Browse > Article

Quantitative Approaches for Agricultural and Rural Policy Evaluation  

Lee, Seong-Woo (Program in Regional Information, Seoul National University)
Yun, Seong-Do (Program in Regional Information, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning / v.14, no.4, 2008 , pp. 97-108 More about this Journal
Abstract
The present study construct a new technique that can evaluate diverse rural policies, which have been applied to the rural development programs at the village level. The method incorporates spatial econometrics models with a decomposition method that has little been utilized before. We applies the technique to evaluate the rural development programs that have been carried out by the Korea Forest Service and. Korea Rural Development Agency. The technique proved to be quite useful in that the technique efficiently separate the direct effect caused by the government policy from the effect explained by the endowment effect such as regional or area characteristics, and residual effect that cannot be identified by the models. The present study concludes with suggesting more quantitative methods need to be developed to evaluate diverse government policy programs, which enables us to discern correct policy effects.
Keywords
Policy Evaluation; Decomposition Method; Factor Analysis; Econometrics Model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 문춘걸, 나성린, 2002, 요인분석에 의거한 국가별 정보화지수의 측정, 응용경제, 4(2), 89-114
2 Basilevsky, A., 1994, Statistical Factor Analysis and Related Methods, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, A Wiley-Interscience Publication
3 Blinder, A., S., 1973, Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimation, The Journal of Human Resources, 5(4), 436-455
4 Campbell, D. and J. Stanley, 1963, Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research, Rand McNally & Company
5 Madaus, G. F., M. Scriven and D. L. Stufflebeam, 1983, Evaluation Models: Viewpoint on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, Kluwer-Nijhoff
6 Robinson, W. S., 1950, Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals, Sociological Review, 15, 351-357   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Simon, H. A., 1954, Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49(267), 467-479   DOI
8 Smith, M. F., 1989, Evaluability Assessment: A Practical Approach, Kluwer
9 박경수, 1989, 농가부채의 실태와 해결방안, 국회보, 271, 9-15, 국회쟁무위원회
10 유병복, 1998, 정책학개론, 용보출판사
11 노화준, 2006, 정책평가론, 법문사
12 Oaxaca, R., 1973, Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets, International Economic Review, 14(3), 693-709   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Wholey, J. S., 1979, Evaluation: Promise and Performance, the Urban Institute
14 Alker, H. R. Jr., 1969, A Typology of Ecological Fallacies, in Dogan M. And S. Rokkan eds., Quantitative Ecological Aanalysis in the Social Science, MIT press
15 Ciarlo, J. A., 1981, Utilizing Evaluation: Concepts and Measurement Techniques, Sage Press
16 Gorsuch, R. L., 1983, Factor Analysis(2nd Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Association
17 이성우, 박지영, 민성희, 윤성도, 2005, 로짓.프라빗모형응용, 박영사
18 Campbell, D. and L. Ross, 1968, The Connecticut Crack-down on Speeding, Law and Society Review, 3(1), 31-53
19 Vedung, E., 1995, 이경옥 역,정책평가개론, 한울아카데미
20 이정전, 2005, 경제학에서 본 정치와 정부, 박영사
21 Kerlinger, F. N. and E. J. Pedhazur, 1973, Regression in Behavioral Research, Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc
22 Wachter, S. M. and I. F. Megbolugbe, 1992, Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Homeownership, Housing Policy Debate, 3(2), 333-379
23 Van Horn, E. and E. Carl, 1979, Policy Implementation in the Federal System, D.C. Health
24 Ault, R. W., R. B. Ekeland Jr., J. D. Jacson, R. S. Baba and D. S. Saurman, 1991, Somking and Absenteeism, Applied Economics, 23, 743-754   DOI
25 김명수, 2003, 공공정책평가론, 박영사
26 Coleman, J. S., 1979, Equality of Educational Opportunity, Arno Press
27 Fisk, D., 1970, The Indianapols Fleet PlanL: an Example of Program Evaluation for Local Government, the Urban Institute
28 LeSage, J. P., 1998, Spatial Econometrics, Web Book, http://www.econ.utoledo.edu/
29 House, E. R., 1980, Evaluationg with Validity, Sage Press
30 Goodman, L. A., 1970, The Multivariate Analysis of Qualitative Data: Ineraction among Multiple Classifications, Journal of the American Statistical Associations, 65, 226-256   DOI
31 Mardia, K. V., J. T. Kent and J. M. Bibby, 2000, Multivariate Analysis, Academic Press
32 Anderson, J. E., 1984, Public Policy-Making, 3rd ed., Rinehart and Winston
33 Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln, 1981, Effective Evaluation: Improving the Uselulness of Evaluation results through Responsive and Naturalisitic Approaches, Jossey-Bass
34 Blinder, A. S., 1976, On Dogmatism in Human Capital Theory, The Journal of Human Resources, 11(1), 8-22   DOI
35 Deninston, O. L., I. Rosenstock and V. Getting, 1968, Evaluation of Program Effectiveness, Public Health Reports, 83(4), 333-334
36 Hatry, H., L. Blair, D. Fisk and W. Kimmel, 1976, Program Analysis for State and Local Government, the Urban Institute