Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2019.26.2.0085

Factors Influencing Conflict Management of Forestry Recreation - Case of MTB Users -  

Shinn, Yun Ho (Seoul National University of Science & Technology)
Publication Information
Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development / v.26, no.2, 2019 , pp. 85-97 More about this Journal
Abstract
The conflict management of forest recreation, especially conflict management between hikers and MTB users, has drawn much attention as one of major issues in forest policy making. The main purpose of this study was to investigate hikers' conflict perception against MTB users and their attitudes toward the necessity of conflict management actions, and to identify factors influencing those attitudes. The research data were collected through online surveys of 644 men and women hikers who are aged 20 or older and not participating in MTB riding. The major findings of this study can be summarized as follows: First, the levels of goal interference and social value conflicts against MTB users were not so high, but rather, the awareness level of compatibility was much higher than that of conflict, and hikers' awareness level of safety risks posed by MTB users was also considerably high. Second, hikers' attitudes toward the necessity of conflict management actions were generally shown to be considerably positive, but those attitudes toward indirect management actions such as information, education, and compliance with norms of conduct, were significantly positive than those attitudes toward direct management measures such as zoning, enforcement, and regulations. Finally, the results of the multiple regression analysis showed that four factors that most significantly affect hikers' attitudes toward direct or indirect conflict management actions are behavioral norms conflict, safety risk, compatibility and age. Safety risks had most important influence on hikers' attitudes toward the direct management actions, but behavioral norms conflicts had most important influence on indirect management actions.
Keywords
forestry recreation; conflict management; social values conflict;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Brwon, R. N. K., Rosenberger, R. S., Kline, J. B., Hall, T. E., & Needham, M. D. (2008). Visitor preferences for managing wilderness recreation after wildfire. Journal of Forestry, 106(1), 9-16.
2 Carothers, P., Vaske, J. J., & Donnelly M. P. (2001). Social values versus interpersonal conflict among hikers and mountain bikers. Leisure Science, 23, 47-61.   DOI
3 Cessford, G. (2003). Perception and reality of conflict: Walkers and mountain bikes on the Queen Charlotte Track in New Zealand. Journal of Nature Conservation, 11(4), 310-316.   DOI
4 Chavez, D. J., Winter, P. L., & Baas, J. M. (1993). Recreation mountain biking: A management perspective. Journal of Park and recreational Administration, 11(3), 29-36.
5 주영민, & 박덕병 (2008). 농촌관광마을사업에 대한 관광 영향 지각 및 갈등이 주민참여에 미치는 영향. 농촌지도와 개발, 15(4), 577-597.
6 Chavez, D. J. (1996). Mountain biking: Issues and actions that USDA Forest Service managers. Pacific Southwest Research Station Research Paper PSW-RP_226. Albany, USDA Forest.
7 Cole, D. N., & Hall, T. E. (2008). Wilderness visitors, experiences, and management preferences: How they vary with use level and length of stay. Rocky Mountain Research Station Research Paper. Washington DC: USDA, Forest Service.
8 Handricks, B., Ruddell, E., & Bullis, C. (1993). Direct and indirect park and recreation resources management decision making: A conceptual approach. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 11, 28-39.
9 Hammitt, W. E., & Schneider, I. E. (2000). Recreation conflict management. In W. C. Gartner, & D. W. Lime, (Eds.), Trends in outdoor recreation, leisure and tourism (pp. 347-356). New York, NY: CABI Publishing.
10 Hidalgo, A. E. R., & Harshaw, H. (2010). Managing outdoor recreation conflict on The Squamish, British Columbia Trail Network. In Proceedings of the 2010 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium (pp. 134-140). GTR-NRS-P-94.
11 Jacob, G. R., & Shreyer, R. (1980). Conflict in outdoor recreation: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 12, 368-380.   DOI
12 Jackson, E. L., & Wong, R. A. G. (1982). Perceived conflict between urban cross-country skiers and snowmobilers in Alberta. Journal of Leisure Research, 14(2), 47-82.   DOI
13 Knopp, T. B., & Tyger, J. D. (1973). A study of conflict in recreational land use: Snowmobiling vs. ski-touring. Journal of Leisure Research, 5(3), 6-17.   DOI
14 Manning, R. E. (1999). Recreation conflict: Goal interference. In Manning R. E. (Ed.), Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction (pp. 194-206). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
15 Manning, R. E., & Valliere, W. (2001). Coping in outdoor recreation: Causes and consequences of crowding and conflict among community residents. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(4), 410-426.   DOI
16 Marcouiller, D. W. (2000). The compatability of timber production with forest-based recreation: Developing a basis for evaluating user conflicts (Working paper 00-01). Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Wisconsin: Madison, WI..
