Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2012.54.5.091

Utility of Gridded Observations for Statistical Bias-Correction of Climate Model Outputs and its Hydrologic Implication over West Central Florida  

Hwang, Sye-Woon (Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers / v.54, no.5, 2012 , pp. 91-102 More about this Journal
Keywords
Regional climate model (RCM); bias-correction; gridded observation; hydrologic simulation; integrated hydrologic model (IHM);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hwang S., W. Graham, J. L. Hernández, C. Martinez, J. W. Jones, A. Adams, 2011. Quantitative spatiotemporal evaluation of dynamically downscaled MM5 precipitation predictions over the Tampa Bay region, Florida. Journal of Hydrometeorology 12(6): 1447-1464.   DOI
2 Hwang, S., W. Graham, J. S. Geurink, and A. Adams, 2012. Hydrologic implications of errors in dynamically downscaled and bias-corrected climate model predictions. Journal of Hydrology, under review.
3 Karl, T. and K. Trenberth, 2003. Modern global change. Science 302: 1719-1722.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Maurer, E. P., A. W. Wood, J. C. Adam, D. P. Lettenmaier, and B. Nijssen, 2002. A Long-Term Hydrologically-Based Data Set of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States. Journal of Climate 15: 3237-3251.   DOI
5 McGregor, J. L., 1997. Regional climate modeling. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics 63: 105-117, DOI:10.1007/BF01025367.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Murphy, A. J., 1999. An evaluation of statistical and dynamical techniques for downscaling local climate. Journal of Climate 12: 2256-2284.   DOI
7 Nash, J. E. and J. V. Sutcliffe, 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I: A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282-290. Doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Wood, A. W., L. R. Leung, V. Sridhar, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2004. Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Climatic Change 62: 189-216.   DOI
9 Zhong, S., H. J. In, X. Bian, J. Charney, W. Heilman, and B. Potter, 2005. Evaluation of real-time high-resolution MM5 predictions over the Great Lakes region. Weather Forecasting 20: 63-81.   DOI
10 Elder, K., D. Cline, A. Goodbody, P. Houser, G. E. Liston, L. Mahrt, and N. Rutter, 2010. NASA Cold Land Processes Experiment (CLPX 2002/03): Ground-Based and Near-Surface Meteorological Observations. Journal of Hydrometeorology 10: 330-337.
11 Florea, L. J., 2008. Geology and Hydrology of Karst in West-Central and North-Central Florida. Caves and Karst of Florida, 225-239.
12 Fowler, H. J., S. Blenkinsop, and C. Tebaldi, 2007. Linking climate change modeling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modeling. International Journal of Climatology 27: 1547-1578.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Geurink, J. and R. Basso, 2011. Development, calibration, and evaluation of the Integrated Northern Tampa Bay Hydrologic Model. Tampa Bay Water and the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Clearwater, FL.
14 Geurink, J., R. Basso, P. Tara, K. Trout, and M. Ross, 2006. Improvements to integrated hydrologic modeling in the Tampa Bay, Florida region: Hydrologic similarity and calibration metrics. Proceedings of the Joint Federal Interagency Conference, Reno, NV.
15 Harbaugh, A. W. and M. G. McDonald, 1996. Programmer's documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U.S. Geological Surbay modular finitedifference ground-water flow model, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-486, Reston, VA.
16 Giorgi F., B. Hewitson, J. Christensen, M. Hulme, H. Von Storch, P. Whetton, R. Jones, L. Mearns, and C. Fu, 2001. Regional climate information-evaluation and projections. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 583-638, 739-768.
17 Graham L. P., S. Hagemann, S. Jaun, and M. Beniston, 2007. On interpreting hydrological change from regional climate models. Climatic Change 81: 97-122. DOI:10.1007/s10584-006-9217-0.   DOI
18 Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1994. A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR, 117 and 122.
19 Colle, B. A., K. Westrick, and C. F. Mass, 1999. Evaluation of MM5 and Eta-10 precipitation forecasts over the Pacific Northwest during the cool season. Weather Forecasting 14: 137-154.   DOI
20 Bicknell, B., J. C. Imhoff, J. L. Kittle, T. H. Jr., Jobes, and A. D. Donigian, 2001. Hydrologic simulation program-FORTRAN (HSPF): User's manual for Version 12, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
21 Dibike Y. B. and P. Coulibaly, 2005. Hydrologic impact of climate change in the Saguenay watershed: comparison of downscaling methods and hydrologic models. Journal of Hydrology 307: 145-163.   DOI