Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2016.41.1.060

A Dielectrophoresis Microfluidic Device for Trapping Bioparticles at Low Voltage and Frequency  

Jeong, Jin-Tae (Department of Rural and Biosystems Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Shin, Hyun-Min (Department of Rural and Biosystems Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Duwoon (Department of Food Science and Technology and BK21 Plus Program, Chonnam National University)
Lee, Kyeong-Hwan (Department of Rural and Biosystems Engineering, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Biosystems Engineering / v.41, no.1, 2016 , pp. 60-65 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The necessity for precise manipulation of bioparticles has greatly increased in the fields of bioscience, biomedical, and environmental monitoring. Dielectrophoresis (DEP) is considered to be an ideal technique to manipulate bioparticles. The objective of this study is to develop a DEP microfluidic device that can trap fluorescent beads, which mimic bioparticles, at the low voltage and frequency of the sinusoidal signal supplied to the microfluidic device. Methods: A DEP microfluidic device, which is composed of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) channels and interdigitated electrode networks, is fabricated to trap fluorescent beads. The geometry of the interdigitated electrodes is determined through computational simulation. To determine the optimum voltage and frequency of the sinusoidal signal supplied to the device, the experiments of trapping beads are conducted at various combinations of voltage and frequency. The performance of the DEP microfluidic device is evaluated by investigating the correlation between fluorescent intensities and bead concentrations. Results: The optimum ratio of the widths between the negative and positive electrodes was 1:4 ($20:80{\mu}m$) at a gap of $20{\mu}m$ between the two electrodes. The DEP electrode networks were fabricated based on this geometry and used for the bead trapping experiments. The optimum voltage and frequency of the supplied signal for trapping fluorescent beads were 15 V and 5 kHz, respectively. The fluorescent intensity of the trapped beads increased linearly as the bead concentration increased. The coefficient of determination ($R^2$) between the fluorescent intensity and the bead concentration was 0.989. Conclusions: It is concluded that the microfluidic device developed in this study is promising for trapping bioparticles, such as a cell or virus, if they are conjugated to beads, and their concentration is quantified.
Keywords
Bead manipulation; Bioparticle; Dielectrophoresis (DEP); Fluorescent intensity; Microfluidic device;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chen, A., T. Byvank, W. J. Chang, A. Bharde, G. Vieira, B. L. Miller, J. J. Chalmers, R. Bashir and R. Sooryakumar. 2013. On-chip magnetic separation and encapsulation of cells in droplets. Lab on a Chip 13(6):1172-1181.   DOI
2 Das, D., K. Biswas and S. Das. 2014. A microfluidic device for continuous manipulation of biological cells using dielectrophoresis. Medical Engineering & Physics 36(6):726-731.   DOI
3 Hunt, T. P., D. Issadore and R. M. Westervelt. 2008. Integrated circuit/microfluidic chip to programmably trap and move cells and droplets with dielectrophoresis. Lab on a Chip 8(1):81-87.   DOI
4 Khoshmanesh, K., S. Nahavandi, S. Baratchi, A. Mitchell and K. Kalantar-zadeh. 2011. Dielectrophoretic platforms for bio-microfluidic systems. Biosensors & Bioelectronics 26(5):1800-1814.   DOI
5 Qian, C., H. B. Huang, L. G. Chen, X. P. Li, Z. B. Ge, T. Chen, Z. Yang and L. N. Sun. 2014. Dielectrophoresis for Bioparticle Manipulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15(10):18281-18309.   DOI
6 Qiu, Y. Q., H. Wang, C. E. M. Demore, D. A. Hughes, P. Glynne-Jones, S. Gebhardt, A. Bolhovitins, R. Poltarjonoks, K. Weijer, A. Schonecker, M. Hill and S. Cochran. 2014. Acoustic Devices for Particle and Cell Manipulation and Sensing. Sensors 14(8):14806-14838.   DOI
7 Sajeesh, P. and A. K. Sen. 2014. Particle separation and sorting in microfluidic devices: a review. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 17(1):1-52.   DOI