Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2022.28.1.099

Residents' Perception and Evaluation of New Ruralism Using IPA - Focusing on the Regional Leader Group in Gochang-gun -  

Kim, Young-Jin (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University)
Son, Yong-hoon (Graduate school of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning / v.28, no.1, 2022 , pp. 99-108 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study measured the importance and satisfaction of the values related to 'New Ruralism' using the IPA(Importance-Performance Analysis) technique by the rural leaders' group. In the result, the satisfaction value was evaluated lower in the importance of 'landscape and ecological resource conservation', 'settlement environment', and 'population' related items. On the other hand, the items of 'tourism resource management', 'landscape damage', and 'landscape and ecological resource conservation' showed high satisfaction. Therefore, the leaders' group of Gochang-gun perceived the importance of local tourism image, landscape damage prevention, settlement environment, and rural landscape in 'New Ruralism' management. However, the leaders' group valued lower in the items of population, ecological value and natural and historical tourist sites. This seems to be a characteristic of the leaders' group mainly engaged in agriculture. Through factor analysis, the six items excluded from the analysis were considered important factors in 'New Ruralism' in Gochang-gun through a review of previous studies. Still, the leaders' group of Gochang-gun did not recognize them as important items in the rural resource. However, these items will be able to contribute to the development of 'New Ruralism' in Gochang-gun, and it is necessary to improve the awareness of the leader group. Even if local governments or experts present an ideal goal for rural development, it is difficult to achieve the goals if there is a difference from the perception of residents. Therefore, it is important to understand the perception of 'New Ruralism' of the leaders' group who plays an important role in regional development projects.
Keywords
New Ruralism; Ruralism; Rurality; Importance Performance Analysis(IPA); Residents' Perception; Rural Development;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Newman, G. and Saginor, J.(2016). Priorities for advancing the concept of new ruralism. Sustainability, 8(3), 269.   DOI
2 OECD(2018). Rural 3.0: A Framework for Rural Development.
3 Oh, M. and Ryu, J.(2016). Comparison between traditional IPA and revised IPA: An attractiveness evaluation of Incheon Chinatown, IJTHR, 30(7), 129-142.
4 Park, K. and Lee, H.(2009). Residents' Participation and Satisfaction of the Altered Environment in the Development of Rural Agricultural Area, KIRUA, 11(1), 57-66.
5 Park, S. and Kim, J.(2016). A study on residents' awareness of functions and facilities of the rural centers: Myeon locations in Hwasun-gun, Jeollanam-do Province, KIRUA, 18(2), 19-28.
6 Rye, J. F.(2006). Rural youths' images of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(4), 409-421.   DOI
7 Ryu, S. and Kim, H.(2012). Residents' Perceptions and Support for Community Development: A Case Study of Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project, Tourism Research, 37, 249-266.
8 Van Berkel, D. B. and Verburg, P. H.(2014). Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Indicators, 37, 163-174.   DOI
9 Jones, O.(1995). Lay discourses of the rural: developments and implications for rural studies. Journal of rural studies, 11(1), 35-49.   DOI
10 Jung, H.(2014). Valuing Amenity attributes of Farm Village using Choice Experiment: Valuing Rurality, KSRP, 20(4), 243-251.
11 Kim, J. and Gim, U.(2013). Review and Proposal of Central place Improvement Project in Basic Settlement Area-Centered on Comprehensive Improvement Project of the Seat of Eup(Dong)Myon, JKRDA, 25(4), 133-152.
12 Jung, C. and Ahn, J.(2015). A Study on the Recognition of the Residential Environments Connected to Local Central Cities: Focusing on Gyeongnam Area of the West, REIK, 13(2), 41-52.
13 Willits, F. K., Bealer, R. C. and Timbers, V. L.(1990). Popular images of "Rurality": Data from a Pennsylvania survey. Rural Sociology, 55(4), 559-578.   DOI
14 Willits, F. K. and Luloff, A. E.(1995). Urban Residents' Views of Rurality and Contacts with Rural Places 1. Rural Sociology, 60(3), 454-466.   DOI
15 Arriaza, M., Canas-Ortega, J. F., Canas-Madueno, J. A. and Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and urban planning, 69(1), 115-125.   DOI
16 Caschili, S., De Montis, A. and Trogu, D.(2015). Accessibility and rurality indicators for regional development. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 98-114.   DOI
17 Deng, W.(2007). Using a revised importance performance analysis approach: The case of Taiwanese hot springs tourism. Tourism Management, 28(5), 1274-1284.   DOI
18 Viviers, J., Comelius, S. G. & Cilliers, E. J.(2017). Considering New Urbanism, New Ruralism and Green Urbanism in Response to Multifunctionality: The Case of Verkykerskop, South Africa. WIT Transations on Ecology and the Environment. 223, 73-87.
19 Azadi, H., Veronique, V., Acker, V., Zarafshani, K. and Witlox, F.(2012). Food Systems: New-Ruralism versus New-Urbanism, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 92(11), 2224-2226.   DOI
20 Ahn, D., Son, J. and Kim, M.(2005). Rurality and Preferences of Rural Landscape in Korea: A Comparison of Evaluations by Koreans and Foreigners, KSRP, 11(3), 43-52.
21 Natori, Y. and Chenoweth, R.(2008). Differences in rural landscape perceptions and preferences between farmers and naturalists. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(3), 250-267.   DOI
22 Ocana-Riola, R. and Sanchez-Cantalejo, C.(2005). Rurality index for small areas in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 73(2), 247-266.   DOI
23 Park, S., Lee, D. and Yun, S.(2002). Meanings and Measurement Scale Development on Rurality, Revisit and Recommendation, Journal of Rural Tourism, 9(1), 22-37.
24 Rogge, E., Nevens, F. and Gulinck, H.(2007). Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics. Landscape and urban planning, 82(4), 159-174.   DOI
25 Jeong, C. and Seo, Y.(2010). Re-examination of Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA) used in Tourism Studies in Korea, Tourism Research Institute Hanyang University, 22(1), 119-137.
26 Lee, S.(2019). The Evolvement of Discourse and the Establishment of Conceptional System on Rurality and Ruralness, KSRP, 25(4), 129-149.
27 Ko, A., Kim, Y., Kim, Y. and Kim, S.(2020). Landscape Characteristics of Mountain Villages Recognized by Residents: Focusing on Importance-Performance Analysis, KSRP, 26(2), 1-12.
28 Moffat, D.(2006). New ruralism: Agriculture at the metropolitan edge [dispatch]. Places, 18(2).
29 Garcia-Llorente, M., Martin-Lopez, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., Lopez-Santiago, C. A., Aguilera, P. A. and Montes, C.(2012). The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: an ecosystem service approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 19, 136-146.   DOI
30 Kim, H., Na, S., Shin, Y. and Cho, J.(2019). A Study on The Operational Activation of the Facilities in the Rural Development Project: A Focus on the IPA on The Project Selection Factor and The Operation of a Business, KSRP, 25(1), 89-97.
31 Kraus, S. (2006). A call for new ruralism. Institute of Urban & Regional Development New Ruralism Initiative.
32 KREI(2020). Review and evaluation report on the implementation plan for improvement of the quality of life of farmers and fishermen in 2020 and development of rural areas.
33 Lee, C., Lim, J., Lee, S. and Yun, S.(2019). Development and importance analysis of evaluation factors for formation of future-oriented rural residential environment: using network analysis and AHP analysis, KSRP, 25(2), 89-98.
34 Lee, C. H.(2020). Understanding rural landscape for better resident-led management: Residents' perceptions on rural landscape as everyday landscapes. Land Use Policy, 94, 104565.   DOI
35 Lee, J., Jeong, Y. and Im, S.(2006). A Study on the Assessment of Rurality Characteristics in Rural Amenity Resources, KSRP, 12(2), 1-9.
