Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2015.21.2.063

A Study on Evaluation of the Rurality by the Distance of View  

Shin, Min-Ji (Dankook Univ. Graduate School)
Shin, Ji-Hoon (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning / v.21, no.2, 2015 , pp. 63-77 More about this Journal
Abstract
Improve the rural views of the Government and the municipalities with the intention of rural landscape planning. However, rural scenery evaluation of landscape types and element categories, landscape scenes, such as the valuation of resources selected, form a coherent system and ecological point of view is not only a Visual perspective of evaluation, or evaluation is made. This study evaluates the rural landscape through the rural landscape for rurality is implemented can explain the image. Rural amenity 100 represented the rural landscape in rurality with photos of photos, and scenes, photos, location-based rural Vista rurality landscapes drawn components. Selected landscape photography scenic landscapes in the u.s. survey and image vocabularies through surveys is representative of the landscape in rurality of each Vista location-specific photos and images began extracted factors. As a result, the Distant view is a town and village in the rolling hills of the surrounding environment is an image behind the Vista Skyline, Farmland Rural village forests, Behind the hills, Individual housing roof, Housing arrangement, The number of household includes landscape components. Factor analysis 'openness', 'intimacy', 'activity', 'complexity', 'safety' was down to five factors, such as a description of the overall factors that force was 66.45 percent. Middle distance view is close to being out of town houses and village environment, an image in the skyline hills Vista, farmlands, village forests, rolling hills, behind the scenes of the housing component of the neck, the sperm will honor an individual factor analysis results are 'intimacy', 'safety', 'openness', 'specificity', 'complexity' five factors the whole description of the capacity factors compared to 67.24 percent. Close-range view is mainly in Vista village embraced the individual elements and an image of a harmonious location in the surroundings of the sperm, individual houses, fences, gates, courtyard, Garden, garage, agricultural facilities, including, but not limited to, factors assay but an 'intimacy', 'complexity', 'safety', 'activity', 'openness' five factors, such as a description of the overall factors that force was 65.29%. This research seeks to determine the extent to which rurality of rural landscape Vista by location attributes and elements and representative officer in photo selection and rurality to extract the image. To date, followed by a comprehensive study, which was presented through the readjustment could not overlook the Visual elements. The future rural development officer for the evaluation of rural landscape classification and quantitative and objective assessment will have to come up with ways to do.
Keywords
Rural Landscape; Rurality; Landscape Evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 9  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Arriaza; M., et al. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning 69 , 115-125.   DOI
2 Ban, Yong Un, Kim, Min Ah, Jung, Jae Ho, Baek, Jong In, 2008, Evaluating Subjective Landscape of Rural Region Using Additive Integration Index Calculation Model: Focused on Seondong Region, Gochang-Gun, Jeollabuk-Do, Korea, Journal of Korean Society of rural planning, 15(2), pp.27-42.
3 Ban, Yong Un, Lee, Tae Ho, Baek, Jong In, Kim, Min Ah, 2012, Selecting Representative Landscape Adjectives in Accordance with Landscape Units and Space Types. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 15(2), pp. 95-101
4 Baek, Jong In, Ban, Yong Un, Woo, Hye Mi, Choi, Na Rae, 2010, An Evaluation of Rural Landscape and Comparative Analysis in Accordance with Space Types : Focused on Residents and Visitors of Seondong Region, Gochang-Gun, Jeollabuk-Do, Korea, Journal of Korean Society of rural planning, 16(4), pp.1-11.
5 Choi, Eun Young, 2011, Rural and Urban
6 Feimer, N. R.1979, Personality and Environment Perception: Alternative Predictive Systems and Implications for Evaluative Judgements, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkely.
7 Im, Jae Hyun, 2002, Study of Images of the Skyline Landscape by Type And Quantitative Analysis of Evaluation Factors, Graduate School Chon-nam National University Master's Thesis.
8 Im, Seung Bin, 1991, 경관분석론, 서울:서울대학교출판부
9 Im, Seung Bin, Shin, Ji Hoon, 1996, A Study on the Psychological Evaluation Indicators for the Landscape Impact Assessment, Architectural institute of korea, 12(5) pp.153-161.
10 Joo, Shin Ha, 2003, A Study on the selection and the application of landscape adjectives for the urban landscape analysis : Focused on the GwaCheon and Yaksoo district area, Graduate of School Seoul National University Doctorate Thesis.
11 Kang, Young Eun, 2012, A study on the transitional characteristics of rural landscape in Korea, Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture Graduate School Seoul National University Doctorate Thesis.
12 Kim, Jung Sub, 2001, Rural development and amenity: Discuss the trends and implications of international, Agroinfo Issue, pp.1-10.
