Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2014.39.3.205

Monte Carlo Simulation of Phytosanitary Irradiation Treatment for Mangosteen Using MRI-based Geometry  

Oh, Se-Yeol (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Pusan National University)
Kim, Jongsoon (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Pusan National University)
Kwon, Soon-Hong (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Pusan National University)
Chung, Sung-Won (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Pusan National University)
Kwon, Soon-Goo (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Pusan National University)
Park, Jong-Min (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Pusan National University)
Choi, Won-Sik (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Biosystems Engineering / v.39, no.3, 2014 , pp. 205-214 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Phytosanitary irradiation treatment can effectively control regulated pests while maintaining produce quality. The objective of this study was to establish the best irradiation treatment for mangosteen, a popular tropical fruit, using a Monte Carlo simulation. Methods: Magnetic resonance image (MRI) data were used to generate a 3-D geometry to simulate dose distributions in a mangosteen using a radiation transport code (MCNP5). Microsoft Excel with visual basic application (VBA) was used to divide the image data into seed, flesh, and rind. Radiation energies used for the simulation were 10 MeV (high-energy) and 1.35 MeV (low-energy) for the electron beam, 5 MeV for X-rays, and 1.25 MeV for gamma rays from Co-60. Results: At 5 MeV X-rays and 1.25 MeV gamma rays, all areas (seeds, flesh, and rind) were irradiated ranging from 0.3 ~ 0.7 kGy. The average doses decreased as the number of fruit increased. For a 10 MeV electron beam, the dose distribution was biased: the dose for the rind where the electrons entered was $0.45{\pm}0.03$ kGy and the other side was $0.24 {\pm}0.10$ kGy. Use of an electron kinetic energy absorber improved the dose distribution in mangosteens. For the 1.35 MeV electron beam, the dose was shown only in the rind on the irradiated side; no significant dose was found in the flesh or seeds. One rotation of the fruit while in front of the beam improved the dose distribution around the entire rind. Conclusion: These results are invaluable for determining the ideal irradiation conditions for phytosanitary irradiation treatment of tropical fruit.
Keywords
Mangosteen; Monte Carlo; MRI; Phytosanitary irradiation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Anon. 1994. Methyl bromide under fire. Environmental Health Perspectives 102, 732.   DOI
2 Anderson, H.L. 1986. Metropolis, Monte Carlo and the MANIAC. Los Alamos Science 14:96-108.
3 Agostinelli, S., J. Allision, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, H. Araujo et al.,2003.GEANT4 - a simulation toolkit. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 506: 250-303.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Ajayi, I.A., R.A. Oderinde, B.O. Ogunkoya, A. Egunyomi, and V.O. Taiwo. 2007. Chemical analysis and preliminary toxicological evaluation of Garciniamangostana seeds and seed oil, Food Chemistry 101:999-1004.   DOI
5 Borsa, J., R. Chu, J. Sun, N. Linton and C. Hunter. 2002. Use of CT scans and treatment planning software for validation of the dose component of food irradiation protocols. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 63:271-275.   DOI
6 Chen, F.L., Y.M. Wei and B. Zhang. 2010. Characterization of water state and distribution in textured soybean protein using DSC and NMR. Journal of Food Engineering 100:522-526.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Choi, Y. and M.R. Okos. 1986. Thermal properties of liquid foods: Review. In Physical and Chemical Properties of Food, M.R. Okos (ed.) American society of Agricultural Engineers. St. Joseph, Mich., pp.35-77.
8 Diczbalis, Y. 2011 (revised). Farm and Forestry Production and Marketing Profile for Mangosteen (Garciniamangostana). In: Elevitch, C.R. (ed.). Specialty Crops for Pacific Island Agroforestry. Permanent Agriculture Resources (PAR), Holualoa, Hawai'i. http://agroforestry.net/scps
9 Fisher, P.F. 1991. Modeling soil map-unit inclusion by Monte Carlo simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5(2):193-208.   DOI
10 Elishakoff, I. 2001. Essay on the role of the Monte Carlo method in stochastic mechanics. In: Monte Carlo Simulation, eds. G.I. Schueller and P.D. Spanos, Abingdon: Balkema.