36 Lee, J. and Lee, S.(2003). Analysis on the Factors Motivation the Residents' Participation in Sustainable Rural Village Program, JKPA, 38(3), 39-55.
37 Li, Y., Long, H. and Liu, Y.(2015). Spatio-temporal pattern of China's rural development: A rurality index perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 38, 12-26.   DOI
38 MAFRA(2018). Major Business Plan for 2018: A Country that Farming without Worrying, and Consuming Safely.
39 MAFRA(2019). 2020-2021 Rural Agreement Promotion Plan.
40 Song, M. and Seong, J.(2004). Evaluation of Rural Village Development Programs and Suggestions for Participatory Village Development Model, KREI.
41 Kim, Y., Song, G., Lee, D. and Son, Y.(2021a). Rural Tourism Image and Major Activity Space in Gochang County Shown in Social Data: Focusing on the Keyword 'Gochang-gun Travel', KSRP, 27(3), 103-116.
42 Kim, Y., Lee, S. and Son, Y.(2021b). Changes and Applications of Rural Tourism in the Post-COVID-19 Era through Social Data Analysis, KSRP, 27(4), 43-54.
43 Son, Y. and Kim, Y.(2019). The Image of Ruralism in Korea through a Text Mining for Online News Media Analysis, KSRP, 25(4), 13-26.
44 Haartsen, T., Groote, P. and Huigen, P. P.(2003). Measuring age differentials in representations of rurality in The Netherl ands. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(2), 245-252.   DOI
45 Pratt, A. C.(1996). Discourses of rurality: loose talk or social struggle?. Journal of Rural Studies, 12(1), 69-78.   DOI
46 Kim, Y. and Son, Y.(2017). The Residents' Perceptions on the Revitalization Project of Rural Centers utilizing IPA: The Case of Janggye-myeon of Jangsu-gun, KSRP, 23(3), 133-145.
47 Kim, Y. and Son, Y.(2018). Features of the Rural Revitalization Projects in Jang-su County Using LDA Topic Analysis of News Data: Focused on Keyword of Tourism and Livelihood, KSRP, 24(4), 69-80.
48 Lee, D. and Son, Y.(2021). A Study on the Concept of Korean Ruralism: Focusing on the Comparison of Research on Ruralism and Rurality in Korea, KSRP, 27(3), 69-84.
49 Carlow, V. M.(2016). Ruralism. The Future of Villages and Small Towns in an Urbanizing World, Berlin: Jovis.
50 Bae, S., Kim, D., Kim, S., Kim, S., Lee, Y., Kim, Y., Shin, Ji., Jung, N., Choi, Y., Park, J., Shin, M., Lee, Da. and Im, S.(2019). Demand Analysis of Services and Infrastructure for Rural Welfare and Culture by Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA), KSRP, 25(1), 113-125.
51 Murdoch, J. and Pratt, A. C.(1993). Rural studies: modernism, postmodernism and the 'post-rural'. Journal of Rural Studies, 9(4), 411-427.   DOI
52 Cloke, P.(1987). Rurality and change: some cautionary notes. Journal of Rural Studies, 3(1), 71-76.   DOI
53 Cloke, P. and Milbourne, P.(1992). Deprivation and lifestyles in rural Wales.-II. Rurality and the cultural dimension. Journal of Rural Studies, 8(4), 359-371.   DOI
54 Johansen, P. H. and Nielsen, N. C.(2012). Bridging between the regional degree and the community approaches to rurality: A suggestion for a definition of rurality for everyday use. Land Use Policy, 29(4), 781-788.   DOI
55 Ma, S. and Swinton, S. M.(2011). Valuation of ecosystem services from rural landscapes using agricultural land prices. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1649-1659.   DOI
56 Matzler, K., Bailom, F., HinterHinterhuber, H. H., Renzl, B. and Pichler, J.(2004). The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance & overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(4), 271-277.   DOI