherm, In Code of federal regulation 40 part 790 to end, pp.157-161
4 U.S. EPA (2004) Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision for diazinon, U.S. EPA Doc. No. 738-R-04-006
5 Wischmeier, W. H. and D. D, Smith. (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses - A guide to conservation planning, USDA Agriculture Handbook No.537
6 김성수, 김태한, 이상민, 박동식, Zhu Yong-Zhe, 김성문, 허장현 (2005a) 실내 인공강우를 이용한 강원도 고랭지 토양의 토성 및 경사도별 농약 이동특성, 한국농약과학회지 9(4):316-329   과학기술학회마을
7 김찬섭, 박병준, 임양빈, 류갑희 (2005b) 유기인계 및 카바메이트계 농약의 토양흡착성과 간이선발모형을 이용한 용탈 잠재성 평가, 한국환경농학회지 24(4): 341-349   과학기술학회마을   DOI
8 한국작물보호협회 (2006b) 농약연보
9 McCall, P. J., R. L, Swann., D. A, Laskowski., S. M, Unger., S. A, Vrana and H. J, Dishburger. (1980). Estimation of chemical mobility in soil from liquid chromatographic retention times, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 24:190-195   DOI
10 김균, 김정한, 박창규 (1997) 강우에 의한 농약의 표면유출 특성, 한국환경농학회지 16(3):274-284
11 FOCUS (2004) FOCUS surface water scenarios in the ED evaluation process under 91/414/EEC
12 European Food Safety Authority (2006) Conclusion on the peer review of diazinon, Appendix 1 - list of endpoints
13 Leonard, R. A. (1990) Movement of pesticides into surface waters, In Pesticides in the soil environment: processes, impacts and modeling, H. H. Cheng, (Ed.), Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. pp.303-349
14 한국작물보호협회 (2006a) 농약사용지침서
15 Jarvis, N. J., J. M, Hollis., P. H, Nicholls., T Mayer. and Evans, S. P. (1997) MACRO_DB : A decisionsupport tool for assessing pesticide fate and mobility in soils, Environmental Modelling & Software 12:251-265   DOI   ScienceOn
16 U.S. EPA (1995) Reregistration Eligibility Decision for metolachlor, U.S. EPA Doc. No. 738-R-95-006
17 김찬섭, 임양빈, 이희동, 오병렬 (2005e) 유기인계 및 카바메이트계 농약의 토주용탈과 대류이동성 모형에 의한 이동성 예측, 한국환경농학회지 24(4):350-357   과학기술학회마을   DOI
18 Gaynor, J. D., D. C, MacTavish and W. I, Findlay. (1995) Atrazine and metolachlor loss in surface and subsurface runoff from three tillage treatments in com, J. Environ. Qual. 24:246-256   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Roberts, T. R. (1996) Assessing the environmental fate of agrochemicals, J. Environ. Sci. Health. B31:325-335
20 Boesten, J. J. T. I. and A. M. A, van der Linden. (1991) Modeling the influence of sorption and transformation on pesticide leaching and persistence, J. Environ. Qual. 20:425-435   DOI
21 European Commission (2004) Technical review report for S-metolachlor, SANCO/1426/2001 - rev.3
22 Tomlin, C. (ed.) (2003) The pesticide manual (13th ed.), British Crop Protection Council
23 Jury, W. A., D. D, Focht. and W. J, Farmer. (1987) Evaluation of pesticide groundwater pollution potential from standard indices of soil-chemical adsorption and biodegradation, J. Environ. Qual. 16:422-428   DOI   ScienceOn