Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2009.51.6.017

Assessment of the Impacts of the Impervious Surface Change in the Farm Region on Watershed Hydrology  

Kim, Hak-Kwan (서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원)
Lee, Eun-Jeong (서울대학교 대학원)
Park, Seung-Woo (서울대학교 조경.지역시스템공학부.농업생명과학연구원)
Kang, Moon-Seong (서울대학교 조경.지역시스템공학부.농업생명과학연구원)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers / v.51, no.6, 2009 , pp. 17-23 More about this Journal
Abstract
The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was used in this study to evaluate the hydrologic impacts by the impervious surface change in the farm region. The model was calibrated and validated by using four years (1999-2002) of measured data for the Gyeongancheon watershed in Korea. The simulation results agreed well with observed values during the calibration and validation periods. Land use scenarios including various changes of the plastic film house area in the farm region were applied to assess their effects on watershed hydrology. The results indicated that the surface direct (5.6%~14.0%) and total runoff (0.8%~1.5%) increased, but the groundwater discharge (10.7%~27.7%) and evapotranspiration (1.5%~3.3%) decreased as the plastic film house area (5.7%~12.4%) increased.
Keywords
Impervious surface; plastic film house; hydrologic impact; SWAT model; remote sensing technique;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Choi, S. M., and H. W. Lee, 2003. Analysis on the improvement level of minor rural roads - A cast study on the country areas of Chonnam province -. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 9(3): 25-34 (in Korean)   ScienceOn
2 Heo, C. H., 2003. Characteristics of runoff variation due to watershed urbanization. Korea Water Resources Association 36(5): 725-740 (in Korean)   DOI   ScienceOn
3 National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2004. National engineering handbook, Part 630-Hydrology. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., USA
4 Neitsch, S. G., J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, and J. R. Williams, 2005. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation. Version 2005, United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas, USA
5 Arnold, C. L., Jr., and C. J. Gibbons, 1996. Impervious surface coverage: Emergence of a key environmental factor. Journal of the American Planning Association 62(2): 243-258   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Park, M. J., H. J. Kwon, and S. J. Kim, 2005. Analysis of impacts of land cover change on runoff using HSPF model. Korea Water Resources Association 38(6): 495-504 (in Korean)   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Saxton, K. E., W. J. Rawls, J. S. Romberger, and R. I. Papendick, 1986. Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50(4): 1031-1036   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Schueler, R. R., 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques 1(3): 100-111
9 Dow, C. L. and D. R. DeWalle, 2000. Trends in evaporation and Bowen ration on urbanizing watersheds in Eastern United States. Water Resources Research 36(7): 1835-1843   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MIFAFF), 2008. Food, agricultural, forestry and fisheries statistical yearbook. Gwacheon, Korea (in Korean)
11 Winchell B., R. Srinivasan, M. Di Luzio, and J. Arnold, 2008. ArcSWAT 2.0 interface for SWAT2005 user's guide, United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Temple, Texas, USA
12 Brabec, E., S. Schulte, and P. L. Richards, 2002. Impervious surface and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. Journal of Planning Literature 16(4): 499-514   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Chester, L., Jr. Arnold, and C. J. Gibbons, 1996. Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association 62(2): 243-258   DOI   ScienceOn
14 David, R. L., and M. J. Gregory, 1999. Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research 35(1): 233-241   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF), 1996. Statistical yearbook of agriculture forestry and fisheries, Gwacheon, Korea (in Korean)
16 Arnold, J. G., R. Srinivasan, R. S. Muttiah, and J. R. Williams, 1998. Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment Part Ⅰ: Model development. Journal of American Water Resources Association 34(1): 73-89   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Lee, S. J., Y. Kim, S. H. Lee, and K. S. Lee, 2005. Water cycle simulation for the Dorimcheon catchment using WEP model. Korea Water Resources Association 38(6): 449-460 (in Korean)   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Nash J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe, 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models par Ⅰ-A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282-290   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Jung, S. O., 2004. Groundwater management in the Kumamoto region, Jyushu, Japan. Magazine of Korea Water Resources Association 37(2): 74-81 (in Korean)
20 Lazaro, T. R., 1979. Urban hydrology: A multidisciplinary perspective, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
21 Green, W. H., and G. A. Ampt, 1911. Studies on soil physics, 1. The flow of air and water through soils. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4: 11-24
22 Kim, J. K., K. H. Son, J. W. Noh, C. L. Jang, and I. H. Ko, 2006. Evaluation of urbanization effect and analysis of hydrological characteristics in the Gap River catchment using SWAT. Korea Water Resources Association 39(10): 881-890 (in Korean)   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn