Browse > Article

Interconnected Characteristics of Innovation Networks of Farmers Employing Ranked Logit Model  

Choi, Sang-Ho (Institute for Regional Planning and Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University)
Lee, Seong-Woo (Seoul National University)
Choe, Young-Chan (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning / v.13, no.4, 2007 , pp. 53-67 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study analyzed the probability that experiment stations, agricultural technology and extension centers, provincial agricultural research and extension services, central government organs, or civilian and other related organs will be the first choice of the compositional subjects of local innovation networks. While gender effect was statistically insignificant, educational level, income, main acquired information, sources of necessary information, and frequency of information acquisition sessions were significant, and the preference ranking model was highly relevant. According to the analysis, highly academic and business-related information was most likely to be acquired from the civilian sector; agricultural technology such as technology, crops/plants, storage, and circulation was most likely to be acquired from experiment stations and provincial agricultural research and extension services; and information on agricultural production was most likely to be acquired from agricultural technology centers.
Keywords
Innovation Network; Experiment Stations; Local agriculture;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김동주. (2005) 참여정부의 주요 국정과제 추진현황과 전망(1): 국가균형발전의 비전과 전략, 국토 279: 6-17
2 류승호. (1996). CMC와 정보서비스와의 상관관계에 대한 정책적 접근, 한국정책학회보 5(2): 161-180
3 이춘우, 유홍섭, 김성국, 유용환, 박종욱. (2006). 농업정보 전달매체 및 농업언 선호정보 조사, 한국국제농업개발학회지 18: 40-42
4 Allen, B. L. (1994). Cognitive abilities and information system usability, Information Processing and Management 30(2): 177-191   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Antonelli, C. (2000). ColIective knowledge communication and innovation: The evidence of technological districts, Regional Studies 34(6): 535-548   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Asheim, B. & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional Innovation Systems: the integration of local 'sticky' and global 'ubiquitous' knowledge, Journal of Technology Transfer 27: 77-86   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Doloreux, D. (2002). What We should Konw about Regional Systems of Innovation, Technology in Society 24: 243-263   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Hauknes, J. (2001). Innovation styles in agro-food production in Norway. In OECD, Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems
9 Kaimowitz, D. (1990). Making the Link: Agricultural Research and Technology Transfer in Developing Countries, London: Westview Press
10 Kline, S. J. & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An Overview of Innovation. In Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. & Soete, L.(Eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy, Washington: National Academy Press
11 McFadden, D. (1980). Econometric Models for Probabilistic Choice among Products, Journal of Business 53(3): 513-529
12 Norman, D. A. & Draper, S. W. (1986). User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
13 Savolainen, R. (1993). The sense-making theory: reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use, Information Processing & Management 29(1): 13-28   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Stein, J. A. (1981). Irradiation-related thyroid cancer: influencing the health behaviour of high risk individual through mass media and a telephone Information service, Paper presented to the American Association for Cancer Education, San Diego
15 Todtling, F. & Kaufmann, A. (1999). Innovation Systems in Regions of Europe: A Comparative Perspective. European Planning Studies 7(6): 699-717   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Wilson, T. D. (1984). The cognitive approach to information-seeking behaviour and information use, Social Science Information Studies 4: 197-204   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Wilson, T. D. (1997). Information behaviour: An Interdisciplinary perspective, Information Processing & Management 33(4): 551-572   DOI   ScienceOn
18 DeBresson, C. & Amesse, F. (1991). Networks of innovators: A review and introduction to the issue, Research Policy 20(5): 363-379   DOI   ScienceOn
19 민동규, 김혜정. (2004). 관광정보 웹사이트 서비스 요인분석에 관한 연구: 지방자치단체 관광정보 웹사이트를 중심으로, 관광정보연구 17: 113-143
20 Belkin, N. J., Oddy, R. N. & Brooks, H. M. (1982). ASK for information retrieval: Part 1, Background and theory, Journal of Documentation 38: 61-71   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Latta, G. F. & Swigger, K. (1992). Validation of the repertory grid for use in modeling knowledge, Journal of the American Society for information Science 43(2): 115-129   DOI
