Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2019.61.4.043

The Monitoring and Evaluation of the Community Central Revitalization Project in Yeongwol - Focusing on the Community Empowerment Project in 2018 -  

Jeong, Meekyung (Department of Social Welfare, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Kisung (Department of Regional Infrastructure Engineering, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers / v.61, no.4, 2019 , pp. 43-54 More about this Journal
Abstract
The present study aims to monitor three of the community empowerment projects implemented as part of the community central revitalization projects in Yeongwol. We used an established indicator (i.e., quantitative evaluation) as well as an interview (i.e., qualitative evaluation) throughout the monitoring process. The PM (project manager) committee members, consisting of six interdisciplinary experts, carried out the monitoring from $24^{th}$ of October until the $26^{th}$ of November 2018. We categorized the results of the monitoring into the aspects of needs, software, and hardware, and analyzed them as follows: First, although the locals were willing to take part in programs, they were in overall not well informed about the ongoing programs and the program that suits their needs the most. The service organization should therefore actively publicize the program and provide sufficient information about it .Second, instead of a one-off program, the locals should be empowered to take over the program eventually and develop it as a local business model. Last, the locals from the center as well as the outskirts of Yeongwol should organize a learning net, collaboratively develop a further program, and assess its effectiveness by employing a thorough monitoring system.
Keywords
Yeongwol; community center revitalization projects; community empowerment projects; monitoring; PM;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan), 2011. Annual report Japan's ODA evaluation 2011. Tokyo: MOFA.
2 Mohr, L. B., 1995. Impact Analysis for Program Evaluation (2nd Eds.). CA: Sage Publication, Inc.
3 Oh, H. J., 2000. A study on the learner's evaluative criteria of adult education program. A Thesis for Degree of Doctor of Education in SNU.
4 Poster. J. J., 2004. Performance Monitoring, In Wholey, I. S., H. P. Hatry., and K. E. Newcomer, (eds). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
5 Rossi, P. H., M. W. Lipsey, and H. E. Freeman, 2004. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.), 171-172. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, Inc.
6 MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and community Affairs), 2018. Revitalization of community development project (in Korean).
7 MOE.KEDI, 2004. White paper on lifelong education. Seoul: MOE.KEDI.
8 AusAID (The Australian Agency for International Development, AUS), 2011. Guideline: Completing a quality at implementation report. Canberra: AusAID.
9 Chen, H. T., 2005. Practical Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication, Inc.
10 CIDA (Canadian International Development Agency, CAN), 2004. CIDA evaluation guide. Ottawa: Canada Evaluation Division Performance & Knowledge Management Branch.
11 DFID (Department for International Development, UK), 2011. Monitoring and evaluation framework: Breaking the cycle: Saving lives and protecting the future. London.
12 Joo, K. P., and D. B. Kwon, 2008. The development of evaluation criteria system to monitor programs at university lifelong education centers. Andragogy Today: International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education 11(1): 27-55.
13 Walter, J. D., 1976. Monitoring for government agencies. Washington, D. C.: The Urban Institute.