Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2015.40.3.289

Comparison of Three Normalization Methods for 3D Joint Moment in the Asymmetric Rotational Human Movements in Golf Swing Analysis  

Lee, Dongjune (Department of Bio-Mechatronic Engineering, College of Biotechnology & Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Oh, Seung Eel (Department of Bio-Mechatronic Engineering, College of Biotechnology & Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Lee, In-Kwang (Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Chungbuk National University)
Sim, Taeyong (Department of Bio-Mechatronic Engineering, College of Biotechnology & Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Joo, Su-bin (Department of Bio-Mechatronic Engineering, College of Biotechnology & Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Park, Hyun-Joon (Department of Bio-Mechatronic Engineering, College of Biotechnology & Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Mun, Joung Hwan (Department of Bio-Mechatronic Engineering, College of Biotechnology & Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Biosystems Engineering / v.40, no.3, 2015 , pp. 289-295 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: From the perspective of biomechanics, joint moments quantitatively show a subject's ability to perform actions. In this study, the effect of normalization in the fast and asymmetric motions of a golf swing was investigated by applying three different normalization methods to the raw joint moment. Methods: The study included 13 subjects with no previous history of musculoskeletal diseases. Golf swing analyses were performed with six infrared cameras and two force plates. The majority of the raw peak joint moments showed a significant correlation at p < 0.05. Additionally, the resulting effects after applying body weight (BW), body weight multiplied by height (BWH), and body weight multiplied by leg length (BWL) normalization methods were analyzed through correlation and regression analysis. Results: The BW, BWH, and BWL normalization methods normalized 8, 10, and 11 peak joint moments out of 18, respectively. The best method for normalizing the golf swing was found to be the BWL method, which showed significant statistical differences. Several raw peak joint moments showed no significant correlation with measured anthropometrics, which was considered to be related to the muscle coordination that occurs in the swing of skilled professional golfers. Conclusions: The results of this study show that the BWL normalization method can effectively remove differences due to physical characteristics in the golf swing analysis.
Keywords
Asymmetrical motion; Correlation regression analysis; Joint moment; Normalization; Physical characteristic;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Buckley, J. M., D. C. Leang and T. M. Keaveny. 2006. Sensitivity of vertebral compressive strength to endplate loading distribution. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 128(5):641-646.   DOI
2 Choi, A., T. S. Yun, S. W. Suh, J. H. Yang, H. Park, S. Lee, M. S. Roh, T. G. Kang and J. H. Mun. 2013. Determination of input variables for the development of a gait asymmetry expert system in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 14:811-818.   DOI
3 Choi, A., S. B. Joo, E. Oh and J. H. Mun. 2014. Kinematic evaluation of movement smoothness in golf: relationship between the normalized jerk cost of body joints and the clubhead. Biomedical Engineering Online 13(20): doi:10.1186/1475-925X-13-20.   DOI
4 Choi A., T. Sim and J. H. Mun. 2015. Quasi-stiffness of the knee joint in flexion and extension during the golf swing. Journal of Sports Sciences 33(16):1682-1691.   DOI
5 Demircan, E., T. F. Besier and O. Khatib. 2012. Muscle force transmission to operational space accelerations during elite golf swings. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1464-1469, Saint Paul, MN.
6 Ferber, R., I. Davis, and D. S. Williams. 2003. Gender differences in lower extremity mechanics during running Clinical Biomechanics 18:350-357.   DOI
7 Fradkin, A. J., C. A. Sherman and C. F. Finch. 2004. Improving golf performance with a warm up conditioning programme. British Journal of Sports Medicine 38:762-765.   DOI
8 Gatt, C. J. Jr., M. J. Pavol, R. D. Parker and M. D. Grabiner. 1998. Three-dimensional knee joint kinetics during a golf swing. Influences of skill level and footwear. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 26(2):285-294.   DOI
9 Harding, G. T., C. L. H. Kozey, M. J. Dunbar, W. D. Stanish and J. L. A. Wilson. 2012. Body mass index affects knee joint mechanics during gait differently with and without moderate knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 20(11):1234-1242.   DOI
10 Hart, J. M., J. W. K. Ko, T. Konold and B. Pietrosimione. 2010. Sagittal plane knee joint moments following anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction: A systematic review. Clinical Biomechanics 25(4): 277-283.   DOI
11 Larsen, P. K., N. Lynnerup, M. Henriksen, T. Alkjaer and E. B. Simonsen. 2010. Gait Recognition Using Joint Moments, Joint Angles, and Segment Angles. Journal of Forensic Biomechanics 1:13-19.   DOI
12 Horan, S. A., K. Evans, N. R. Morris and J. J. Kvanagh. 2010. Thorax and pelvis kinematics during the downswing of male and female skilled golfers. Journal of Biomechanics 43(8):1456-1462.   DOI
13 Hsu, M. J., S. H. Wei, Y. H. Yu and Y. J. Chang. 2007. Leg stiffness and electromyography of knee extensors/flexors: Comparison between older and younger adults during stair descent. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 44(3):429-436.   DOI
14 Hunt, M. A., T. B. Birmingham, J. R. Giffin and T. Jenkyn. 2006. Associations among knee adduction moment, frontal plane ground reaction force, and lever arm during walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Biomechanics 39:2213-2220.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Lewek, M. D. 2011. The influence of body weight support on ankle mechanics during treadmill walking. Journal of Biomechanics 44(1):128-133.   DOI
16 Lynn, S. K. and G. J. Noffal. 2010. Frontal plane knee moments in golf: effect of target side foot at address. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 9:275-281.
17 Moisio, K. C., D. R. Sumner, S. Shott and D. E. Hurwitz. 2003. Normalization of joint moments during gait: a comparison of two techniques. Journal of Biomechanics 36:599-603.   DOI
18 Mullineaux, D. R., C. E. Milner, I. S. Davis and J. Hamill. 2006. Normalization of ground reaction forces. Journal of Applied Biomechanics 22(3):230-233.   DOI
19 Oh, S. E., A. R. Choi and J. H. Mun. 2013. Prediction of ground reaction forces during gait based on kinematics and a neural network model. Journal of Biomechanics 46:2372-2380.   DOI
20 Scott, S. H. and D. A. Winter. 1990. Internal forces of chronic running injury sites. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 22:357-369.
21 Silvernail, J. F., C. E. Milner, D. Thompson, S. Zhang and X. Zhao. 2013. The influence of body mass index and velocity on knee biomechanics during walking. Gait & Posture 37(4):575-579.   DOI
22 Somjarod, M., V. Tanawat and I. Weerawat. 2011. The Analysis of Knee Joint Movement During Golf Swing in Professional and Amateur Golfers. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technol. 53:525-528.
23 Wannop, J. W., J. T. Worobets and D. J. Stefanyshyn. 2012. Normalization of ground reaction forces, joint moments, and free moments in human locomotion. Journal of Applied Biomechanics 28:665-676.   DOI
24 Wheat, J. S., T. Vernon and C. E. Milner. 2007. The measurement of upper body alignment in the golf drive. Journal of Sports Sciences 25:749-755.   DOI
25 Winter, D. A. 1990. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. New York: John Wiley & Sons.