17 Marcouiller, D., Scott, I., & Prey, J. (2005a). Compatibility and conflict as a conceptual basis for outdoor recreation planning (Working paper 00-01). Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Wisconsin: Madison, WI.
18 Miller, A. D. (2015). Recreation conflict and management options in The Vail Pass Winter Recreation Area, Colorado, USA (Master's thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO).
19 Marcouiller, D., Scott, I., & Prey, J. (2005b). Addressing recreation conflict: Providing a conceptual basis for management (Working paper 00-01). Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Wisconsin: Madison, WI.
20 Martin, S. R., Marsolais, J., & Rolloff, D. (2009). Visitor perceptions of appropriate management actions across the recreation opportunity spectrum. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 27(1), 56-69.
21 Moore, R. L. (1994). Conflicts on multiple-use trails: Synthesis of the multiple-use trail literature and practice (Report No. FHWA-PD-94-031). Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration..
22 Roe, M., & Benson, J. (2001). Planning for conflict resolution: Jet-ski use on the northumberland coast. Coastal Management, 29(1): 19-39.   DOI
23 Shelby, B., Veske J. J., & Donnelly, M. P. (1996). Norms, standards, and natural resources. Leisure Sciences, 18(2): 103-123.   DOI
24 Tynon, J. F., & Gomez, E. (2012). Interpersonal and social values conflict among costal recreation activity groups in Hawaii. Journal of Leisure Research, 44, 531-543.   DOI
25 USDA Forest Service. (1986). 1986 ROS book. Washington, D.C.: USDA Forest Service.
26 Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., Wittmann, K., & Laidlaw, S. (1995). Interpersonal versus social value conflict. Leisure Sciences, 17(3), 205-222.   DOI
27 Vaske, J. J., Carothers, P., Donnelly, M. P., & Baird, B. (2000). Recreation conflict among skiers and snowboarders. Leisure Sciences, 22, 297-313.   DOI
28 Watson, A. E., Williams, D. R., & Daigle J. J. (1991). Sources of conflict between hikers and mountain bike riders in the Rattlesnake NRA. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 9(3), 59-71.
29 Vaske, J. J., Needham, M. D., & Cline, R. C. (2007). Clarifying interpersonal and social values conflict among recreationists. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(1), 182-195.   DOI
30 Watson, A. E., Niccolucci, M. J., & Williams, D. R. (1993). Hikers and recreational stocks users: Predicting and managing conflicts in three wildernesses. Intermountain Research Station Research Paper. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
31 Thapa, B., & Graefe, A. R. (2004). Recreation conflict and tolerance among skiers and snowboarders. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 22, 37-52.
32 산림청. (2016). 산림레포츠시설 운영 실태조사 및 매뉴얼 개발. 대전: 산림청.
33 국립산림과학원. (2013). 효율적인 숲길 조성.관리 및 숲길 거점 산촌지역 활성화 연구. 서울: 국립산림과학원.
34 김상오, & 김상미. (2011). 인구사회학적 특성 및 방문형태에 따른 등산객의 산악자전거에 의한 상충 인지-무등산 도립공원을 대상으로. 한국환경생태학회지, 25(5), 799-813.
35 박종구, & 박종선. (2009). 경주 보문단지 산책로의 레크리에이션 갈등, 극복행동, 규제방안. 경주연구, 18(1), 72-91.
36 이혜린, 김남조, & 이훈. (2013). 야외 레크리에이션 이용의 편견과 관용 및 갈등의 관계-MTB이용자를 조우한 등산객을 중심으로. 관광학연구, 37(9), 295-315.
37 양병화. (2006). 다변량 데이터 분석법의 이해. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스(주).
38 정은아. (2018. 05.16.). 강하고 가볍게... 자전거 재질로 '알루미늄' 대세. 다나와. Retrieved from http://dpg.danawa.com/news/view?boardSeq=293&listSeq=3629709#csidxfef449cb7721f69981614e957153cf8.
39 한국교통연구원. (2018). 자전거 이용 인구(2016). Retrieved from http://www.koti.re.kr/user/bbs/BD_selectBbsList.do?q_bbsCode=1012.
40 한혜란. (2018.10.1.). "단풍철 산 곳곳서 산악자전거-등산객 마찰..."차라리 전용로를"". 연합뉴스. Retrieved from http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/area/857447.html#csidxfb938d5a5d950e69718aca246c58102
41 Adelman, B. J. E., Heberlein, T. Q., & Bonnicksen, T. M. (1982). Social psychological explanations for the persistence of a conflict between paddling canoeists and motorcraft users in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Leisure Science, 5(1), 45-61.   DOI
42 Anderson, D. H., Lime, D. W., & Wang T. L. (1998). Maintaining the quality of park resources and visitors experience: A handbook for managers. St. Paul, MN: Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota.