Browse > Article

Improvement Plan of Environment-Impacting Facilities by Inhabitants Consciousness and Spatial Characteristics in Rural Areas  

Kim, Young-Joo (Dept. of Biosystem and Agricultural Engineering institute Agricultural Science & Technology, Chonnam National Univ.)
Choi, Soo-Myung (Dept. of Biosystem and Agricultural Engineering institute Agricultural Science & Technology, Chonnam National Univ.)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning / v.11, no.4, 2005 , pp. 99-108 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, thirteen villages in Chonnam province were selected as case study sites and the spatial distribution of the facilities in the villages was examined to provide basic information fur the establishment of rural plans. According to the questionnaire survey, various problem such as environmental pollution, position, scene, management etc. was brought owing to cattle shed, and dissension was more or less seen by scale of facilities, management of facilities and waste, regional factor(stock farming management condition, life style and attitude of inhabitants) and topographical factor (height, position physical aspect of a mountain, distance with water resources etc.) etc.. The facilities could be classified into 6 types based on the their spatial locations: 1) Type 1, facilities located at the waterside; 2) Type 2, facilities located at the entrance of village; 3) Type 3 facilities, scattered in the residential area: 4) Type 4 facilities, collectivized in village; 5) Type 5 facilities, adjoining village; and 6) Type 6 facilities, scattered irregularly inside and outside of village. Based on the classification, possible implementations for the reduction of environmental impacts were suggested. The results of this study could be used as an example of study on the distribution, classification, and rearrangement of environment-impacting facilities in rural areas for improvement of their roles in providing amenity resources.
Keywords
Environment-impacting facilities; Rural amenity; Rural improvement;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김정식, 황한철, 2002, 농촌마을 정비를 위한 어메니티 평가지표 설정, 한국농촌계획학회 춘계 학술논문 발표자료집, 24-21
2 임형백, 2001, 어메니티의 개념, 기원과 역사, 분류에 관한 연구, 한국농촌지도학회지 8(2) : 191-199   과학기술학회마을
3 김상범 외 5인, 2004, 자료정규화를 통한 농촌어메니티자원 조사표의 표준화, 농촌계획 10(4) : 1-7   과학기술학회마을
4 농촌진흥청 농촌자원개발연구소, 2005, 농촌 어메니티 자원 조사지침서
5 Wilkinson, R. K., 1973, House Price and the Measurement of Externalities, Economic Journal 83 : 72-86   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Dejong, G. F., 1977, Residential Preferences and Migration, Demography 14(2) : 169-178   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
7 Kruntilla, J. V., 1967, Conservation Reconsidered, American Economic Review 57(4) : 777-786
8 김정식, 황한철, 최수명, 2002, 농촌마을정체성 확립을 위한 어메니티 평가목표체계 구축, 한국농공학회 추계학술논문발표자료집, 101-104   과학기술학회마을
9 최원선, 조용성, 2001, 혐오시설 입지에 대한 지역주민의 의사결정 요인 분석, 농업경영.정책연구 2(4) : 742-756