Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2006.48.1.041

A Cultural Property Priority Assessment Using Information Measure Technique  

Jung, Nam-Su (서울대학교)
Lee, Jeong-Jae (서울대학교)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers / v.48, no.1, 2006 , pp. 41-48 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the evaluation of rural amenities, its properties are related with social, cultural, and environmental elements. In this study, Information Measure Model (IMM) and Cultural Property Priority Assessment Model (CPPAM) were developed adapting information measure model with text based surveying data. To apply developed model not only general properties but also specific surveyed data, Specific Information Gathering and Utilizing System (SIGUS) was constructed using the data in Dusan World encyclopedia. IMM shows priorities of cultural property by information in national-designated cultural properties. And CPPAM applied in surveying data in 2004 by Rural Resources Development Institute.
Keywords
Cultural Property; Priority assessment; Information measure;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Oh, H. S., Kim, J. S., Amenity and regional development, New Wave Publishing. (in Korean)
2 Li, M. and Vitanyi, P. M. B., 1993, "An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications", Springer-Verlag, New York, USA
3 Douglas, R. H., 1999. An ethernal golden braid. Kachi Publishing Co., Ltd.
4 Gell-Mann, M.. Lloyd, S., 1996. Information measures. effective complexity. and total Information. Complexity, 2(1) 44-52   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Jung, N. S., 2003, Development of an information measure technique for rural facilities location and amenities assess-ment, Seoul Nationa University. (in Korean)
6 Kim. S. G., Sim, S. H., 1988. A study on the value of tourism resources of cultural assets, The Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 28. Kangweon National University. (in Korean)
7 Kim, S. B. et. al., 2004. Standadized surveying method of rural amenity resources with database normalization Technique, Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning in Press. (in Korean)
8 Kim, S. G., Sim, S. H, "A study on the value of tourism resources of cultural assets", Journal of Social Sciences 29 pp. 128-145
9 Kwon, O. S., "Environmental economics", Parkyoungsa
10 Ministry of Government Registration, 2002, National-designated cultural property, Cultural Property Protective Registration 2(1). (in Korean)
11 Na, J. Y. et. aI., 2004, Application of information measure technique for ranking of evaluation criteria of public works, Journal of Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers in Press. (in Korean)
12 Shannon, C. E., 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423   DOI
13 Siegfried, T., 2002. The bit and the pendulum. John Wiley & Sons
14 Sung, H. C, Ahn, T. M., "A Study on the improvement and problems of environmental impact assessment", Journal of Korea Landscape, 21(2) pp. 91-106   과학기술학회마을
15 Crutchfield, J. P., 1994. The calculi of emergence: Computation, dynamics, and induction. Physica D
16 Choi, K. B., 2001. A Classification of word meaning for construction of knowledge base. The Discourse and Cognitive Society of Korea 8(2) 275-303. (in Korean)
17 Choi, S. M., 1998. Development of regional resources evaluation system for rural planning. Korean Society of Rural Planning 4(1) 75-85. (in Korean)
18 Copeland, B. J., 1998. Super turing-machines. Complexity. 4(1), 30-32   DOI   ScienceOn