Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2015.40.1.019

Visibility Evaluation for Agricultural Tractor Operators According to ISO 5006 and 5721-1 Standards  

Kabir, Md. Shaha Nur (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University)
Song, Mingzhang (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University)
Chung, Sun-Ok (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University)
Kim, Yong-Joo (Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University)
Kim, Su-Chul (LS Mtron R&D Center)
Ha, Jong-Kyou (Research Institute, Kukje Machinery Co., Ltd.)
Publication Information
Journal of Biosystems Engineering / v.40, no.1, 2015 , pp. 19-27 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: A system to measure the visibility of agricultural tractor operators was designed and evaluated according to ISO standards, and a blind area diagram around the tested tractor was created based on the manual method recommended by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Methods: A visibility measurement system was designed and evaluated based on the ISO 5006 and ISO 5721-1 standards. Two bulbs used to simulate the operator's eyes were mounted on a bar with a supporting frame. A wooden frame was used to determine the seat index point position. The 12-m visibility test circle was divided into six sectors of vision, and the test tractor was placed at the center of the circle. Artificial light was supplied in the darkened environment, and shadow or masking effects were measured manually around the 12-m circle. Results: When the bulbs were placed at the operator's eye level, front visibility was good; no masking was found in the "A" vision sector, but larger masking widths were found in the "B" and "C" vision sectors. Since the masking width exceeded 700 mm, additional tests, such as movement of the light sources to both sides of the operator's eye level, were performed. Less than six masking effects were found in the semi-circle of vision to the front, and more than one masking was found in the "B" and "C" visual fields. The minimum distance between the centers of two masking effects exceeded 2500 mm when measured as a chord on the semi-circle of vision. A blind area diagram was created to define the exact nature of the blind spots and mirror visibility. Conclusions: Visibility evaluation is an effective way to enable proper and safe operation for agricultural tractor operators. Inclusion of this visibility evaluation test in the general testing process might aid tractor manufacturers.
Keywords
Agricultural tractor; Field of view; Operator visibility; Safety; Test standard;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Barron, P. J., K. P. McDonnell, S. M. Ward and P. M. O. Owende. 2005b. A light-meter method for assessment of blind areas in operator field of view. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 11(3):373-377.   DOI
2 Barron, P. J., P. M. O. Owende, K. P. McDonnell and S. M. Ward. 2005a. A method for assessment of degradation of task visibility from operator cabins of field machines. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35(7): 665-673.   DOI
3 Choi, C. B., P. Park, Y. H. Kim, M. S. Hallbeck and M. C. Jung. 2009. Comparison of visibility measurement techniques for forklift truck design factors. Applied Ergonomics 40:280-285.   DOI
4 Gellerstedt, S., R. Almqvist, D. Myhrman, B. O. Wikstrom, M. Attebrandt and J. Winkel. 1999. Ergonomic Guideline for Forest Machines. Handbook. Skogforsk, Uppsala, Sweden.
5 Hinze, J. W and J. Teizer. 2011. Visibility-related fatalities related to construction equipment. Journal of Safety Science 49(5):709-718.   DOI
6 Hutter, G. M. 2000. Earthmoving equipment - An operator's field of view (SAE Standard J1091). Safety and Forensic Engineering Journal. Available at: www.meridianeng.com/EarthMovers.html.
7 ISO. 1989. ISO 5721: Tractors for agriculture - Operator's field of vision. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
8 ISO. 1995. ISO 5353: Earth-moving machinery, and tractors and machinery for agriculture and forestry - Seat index point. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
9 ISO. 2006. ISO 5006: Earth-moving machinery - Operator's field of view - Test method and performance criteria. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
10 ISO. 2007. ISO 3411: Earth-moving machinery - Physical dimensions of operators and minimum operator space envelope. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
11 ISO. 2013. ISO 5721-1: Agricultural tractors - Requirements, test procedures and acceptance criteria for the operator's field of vision - Part 1: Field of vision to the front. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
12 Jung, D. Y., H. C. Kim, J. H. Leem, S. G. Park, D. H. Lee, S. J. Lee and G. W. Kim. 2011. Estimated occupational injury rate and work related factors based on data from the fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 23(2):149-163.
13 Lee, K and H. S. Lim. 2008. Work-related injuries and diseases of farmers in Korea. Industrial Health 46:424-434.   DOI
14 OHS. 2013. Agricultural tractor safety - Fact sheet. University of Minnesota, S.E., Minneapolis, MN: Occupational Health and Safety (OHS).
15 Lund, M and L. Butters. 2011. An investigation and comparison into operator field of vision for modern tractor cabs. Scientific Papers, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest, Series A, Agronomy, LIV (1):414-419.
16 MOEL. 2008. Statistics on occupational injuries and illnesses, Ministry of Employment and Labor (MOEL). Retrieved from http://www.kosha.or.kr/www/boardView.do?contentId=204893&menuId=554&boardType=A2.
17 NIOSH. 2012. Highway Work Zone Safety, Construction equipment visibility - Manual method: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov//niosh.
18 Ray, S. J and J. Teizer. 2011. Coarse head pose estimation of construction equipment operators to formulate dynamic blind spots. Advanced Engineering Informatics 26:117-130.
19 RDA. 2007a. A study on agriculture machinery accidents. 2006 annual report of NIAE, 36. National Institute of Agriculture Engineering (NIAE), Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea.
20 Teizer, J., B. S. Allread and U. Mantripragada. 2010. Automating the blind spot measurement of construction equipment. Automation in Construction 19(4):491-501.   DOI
21 Whitelaw, T. 2012. Safer motoring: Learning about the blind spot when driving, UK. Retrieved from http://www.safermotoring.co.uk/learning-about-blind-spot-when-driving.html.
22 RDA. 2007b. A study on patterns and characteristics of agriculture-related injury by analysis of safety aid system of farm workers. Final research report. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Korea.