Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2019.26.3.0165

The Difference in the Rurality of Rural Villages near a Metropolitan City - The Case of Two Villages near by Ulsan -  

Ko, Kyung-Ho (Department of Environmental & Resource Economics, Dankook University)
Kim, Tae-Yeon (Department of Environmental & Resource Economics, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development / v.26, no.3, 2019 , pp. 165-179 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to examine the difference in the rurality of rural villages near a metropolitan city. It investigated the general status and economic activities of the two villages near Ulsan Metropolitan City to find out what the differences are and to diagnose the reasons for such differences and their impact on future changes in the villages. Through this survey analysis, it found that the two villages have been continuously experiencing a decrease in population over the last 10 years, despite being near large cities. In addition, it also identified the characteristics of the agricultural and livestock industries taking center stage in economic activities. In other words, although the cases are rural villages near a big city, it was shown that the village near a provincial city is basically based on agricultural characteristics. Regarding future prospects, on the one hand, in the case of Dagae-ri, the villagers expect that the current livestock industry-oriented activities may continue to develop. On the other hand, in the case of Shinhwa-ri, the residents think that the rural characteristics may be rapidly lost and urbanized. Based on these findings, this study suggests that rural policies for villages near large cities also need to be applied in a discriminatory manner, taking into account the basis on which economic activities in the villages are developed.
Keywords
rural-urban fringe; rurality; urbanity; community development; economic activities; capacity building;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김봉원, & 김유일. (1997). 수도권 근교농촌의 삶의 질 평가. 농촌계획, 3(1), 77-85.
2 김유일, & 이애란. (1997). 도시근교 농촌의 토지이용 및 경관의 변화. 농촌계획, 3(2), 71-80.
3 김일철. (1989). 농촌인구 감소에 따른 농촌사회조직의 변화. 21세기 농정발전방향 구상을 위한 기초연구. 서울: 한국농촌경제연구원.
4 김정태, 강동우, & 이성우. (2009). 농촌성과 도시성의 인식론적 이해. 농촌계획, 15(3), 47-60.
5 김형국. (1974). 도시의 근교농촌: 도시와 근교 농촌의 통합적인 지역발전. 도시문제, 9(9), 47-54.
6 박덕병, 이민수, & 윤유식. (2006). 농촌관광 방문객의 농촌성(Rurality) 인지 영향 요인. 호텔관광연구, 9(3), 199-212.
7 박석희, 이동기, & 윤상헌. (2002). 농촌다움의 의미와 측정 척도개발에 관한 연구. 농어촌관광연구, 9(1), 22-37.
8 박시현, 정문수, & 민경찬. (2017). 한국 농어촌 마을의 변화 실태와 중장기 발전 방향(3/5차년도). 나주: 한국농촌경제연구원.
9 박윤호, 전영미, 임상봉, 이석주, 엄대호, 장은숙, et al. (2001). 농촌마을 특성화에 대한 정책방안 연구. 안산: 농업기반공사 농어촌연구원.
10 박진환. (1967). 근교농촌의 개발: 도시성장과 근교농업의 영농합리화. 도시문제, 2(9), 2-9.
11 성주인, 박대식, 정은미, & 민경찬. (2015). 한국 농어촌 마을의 변화 실태와 중장기 발전 방향(1/5차년도). 한국농촌경제연구원.
12 성주인, 송미령, 정문수, & 민경찬. (2016). 한국 농어촌 마을의 변화 실태와 중장기 발전 방향(2/5차년도). 한국농촌경제연구원.
13 성주인, 송미령, 정문수, 민경찬, & 이희연. (2016). 대도시 근교 농촌마을의 변화실태 조사. 서울: 한국농촌경제연구원.
14 손용훈, 이차희, & 사이토유키히코. (2014). 공장입지에 따른 대도시 근교지역 농촌마을의 경관변화 특징. 농촌계획, 20(1), 13-26.   DOI
15 왕인근. (1967). 근교농촌의 개발: 도시화에 따른 근교농촌의 변동과 개발. 도시문제, 2(9), 10-19.
