Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2009.34.2.120

A Study on Visibility Evaluation for Cabin Type Combine  

Choi, C.H. (KSAM)
Kim, J.D. (Faculty of Life Science and Technology, SungKyunKwan University)
Kim, T.H. (Faculty of Life Science and Technology, SungKyunKwan University)
Mun, J.H. (Faculty of Life Science and Technology, SungKyunKwan University)
Kim, Y.J. (KSAM, LS Mtron LTD.)
Publication Information
Journal of Biosystems Engineering / v.34, no.2, 2009 , pp. 120-126 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a visibility evaluation system for cabin type combine. Human's field of view was classified into five levels (perceptive, effective, stable gaze, induced, and auxiliary) depending on rotation of human's head and eye. Divider, reaper lever, gearshift, dashboard, and conveying part were considered as major viewpoints of combine. Visibilities of combine was evaluated quantitatively using the viewpoints and the human's field of view levels. The visibility evaluation system for cabin type combine was consisted of a laser pointer, stepping motors to control the direction of view, gyro sensors to measure horizontal and vertical angle, and I/O interface to acquire the signals. Tests were conducted with different postures ('sitting straight', 'sitting with $15^{\circ}$ tilt', 'standing straight', and 'standing with $15^{\circ}$ tilt'). The LSD (least significant difference) multiple comparison tests showed that the visibilities of viewpoints were different significantly as the operator's postures were changed. The results showed that the posture at standing with $15^{\circ}$ tilt provided the best visibility for operators. The divider of the combine was invisible due to blocking with the cabin frame at many postures. The reaper lever showed good visibilities at the postures of sitting or standing with $15^{\circ}$ tilt. The gearshift, the dashboard, and the conveying part had reasonable visibilities at the posture of sitting with $15^{\circ}$ tilt. However, most viewpoints of the combine were out of the stable gaze field of view level. Modifications of the combine design will be required to enhance the visibility during harvesting operation for farmers' safety and convenience.
Keywords
Visibility evaluation; Cabin type combine; Quantitative evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kim, Y. J., D. S Lim, S. S. Lee and J. H. Mun. 2008. Ergonomic analysis of combine task. Proceedings of the KSAM 2008 Winter Conference 13(1):60-64. Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery, Suwon, Republic of Korea. (In Korean)
2 Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. 2002. KS R ISO 7397:Passenger Cars-Verification of Driver's Direct Field of View. Korean Industrial Standards, Gwacheon, Republic of Korea. (In Korean)
3 Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. 2005. The 5th Korean Critical Anthropometric Measurement Report. Size Korea, Gwacheon, Republic of Korea. (In Korean)
4 Nakaji, Y., S. Kitazaki, K. Kato, S. Hijikata and A. Hirao. 2003. Display Apparatus and Method for Automotive Vehicle. US patent No:6,556,134
5 Ryu, T. B., S. W. Shin and H. C. Yoo. 2004. Development of a quantitative visibility evaluation system for the design of an occupant packaging layout. Proceedings of the KIIE/KORMS 2004 Spring Conference, pp. 659-662. Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (In Korean)   과학기술학회마을
6 Choi, J. H. 1999. A study on the visibility factors for seating packaging. Journal of the Research Institute of Production Technology 2:19-29. (In Korean)
7 Jang, S. R. 2001. Human Engineering. Dasom, Seoul, Republic of Korea