Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2018.24.3.063

Issue Difference of Ecosystem Service Demand and Supply through Text Mining Analysis: Case Study of Shiheung using Complaints and Urban Planning Materials  

Lee, Jae-hyuck (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
Park, Hong-jun (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
Kim, Il-kwon (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
Kwon, Hyuk-soo (Bureau of Ecological Research, Division of Ecosystem Services & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning / v.24, no.3, 2018 , pp. 63-71 More about this Journal
Abstract
The comparison of demand and supply is needed for efficient ecosystem services planning. However, the gap between them cannot be analyzed as existing studies mainly dealt with only the supply of ecosystem services. This study compares the demand and supply of ecosystem services in Shiheung using environmental complaints and urban planning by semantic network analysis. As a result, 'air' and 'water' quality are magnified in demand, 'energy' and 'water' are crucial in supply. This result presents that citizen ask for the improvement of air quality in regulation services, although local government has plans for energy support in provisioning services. Periodic ecosystem services demand and supply monitoring will be the base of effective ecosystem services planning, which reduce insufficiency and surplus.
Keywords
Demand Analysis; Semantic Network; Environmental Complaint; Urban Planning; Air; Energy;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Coussement K & Van den Poel D. 2008. Improving customer complaint management by automatic email classification using linguistic style features as predictors. Decision Support Systems. 44(4): 870-882.   DOI
2 Doerfel ML & Barnett GA. 1999. A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human communication research. 25(4): 589-603.   DOI
3 Engel S, Pagiola S & Wunder S. 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological economics. 65(4): 663-674.   DOI
4 Farber SC, Costanza R & Wilson MA. 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological economics. 41(3): 375-392.   DOI
5 Fisher B & Turner RK. 2008. Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biological conservation. 141(5): 1167-1169.   DOI
6 Fisher B, Turner RK & Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological economics. 68(3): 643-653.   DOI
7 Fornell C & Wernerfelt B. 1987. Defensive marketing strategy by customer complaint management: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Marketing research. 337-346.
8 Gamfeldt L, Hillebrand H, & Jonsson PR. 2008. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology. 89(5): 1223-1231.   DOI
9 Gross-Camp ND, Martin A, McGuire S, Kebede B, & Munyarukaza J. 2012. Payments for ecosystem services in an African protected area: exploring issues of legitimacy, fairness, equity and effectiveness. Oryx. 46(1): 24-33.   DOI
10 Hsu C, Park SJ, & Park HW. 2013. Political discourse among key Twitter users: The case of Sejong city in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia. 12(1): 65-79.   DOI
11 MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Synthesis. A report of the Millenium Ecosystem Assesment: Island Press whashington.
12 Kroll F, Müller F, Haase D, & Fohrer N. 2012. Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land use policy. 29(3): 521-535.   DOI
13 Li SY, Xie SB, Zhou YH, Wu WL & Duan Y. 2012. Discussion on the Water Supply Engineering Planning of Small Towns in Southern China. Paper presented at the Applied Mechanics and Materials.
14 Liu SJ, & Xu H. 2012. Study on Water Supply and Drainage Facility Planning in Historic Towns-Case Study of Master Plan of Hengdaohezi Town. Paper presented at the Applied Mechanics and Materials.
15 Nahlik AM, Kentula ME, Fennessy MS, & Landers DH. 2012. Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecological economics. 77: 27-35.   DOI
16 Redford KH & Adams WM. 2009. Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conservation biology. 23(4): 785-787.   DOI
17 National Institute of Ecology. 2017. Ecosystem Service Assessment with Local Resident : Case of Shiheung. National Institute of Ecology: Seocheon.
18 National Nature Trust [cited 2018 Jun 15]. Available from: http://trust.or.kr/cooper2
19 Nedkov S & Burkhard B. 2012. Flood regulating ecosystem services - Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators. 21: 67-79.   DOI
20 Sahle M, Saito O, Fürst C & Yeshitela K. 2018. Quantification and mapping of the supply of and demand for carbon storage and sequestration service in woody biomass and soil to mitigate climate change in the socio-ecological environment. Science of The Total Environment. 624: 342-354.   DOI
21 Tax SS, Brown SW & Chandrashekaran M. 1998. Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: implications for relationship marketing. The journal of marketing. 60-76.
22 Schnegg M & Bernard HR. 1996. Words as actors: A method for doing semantic network analysis. CAM Journal. 8(2): 7-10.
23 Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S & Schmidt S. 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of applied Ecology. 48(3): 630-636.   DOI
24 Sommerville M, Jones JP, Rahajaharison M & Milner-Gulland E. 2010. The role of fairness and benefit distribution in community-based Payment for Environmental Services interventions: A case study from Menabe, Madagascar. Ecological economics. 69(6): 1262-1271.   DOI
25 Chen X, Lupi F, He G, Ouyang Z, & Liu J. 2009. Factors affecting land reconversion plans following a payment for ecosystem service program. Biological conservation. 142(8): 1740-1747.   DOI
26 Yoshimura N & Hiura T. 2017. Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: Use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido. Ecosystem Services. 24: 68-78.   DOI
27 Barral MP & Oscar MN. 2012. Land-use planning based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study in the Southeast Pampas of Argentina. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 154: 34-43.   DOI
28 Bateman IJ, Mace GM, Fezzi C, Atkinson G, & Turner K. 2011. Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental and Resource Economics. 48(2): 177-218.   DOI
29 Boyd J & Banzhaf S. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological economics. 63(2-3): 616-626.   DOI
30 Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, & Müller F. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators. 21: 17-29.   DOI
31 Cho SE & Park HW. 2012. Government organizations’ innovative use of the Internet: The case of the Twitter activity of South Korea’s Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Scientometrics. 90(1): 9-23.   DOI
32 Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, Van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global environmental change. 26: 152-158.   DOI