Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.4.243

Valuing Amenity attributes of Farm Village using Choice Experiment - Valuing Rurality-  

Jung, Hyunhee (Chungnam Development Institute, CDI)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning / v.20, no.4, 2014 , pp. 243-252 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study strengthens importance of farm land has possessed rurality. Thus the amenities of farm village were offered to the symbolical attributes of rurality and it was extracted four amenities attributes for valuing the amenities. Possessing the importance of rurality for agricultural and rural development and rural tourism evaluated each attribute by Choice Experiment(CE) for sustainable development make full use of rurality. Applying for Conditional-Logit model estimated the value of attributes then consumer's benefit feeling form each attributes was offered to the value of a unit change. Through this study, I wish to apply for the direction of rural development as important material and the compensation in the operation of agricultural output offering social benefit as political reference materials.
Keywords
Rurality; Choice Experiment(CE); Sustainable; Rural Amenity; Rural Tourism; CRM; Valuing Farming Village; Endogenous Development; Multifunctional Agriculture; Multifunctionality of Agriculture; Externality; Diversity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kwon, Oh Sang, Lim, Young Ah, Kim, Won Hee, 2007, Economic Values of Recreational Water : Rafting on the Hantan River, Korean Resource Economics Association, 16(3), pp.427-451.
2 Kwon, Oh Sang, Yun, Tae Yeon, 2004, Amenity Value of Rice Farming, Korea Agricultural Economics Association, 45(2), pp. 235-261.
3 Louviere, J, J., 1988a, Conjoint Analysis Modeling of Stated Preferences, Riview of Economics and Policy, 10, pp.93-119.
4 OECD, 1994, The contribution of amenities to rural development, Paris, OECD.
5 OECD, 1999, Cultivating Rural Amenities, An Economic Development Perspective, Paris OECD.
6 OECD, 2001, Multifunctionality, Toward an Analytical Framework, Paris, OECD.
7 Oh, Yun Gyeong, Cho, Soon Jae, Choi, Jin Yong, Im, Seung Bin, Ahn, Tong Mahn, Lee, Jeong Jae, Lee, Dong Kun, 2007, Rural Amenity Resources Survey, Journal of Korean society of rural planning, 13(1), pp.1-9.   과학기술학회마을
8 Park, Chang-Sug, Jeon, Young-Ok, Joh, Young-Kug, 2002, An Analysis of their Importance Degree and Ordinal Correlation of Rural Resources for the Rural Amenity, Korea Planners Association, 37(6), pp.21-35.
9 Sakai Kenichi, 1998, Practical Ideas Beyond Environmental, AMR.
10 Statistics Korea, 2010, Population Projection.
11 Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J. and Williams, M., 1994, Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26, pp. 271-279.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Ahn, Tong Mahn, Son, Ju Dong, Kim, Myung Soo, 2005, Rurality and Preferences of Rural Landscapes in Korea, Journal of Korean society of rural planning 11(3), pp.43-52.   과학기술학회마을
13 Ahn, Yoon Soo, Kim, Eun Ja, Kim, Young, Seo, Chung Ho, 2005, Monetary Valuation of the Sociocultural Commonweal Functions From the Rural Communities in Korea, The Korean Rural Sociological Society, 5(1), pp.175-213.
14 Bergstrom, J.C., B.L. Dillman, and J.R. Stoll, 1985, Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The case of Prime Agriculture Land, Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 17, pp.139-149.
15 Hanley, N., Wright, R.E and W. Adamowicz, 1998 Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment, Environmental and Resource Economics, 11, pp. 413-428.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Hensher, D. A., 1994, Stated Preference Analysis of Travel Choices, The State of Practice, Transportation, 21, pp.107-133.   DOI
17 Jeon, Young Ok, 2003, The Direction of Agricultural Amenity For Agricultural Economic Activity, SERI.
18 Kim, Kwang Im, Park, Young Ha, Choi, Jae Young, Park, Je Keun, Park, So Yeon, 2006, Method for Valuing scenery and Management of Agriculture, KEI, pp, 1-204
19 Kim, Samg Bum, Rhee, Sang-Young, Jung, Nam Su, Lee, Ji-min, Cho, Soon Jae, Lee, Jeong Jae, 2004, Standardized Surveying Method of Rural Amenity Resources with Database Normalization Technique, Korean Society of Rural Planning, 10(4), pp. 1-7.   과학기술학회마을
20 Kim, Su Suk, Oh, Se Ik, 2003, Valuation of Agricultural Multifunctionality, Journal or Rural Development, 23(2), pp. 1-13.
21 Choi, Young-Wan, Kim, Young-Joo, 2012, Remodelling of Amenity Resources Classification System Based on Structural Characteristics of Rural Territory, Journal of Korean society of rural planning 18(1), pp.1-8.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
22 Krinsky, I. And A. Robb, 1986, On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities, Review of Economics and Statistics 86, pp.715-719.
23 Kwon, Oh Sang, 2007, Environmental Economics second edition, Park Young.