11 Hallman, G.J. 2011. Phytosanitary applications of irradiation. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 10:143-151.   DOI
12 FAO. 2012. Available at: www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/131114/icode/
13 FAO/WHO. 1984. Codex General Standard for Irradiated Foods and Recommended International Code of Practice for the Operation of Radiation Facilities used for the Treatment of Food, Codex Alimentarius. Rome, Italy.
14 Gould. 1994. Cold storage. In: Quarantine Treatment for Pests of Food Plants, eds. J.L. Sharp and G.J. Hallman, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
15 Hallman, G.J. and J.W. Armstrong. 1994. Heated air treatments. In: Quarantine Treatment for Pests of Food Plants, eds. J.L. Sharp and G.J. Hallman, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
16 Kim, J., R.G. Moreira, R. Rivadeneira, and M. E. Castell-Perez. 2006a. Monte Carlo-based food irradiation simulator. Journal of Food Process Engineering 29:72-88.   DOI
17 Kim, J., R.G. Rivadeneira, M.E. Castell-Perez and R.G. Moreira. 2006b. Development and validation of a methodology for dose calculation in electron beam irradiation of complex-shaped foods. Journal of Food Engineering 74:359-369.   DOI
18 Lucas, T., A. Grenier, S. Quellec, A.L. Bail and A. Davenel. 2005. MRI quantification of ice gradients in dough during freezing or thawing processes. Journal of Food Engineering 71:98-108.   DOI
19 Matsui, Y., T. Inoue, T. Matsushita, T. Yamada, M. Yamamoto, and Y. Sumigama. 2005. Effect of uncertainties in agricultural working schedules and Monte-Carlo evaluation of the model input in basin scale runoff model analysis of herbicide. Water Science Technology 51:329-337.
20 Mitcham, E., and E. Yahia. 2008. Alternative Treatments to Hot Water Immersion for Mango Fruit, Report to the National Mango Board.
21 Puerta-Gomez, A.F., J. Kim, R.G. Moreira, G.A. Klutke, and M.E. Castell-Perez. 2013. Quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of intervention steps to reduce the risk of contamination of ready-to-eat baby spinach with Salmonella. Food Control 31:410-418.   DOI
22 Musse, M., S. Challois, D. Huc, S. Quellec and F. Mariette. 2014. MRI method for investigation of eye growth in semi-hard cheese. Journal of Food Engineering 121: 152-158.   DOI
23 Osman, M. and M.A. Rahman. 2006. Mangosteen-Garciniamangostana. Southampton Centre for Underutilised Crops, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
24 Rumsey, T.R and K.L. McCarthy. 2012. Modeling oil migration in two-layer chocolate-almond confectionery products. Journal of Food Engineering 111:149-155.   DOI
25 Tunlayadechanont, S. 2013. Fresh fruits irradiation for phytosanitary purposes in Thailand using a multipurpose irradiation facility. ISHS Acta Horticulture 973:35-44.
26 USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 26 (2014).
27 Weiss, J. and F.X. Rizzo. 1970. Cobalt-60 dosimetry in radiation research and processing. In: Manual on Radiation Dosimetry, eds. N.W. Holm and R.J. Berry, New York: Marcel Dekker.
28 Zadernowski, R., S. Czaplicki, and M. Naczk. 2009. Phenolic acid profiles of mangosteen fruits, Food Chemistry 112:685-689.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 ICRP. 1975. Report on the Task Group on Reference Man. ICRP Publication 23. Pergamon Press: International Commission on Radiological Protection.
30 Bond, E.J. 1984. Manual of Fumigation for Insect Control. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
31 Nelson, W.R., H. Hirayama and D.W.O. Rogers. 1985. The EGS4 code system. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA.