Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2016.41.4.337

Atmospheric Stability Evaluation at Different Time Intervals for Determination of Aerial Spray Application Timing  

Huang, Yanbo (United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production Systems Research Unit)
Thomson, Steven J. (United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Division of Agricultural Systems)
Publication Information
Journal of Biosystems Engineering / v.41, no.4, 2016 , pp. 337-341 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluation of atmospheric conditions for proper timing of spray application is important to prevent off-target movement of crop protection materials. Susceptible crops can be damaged downwind if proper application procedure is not followed. In our previous study, hourly data indicated unfavorable conditions, primarily between evening 18:00 hrs in the evening and 6:00 hrs next morning, during clear conditions in the hot summer months in the Mississippi delta. With the requirement of timely farm operations, sub-hourly data are required to provide better guidelines for pilots, as conditions of atmospheric stability can change rapidly. Although hourly data can be interpolated to some degree, finer resolution for data acquisition of the order of 15 min would provide pilots with more accurate recommendations to match the data recording frequency of local weather stations. Methods: In the present study, temperature and wind speed data obtained at a meteorological tower were re-sampled to calculate the atmospheric stability ratio for sub-hour and hourly recommendations. High-precision evaluation of temperature inversion periods influencing atmospheric stability was made considering strength, time of occurrence, and duration of temperature inversion. Results and Discussion: The results indicated that atmospheric stability could be determined at different time intervals providing consistent recommendations to aerial applicators, thereby avoiding temperature inversion with minimal off-target drift of the sprayed liquid.
Keywords
Aerial application; Atmospheric stability; Temperature inversion;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bennett, D. 2006. 2,4-D herbicide drift damage stuns east Arkansas cotton. Delta Farm Press. Aug 11, 2006. Available at: http://deltafarmpress.com/24-d-herbicide-drift-damagestuns-east-arkansas-cotton Accessed 27 May 2016.
2 Beychok, M. R. 1994. Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion. 3rd ed. Newport Beach, CA: M.R. Beychock.
3 FAO. 2001. Guidelines on Good Practice for Aerial Application of Pesticides. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2001. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/y2766e/y2766e00.htm Accessed 27 May 2016.
4 Fritz, B. L., W. C. Hoffmann, Y. Lan, S. J. Thomson and Y. Huang. 2008. Low-level atmospheric temperature inversions: characteristics and impacts on aerial applications. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal. Manuscript PM 08 001. Vol. X.
5 Munn, R. E. 1966. Descriptive Meteorology-Advances in Geophysics Supplement 1. New York: Academic Press.
6 Ozkan, H. E. 1998. New nozzles for spray drift reduction. Ohio State University Extension Fact Sheet AEX-523-98. Available at http://ohioline.osu.edu/aex-fact/0523.html Accessed 27 May 2016.
7 Ramsey, G. 2002. Surface inversions, atmospheric stability, and spray drift. Pesticide Spray Drift Conference, Sacramento, California, Sept 5-6, 2002. Available at http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/enforce/drftinit/confs/2001/ramsey.ppt. Accessed 27 May 2016.
8 Yates, W. E., N. B. Akesson and R. E. Cowden. 1974. Criteria for minimizing drift residues on crops downwind from aerial applications. Transactions of the ASAE 17(4): 637-632.
9 Thomson, S. J., Y. Huang and B. K. Fritz. 2010. Temporal indications of atmospheric stability affecting off-target movement of spray in Midsouth U.S. ASABE Paper No. AA10-10. St. Joseph, MI: ASABE.