Browse > Article

The Type Classification and Characteristic Analysis of Biotope in Rural Areas  

Cho, Hyun-Ju (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of Kyungpook National University)
Ra, Jung-Hwa (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University)
SaGong, Jung-Hee (Environmental and Ecological Research Department, Chung-nam Development Institute)
Ryu, Yeon-Su (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning / v.15, no.4, 2009 , pp. 19-32 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research has a significant meaning to break from the urban ecology-oriented biotope research and realize the importance of rural landscape as a reserve area for systemizing the types of rural biotope. The results are as follows. First of all, items for classification of 16 rural biotope areas are designed and total 9 itmes in slope from spatial structural point of view and 7 items in minute-variety from functional point of view. Also, as the result of on-site research on case areas based on classified items, there are 46 types of rural biotope such as coniferous forest, hedgerow and so on. For example, it is proven that uncultivated stripe showed the most frequent emergence. As a result of cluster analysis of average linkage method between clusters, 12 clusters are classified as a clusters and 13 biotope types are re-corrected and complemented through brainstorming process and then total 12 clusters are selected as final rural biotope type groups. As a rural biotope type cluster and character analysis according to types based on on-site research and documentary survey, for example, it is analyzed that the ratio of transmissible covering ratio is 100%, the ratio of green coverage is 90% in 'woodland in cultivated area biotope type cluster'.
Keywords
rural landscape; hedgerow; cluster analysis; biotope type groups; woodland in cultivated area;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 광양시, 2006, 생태지도(Biotop Map) 및 현황도 제작 연구보고서
2 류연수, 2000, 도시 비오톱의 평가지표 설정, 경북대학교 석사학위논문
3 서울특별시, 2005, 도시생태현황도 정비, 165-176
4 성남시, 2001, 도시생태현황도(Biotop Map)제작 및 GIS 구축사업(1차년도) 연구보고서
5 한국토지공사, 2007, 대구신서 생태환경계획 수립, 23-77
6 Andre, B. L. and J. Ahern, 2002, Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning, Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 65-93   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Bernd, M., B. Nygaard, R. Ejrnæs and H. G. Bruun, 2001, A biotope landscape model for prediction of semi-natural vegetation in Denmark, Eclological Modelling, 139, 221-233   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Davis, J. C., 1986, Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology, New York: John Wiley
9 Laura R. M. and R. N. Coulson, 2001, Landscape ecological planning process for wetland, waterfowl, and farmland conservation, Landscape and Urban Planning, 56, 125-147   DOI   ScienceOn
10 나정화, 채인홍, 사공정희, 류연수, 2003, 도시계획 지역 내 농경지의 잔여경관요소에 대한 경관생태학적 평가 및 보존 방안, 한국조경학회지, 31(5), 31-42
11 김근호, 조동범, 김미향, 2006, 비오톱유형에 의한 농촌생태마을의 경관생태학적 특성분석-환경부지정 생태마을 중 전남 일부 지역을 대상으로-, 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지, 9(6), 63-77
12 김귀곤, 2000, 21세기 생태환경 조성을 위한 새로운 조경기법, 서울, 도서출판 누리에
13 윤광성, 2007, 묵논 습지의 토양 및 식생 특성, 한국지역지리학회지, 13(2), 129-142
14 Nakamura, T., 2000, Traditional agriculture landscape as an inportant model of ecological restoration in Japan, Natural History Museum & Institute
15 Patton, D. R., 1975, A diversity index for quantifying habitat edge, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 394, 171-173
16 최일기, 오충현, 이은희, 2008, 전국적 적용을 위한 비오톱유형분류 제안, 한국환경생태학회지, 22(6), 666-678
17 조영동, 1998, 도시 생태계 보전을 위한 비오토프맵핑의 적용과 활용방안에 관한 연구-수치지도의 도입과 GIS활용을 중심으로-, 서울대학교 석사학위논문
18 Edward, A. C., 2002, Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks, Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, 269-280   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Forman, R. T. T., 2000, Estimate of the area affected ecologically by the road system in the United. Conservation Biology, 14, 31-35   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Schonewald-Cox, C. and J. W. Bayless, 1986, The boundary model: a geographic analysis of design and conservation of nature reserves, Biological Conservation, 38, 305-322   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Sukopp, H. and I. Kowarik, 1990, Urban ecology: Plants and Plant Communities in Urban Environments, The Hague, Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing
22 조현주, 나정화, 2008, 경작지 내 소규모 수림의 경관생태적 특성 분석, 경북대학교농학지, 26, 17-22
23 환경부, 2009, 환경부 차세대 핵심환경기술개발사업, 비오톱 유형별 보전 및 복원기법 개발 2차년도 보고서
24 Forys, E. and S. R. Humphrey, 1999, The importance of patch attributes and context to the management and recovery of an endangered lagomorph, Landscape Ecology, 14, 177-185   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Sara A.O. C. and M. Ihse, 1998, A methodological study for biotope and landscape mapping based on CIR aerial photographs, Landscape and Urban Planning, 41, 183-19   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Naveh, Z. and A. Lieberman, 1994, Landscape ecology: Theory and application, New York: Springer-Verlag
27 창원시, 2009, 창원시 환경지도 제작 및 GIS구축 연구용역(1단계), 창원시.창원대학교 산학협력단
28 Forman, R. T. T., 1995, Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions, Cambridge University Press
29 노형진, 2005, SPSS 12.0에 의한 조사방법 및 통계분석, 서울, 형설출판사
30 서울특별시, 2000, 도시생태 개념의 도시계획에의 적용을 위한 서울시 비오톱 현황조사 및 생태도시조성지침수립-1차년도 보고서-, 48
31 Kaerkes, W., 1986, Zur oekologischen Bedeutung urbaner Freiflaechen, Diss. Univ. Bochum, pp. 281-284