Browse > Article

Analysis of Information Adoption Pathways and Strategies of Raising Information Adoption of Farmers  

Choi, Sang-Ho (Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning / v.15, no.1, 2009 , pp. 73-87 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study analyzed the characteristics of diverse information adoption pathways per pathway of information composition category including 'information perception', 'information assessment', and 'information adoption' and examined information adoption characteristics per pattern. In addition, differences among agricultural researchers and farmers per information adoption stage were analyzed. According to these analyses, as for farmers' information adoption pathways, while the formal extension type and the situational reaction diffusion type used the direct pathway of 'information perception ${\rightarrow}$ information adoption,'the agriculturist connection type and the systematic approach type did not use the direct pathway of 'information perception ${\rightarrow}$ information adoption' but, instead, adopted information by moving from the 'information perception ${\rightarrow}$ information assessment' pathway to the 'information assessment ${\rightarrow}$ information adoption' pathway, with information assessment as the intermediation. In the case of farmers, information adoption was the highest in comparison with information assessment and information perception in all patterns whereas, in the case of agricultural researchers, the results were exactly opposite those of farmers. By suggesting an information adoption pathway appropriate to each pattern, this study sought to enhance information adoption.
Keywords
Information Adoption; Information Perception; Information Assessment;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김두섭, 강남준, 2000, 회귀분석 기초와 응용, 나남출판사
2 송미령, 박주영, 김정섭, 2006, 농산촌 지역혁신체계 기반 구축, 한국농촌경제연구원
3 임형백, 유승주, 2006, 농촌지역의 지역혁신체계 구축을 위한 모형 연구: 특화산업과 지역 내 총생산의 연계성을 중심으로, 농촌계획, 12(3), 67-80
4 Kitchener, R F., 1999, The Conduct of Inquiry, Lanham, MD, University Press of America
5 Kline, S. J. and N. Rosenberg, 1986, An Overview of Innovation in Landau R and Rosenberg, N.(Eds.) The Positive Sum Strategy(275-295), Washing D.C., National Academic press
6 OECD, 1995a, Niche Market Development in Rural Areas: Workshops and Proceedings, Paris, OECD
7 Self, C. S., 1996, Credibility, In Salwan, M. and Stacks, D.(Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research, Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum
8 Venkatesh, A. and Davis, F. D., 2000, A Theoretical Extensiion of the Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, 46(2), 186-204   DOI   ScienceOn
9 신건권, 1998, 활동정보회계시스템의 구축에 관한 연구 : 유연성과 적용가능성을 중심으로, 정보시스템연구, 7(1), 55-76
10 Chaiken, S., 1979, Communicator Physical Attractiveness and Persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1387-1397   DOI
11 Hunt, J. M. and Smith, M. F., 1987, The Persuasive Impact of Two-Sided Selling Appeals for an Unknown Brand Name, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15(1), 11-17   DOI
12 김동주, 2005, 참여정부의 주요 국정과제 추진현황과 전망(1): 국가균형 발전의 비전과 전략, 국토 279: 6-17
13 Moulaert, F. and Sekia, F., 2002, Territorial Innovation Models: A critical Survey, Regional Studies, 37(3), 289-302   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Cialdini, R B., 1988, Influence: Science and Practice, New York, Harper Collins
15 Davis, F. D., 1989, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Tseng, S. and Fogg, B. 1., 1999, Credibility and computing technology, Communications of the ACM, 42, 39-44   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Wathan, C.N., and Burkell, 1., 2002, Believe it or not: Factors Influencing Credibility on the Web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 134-144   DOI   ScienceOn
18 농림부, 2005, 지역농업 및 지방농정 효과연구
19 Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T., 1984, Source Factors and the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion, In Kinnear, T. C.(Eds.), Advances III Consumer Research(668-672), Provo, Association for Consumer Research
20 Martinez-Brawley, E., 1995, Knowledge Diffusion and Transfer of Technology: Conceptual Rrenises and Concrete Steps for Human Services Innovations, Social Work, 40, 670-682
21 Lederer, A L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., and Zhaung, Y., 2000, The Technology Acceptance Model and the World Wide Web, Decision Support System, 29, 269-282   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Rogers, E. M., 2003, Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press
23 OECD, 1995b, Niche Markets as a Rural Development Strategy, Paris, OECD
24 이병옥, 2004, 전달과 정보해석학, 해석학연구, 13, 63-99
25 Bathrick, D. D., Byrnes, K. J., Stovall, J. G. and Podems, D. R, 1996, Technology Institutions for Agricultural Frdd Trade in the Americas(TIAFTA), U.S. Agency for Internaltioanl Development, LAC TECH Project, Washington, D. C.
26 Harrison-Walker, L. J., 2001, E-complaining: A content analysis of an Internet Complaint Forum, Journal of Services Marketing, 15(5), 397-412   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A., 1995, Understanding Information Technology Usage : A Test of Competing Models, Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Insko, C. A, 1967, Theories of attitude change, New York, Appleton-Century Crofts
29 임형백, 이성우, 2004, 농촌사회의 환경과 기능, 서울, 서울대학교 출판부
30 최상호, 이종만, 2008, 혁신전파 과정상의 정보내용 및 정보공유방식 차이 분석, 농촌지도와 개발, 15(2), 367-398
31 최상호, 최영찬. 2008, 지역특화작목시험장의 혁신전파 유형화와 커뮤니케이션 만족도 연구, 농업교육과 인적자원개발, 40(1), 57-82
32 안근식, 신건권, 1995, 회계측정론, 신영사
33 Asheim, B. T. and Isaksen, A, 1997, Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway?, European Planning Studies, 5(3), 299-330   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Kaimowitz, D., 1990, Making the Link: Agricultural Research and Technology Transfer in Developing Countries, London, Westview Press
35 Byerlee, D. and Alex, G. E., 1998, Strengthening National Agricultural Research Systems, The World Bank
36 King, J. L., Gurbaxini, K. L., Kreamer, F. W., McFarlan, K. S., Raman, K. S., and Yap, C. S., 1994, The Institutioanl Factors in Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research, 5(2), 139-169   DOI
37 김창호, 황의록, 1997, '구전정보의 특성과 구전효과의 관계', 광고연구, 여름호, 55-77
38 노형진, 2005, SPSS/AMOS에 의한 사회조사분석, 형설출판사
39 윤승옥, 2004, 모바일 인터넷의 수용결정요인에 대한 연구 : 정보기술수용모형을 중심으로, 한국언록학보, 48(3), 274-301
40 김정호, 박준기, 김영생, 이병훈, 2005, 지역농업클러스터 발전방안, 한국농촌경제연구원
41 조현철, 1999, 구조방정식모델, 석정
42 이순묵, 1990, 공변량구조분석, 성원사
43 Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R P. and Warshaw, P. P., 1989, User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Brown, J. J. and Reingen, P. H, 1987, Social Ties and Word of Mouth Referral Behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350-362   DOI   ScienceOn
45 Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., 1975, Belife, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley
46 최상호, 이성우, 최영찬, 2007. 순위형 로짓모형을 이용한 농업인의 혁신네트워크 연계 특성, 농촌계획, 13(4), 43-57   과학기술학회마을
47 Rogers, E. M. and Shoemaker, F. F., 1971, Communication of Innovation, New York: Free Press
48 김계수, 2006, AMOS 구조방정식 모형분석, 한나래