16 엄은희. (2012). 변화하는 농촌성과 지역귀농운동조직의 대응: 부산귀농학교를 사례로. 농촌사회, 22(1), 133-172.
17 윤원근. (1999). 한국농촌계획론. 서울: 대학출판사.
18 이상문. (2001). 한국 농촌마을의 공동정주기능 변화에 관한 연구. 국토계획, 36(1), 7-23.
19 이종성. (1989). 근교농업개발을 위한 농촌지도방향. 지방행정, 38, 80-85.
20 주봉규. (1974). 근교농촌과 토지이용. 도시문제, 9(9), 7.
21 진양명숙. (2015). 귀농,귀촌정책 담론에 나타난 농촌성 표상 과정. 농촌사회, 25(1), 7-40.
22 Brohman, J. (1996). Popular development: rethinking the theory and practice of development, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
23 진양명숙, & 김주영. (2014). 도시민 농촌이주에 나타난 농촌성 담론 분석. 농촌사회, 24(2), 123-160.
24 홍성철. (1967). 근교농촌의 개발: 근교농촌 도시계획의 기본 전제. 도시문제, 2(9), 20-27.
25 Bradley, T., & Lowe, P. (1984). Introduction: Locality, rurality and social theory. In Bradley, T., & Lowe, P. (Eds.), Locality and rurality: Economy and society in rural regions, (pp.1-23). Norwich, UK: Geo Books.
26 Cloke, P., Milbourne, P., & Widdowfield, R. (2001). Interconnecting housing, homelessness and rurality: Evidence from local authority homelessness officers in England and Wales. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 99-111.   DOI
27 Jacquet, J., Guthrie, E., & Jackson, H. (2017). Swept out: Measuring rurality and migration intentions on the upper great plains. Rural Sociology, 82(4), 601-627.   DOI
28 Li, Y., Westlund, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies, 58, 135-143.
29 Pratt, A. (1996). Discourses of rurality: Loose talk or social struggle? Journal of Rural Studies, 12(1), 69-78.   DOI
30 조영재, 박지혜, 윤진옥, & 장동호. (2010). 도시근교 농촌지역의 실태 및 계획과제: 충남 아산시를 중심으로. 공주: 충남발전연구원.
31 Shen, S., Wang, H., Quan, Q., & Xu, J. (2019). Rurality and rural tourism development in China. Tourism Management Perspectives, 30, 98-106.   DOI
32 Shucksmith, M. (2018). Re-imagining the rural: From rural idyll to good countryside. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 163-172.   DOI
33 Thomas, M. (2018). Making a town: Urbanity, rurality, and the politics of place in Ebersbach(Fils), 1945-1989. Journal of Urban History, 44(6), 1062-1080.   DOI
34 Urry, J. (1984). Capitalist restructuring, recomposition and the region. In Bradley, T., & Lowe, P. (Eds.), Locality and rurality: Economy and society in rural regions (pp.45-65). Norwich, UK: Geo Books.
35 Willits, F. (1993). The rural mystique and tourism development: Data from Pennsylvania. Community Development, 24 (2), 159-174.   DOI
36 Woods, M. (2011). Rural. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
37 Zografos, C. (2007). Rurality discourses and the role of the social enterprise in regenerating rural Scotland. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 38-51.   DOI
38 유수상. (2016). 새로운 지역개발 가치로서의 '농촌성(Rurality)'의 모색과 정책적 시사점. In 유수상, 심재헌, 김정욱, 윤원근, 이종화, 박훈, 정재희, 한경원, 송미령, 양주필, 오형은, 임상봉, 황길식, 안옥선, 김상열 (Eds.), [제16차 농어촌지역정책포럼] 농촌성(Rurality)에 바탕을 둔 맞춤형 지역개발의 모색. 한국농촌경제연구원 연구자료. (3-20). 나주. 한국농촌경제연구원.