13 Kim, Choung Hee, Kim, Dong Chan, 2010, A study on the Visual identity of Rural Landscape -Focusing on the Comparison between Urban and Rural Residents-, Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 16(4), pp.23-32.
14 Kim, Chul Jae, 2011, A Study on the Classification of the Natural Funeral Landscape Facilities and Its Visual Preference, Graduate School of Pai-chai University Dae-jeon, Korea. Doctorate Thesis.
15 Kim, Han Soo, Oh, Choong Hyeon, 2011 Classification of rural villages based on Landscape Indices - Focusing on Landscape Ecological Aspects -, Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 17(3), pp.1-13.   DOI
16 Kim, keun-sung, 2012, A Study on The Residential Environment Planning for Rural Village Activity : Focusing on Yangpo Village, Residential Environment Institute of Korea, 10(3), pp.47-59.
17 Kim, Sang Bum, Rhee, Sang Young, 2006, Key Landscape Elements in Constituent Spaces of Rural Village Area - Centered on Rural Traditional Theme Village-, Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 12(3), pp.13-18.
18 Kim, Yong Soo, Park, Chan Yong, 2007, Applying of Indicators for Landscape Planning in Building Lots Development District around Urban Fringe, Journal of Korean Society of rural planning, 13(3), pp.51-60.
19 Kim, Yu Mi, 2011, (A) Study on the Eco-Geomorphological and Aesthetical Evaluation of Urban Stream Landscape. Graduate School of Chonnam National University Master's Thesis.
20 Lee, Dong Kun, Yoon, Eun Joo, Kim, Eun Young, Cho, Soon Jae, 2007, A Study on Rural Landscape Assessment Based on Rural Amenity Resources, Journal of Korean Society of rural planning, 13(1), pp.11-17.
21 Lim, Hyung Baek, 2001, A Study on the Concept, the Origin and History, and Classification of Amenity, Korean J. of Ag Extension, 8(2), pp.191-199.
22 Lee, Jeung Won, Jeong, Yoon Hee, Im, Seung Bin, 2005, A Study on the Assessment of Rurality Characteristics in Rural Amenity Resources, Journal of Korean Society of rural planning, 12(2), pp.1-9.
23 Lim, Chang Su, Choi, Soo Myung, Kim, Young Joo, 2006, A Classification System of Amenity / Disamenity Elements in Rural Villages, Journal of Korean Society of rural planning, 12(4), pp.89-97.
24 Lim, Chang Su, Choi, Soo Myung, Kim, Young Joo, Cho, Young Jae, 2007, A Rating Tabulation System of Amenity / Disamenity Elements in Rural Villages, Journal of Korean Society of rural planning, 13(2), pp.27-38.
25 Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, 2012, 농어촌경관계획 수립요령
26 OECD, 1999, Cultivating Rural Amenities: A Economic Development Perspective, Paris, OECD.
27 Park, Chang Sug, Jeon, Young Ok, Joh, Young Kug, 2002, An Analysis of their Importance Degree and Ordinal Correlation of Rural Resources for the Rural Amenity, Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association, 37(6), pp.21-35.
28 Park, Chang Won, Kwon, Hueck Jung, Joo Kyung Ro, 2004, Resource Evaluation Skill to Set a Development Direction Rural Village , Journal of Korean Society of rural planning, 10(1), 9-17
29 Park, Cho Rong, 2012, A study on image formation ofr urban and rural areas'residential scenery type, Graduate School Chung-nam National University Master's Thesis.
30 Presidential Commission on Architecture Policy, 2012, 농어촌 경관의 실증적 연구를 통한 제도개선방안
31 Rural Development Administration, 2007, 농촌경관지표, 농촌경관맵 및 경관보전협약의 현장적용성 연구
32 Ra, Jung Hwa, Cho, Hyun Ju, Kim, Jin Hyo, Kwon,,Oh Sung, 2013, The Development and Application of Landscape Ecological Planning Model based on Biotop Mapping, Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 19(4), pp.17-32.   DOI
33 Rural Development Administration, 2004, 농촌계획 수립을 위한 경관가치의 평가 및 활용방안 연구
34 Rural Development Administration, 2005, 농촌 어메니티 자원을 활용한 사례별 농촌마을 모형 설계
35 Ryu, Ji Seon, 2012, A Study on the extraction of vocabulary and image analysis for evaluating and rural landscape, Gradute School Chung-nam National University Master's Thesis.
36 Suh, Joo Hwan, Choi, Hyeon Sang, Lee, Jun Geun, 2002, Landscape Valuation by Fabricating Facotrs of Induction in Rural Landscape -The case of Rural Culture Village-, Journal of the Korea Forest Recreation Welfare, 6(4), pp.1-7.