22 McFadden, D. (1976). Quantal Choice Analysis : A Survey, Annals of Economics and Social Measurement 5: 363-390
23 Salomon, M. L. & Engel, P. G. H. (1997). Networking for Innovation, Royal Tropical Institute-Amsterdam
24 Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, New York: Free Press
25 최병익, 위오기, 이규대. (1995). 충청남도의 농업정보사스템의 구축에 관한 연구, 한국국제지역사회개발학회 5: 7-35
26 Guthrie, J. T., Weber, S. & Kimmerly, N. (1993). Searching document: Cognitive processes and deficits in understanding graphs, tables, and illustrations, Contemporary Educatiional Psychology 18(2): 186-221   DOI   ScienceOn
27 이경진. (2005). 농촌지역자원에 기반한 산업의 생산 및 혁신 네트워크에 관한 연구, 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
28 Allison, P. D. (1999). Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficient across Groups, Sociological Methods & Research 28(2) : 186-208   DOI
29 Barry, C. L. (1994). User defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study, Journal of the American Society for Information System 45(3): 149-159   DOI   ScienceOn
30 McKelvey, M. (1997). Using Evolutionary Theory to Define Systems of Innovation, In Edquist, C.(Eds.), Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter
31 Tenopir, C., Nahl-Jakobovits, D. & Howard, D. L. (1991). Strategies and assessments ments online: Novices' experience, Library and Information Science Research 13(3): 237-266
32 Basch, R. (1993). Secrets of the super searchers: Planning search strategies, Online 17(5): 52-54
33 Dosi, G. (1988). The nature of the innovative process. In Dosi, G.(Eds.), Technical Change & Economic Theory, London: Pinter
34 OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Paris: OECD
35 Allen, B. L. (1996). Information Tasks: Toward a User-centered Approach to Information System, San Diego: Academic Press
36 Watters, C. & Shepherd, M. A. (1994). Shifting the information paradigm from data-centered to user-centered, Information Processing & Management 30(4): 455-471   DOI   ScienceOn
37 농림부. (2002). 농업정보 응용기반 구축에 관한 연구
38 Pezzini, M. (2002). Cultivating Regional Development: Main Trends and Policy Challenges in OECD Regions, In An International conference on Regional Development and Foreign Direct Investment in Fortaleza, Brazil
39 Wersig, G. & Windel, G. (1985). Information sciences needs a theory of 'information actions', Social Science Information Studies 5: 11-23   DOI   ScienceOn
40 김인중, 김영수, 김선배. (2001). 지식기반경제에서의 지역혁신체계 구축모형, 산업연구원
41 김용웅 등. (2003). 지역발전론, 서울: 한울아카데미
42 Drehen, M. J. & Guthrie, J. T. (1990). Cognitive processes in textbook chapter search tasks, Reading Research Quarterly 25(4): 323-339   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach, NY: Oxford
44 Edquist, C. (1997). Introduction: Systems of Innovation Approaches-Their Emergence and Characteristics, In Edquist, C.(Eds.), Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter
45 강현수. (2006). 지역혁신체제 구축에 있어서 국책 연구기관의 역할에 관한 연구, 한국지역지리학회지 12(1): 108-123
46 Fidel, R. (1997). User-centered approach to the design of information systems: Change as Challenging Opportunity, In An International Seminar and Lectures on the User-centered Information Systems, Seoul: KIST
47 Belkin, N. J. (1984). Cognitive models and information transfer, Social Science Information Studies 4: 111-129   DOI   ScienceOn
48 Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks: a new paradigm of rural development?, Journal of Rural Studies 16: 407-419   DOI   ScienceOn
49 김경미, 고운미. (2005). 여성농업인의 역할유형별 영농의사결정 참여실태, 농업교육과 인적자원개발 37(3): 47-64
50 Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal 17: 109-122   DOI   ScienceOn
51 Marchionini, G. (1992). Interfaces for end-user information seeking, Journal of the Amercan Society for Information Science 43(2): 156-163   DOI
52 Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer mediated interaction: A relational perspective, Communication Research 19(1): 52-90   DOI
53 Allison, P. D., & Christakis, N. A. (1994). Logit Models for Sets of Ranked Items, Sociological Methodology 24 : 199-228   DOI   ScienceOn
54 임업. (2005). 지식외부효과의 공간적 특성과 지속가능한 지역혁신체제의 구축, 국토 284: 100-108
55 Asheim, B. & Isaksen, A. (1997). Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway?, European Planning Studies 5(3): 299-231   DOI   ScienceOn
56 Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National System of Innovation: Toward? a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter
57 오익근, 최재화. (1999). 광역자치단체의 홈페이지 관광정보 구성체계, 한국관광학회 제45차 학술연구발표회 주제발표 논문집
58 McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, In Zarembka, P.(Eds.), Frontiers in Economics, Academic Press
59 Bellardo, T. (1985). An investigatin of online searcher traits and their relationship to serach outcome, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 36(4): 241-250   DOI
60 Moulaert, F. & Sekia, F. (2002). Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey, Regional Studies 37(3): 289-302   DOI   ScienceOn