Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9717/kmms.2020.23.5.667

Battlefield Ontology for Communication Unit Mission  

Lee, Yujin (Defense Security Support Command)
Lee, Kyong-Ho (Department of Computer Science, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Multimedia Society / v.23, no.5, 2020 , pp. 667-672 More about this Journal
Abstract
Defense M&S (Modeling&Simulation) is a tool that creates a virtual battle situation similar to the real world, measuring and evaluating the effects of war or combat elements. However, it is very challenging to consider all the possible outcomes on the battlefield. To solve this problem, we propose a battlefield ontology, which conceptualizes the data of battlefield situation with tactical considerations. The proposed battlefield ontology is evaluated based on various communication posts in war game scenarios. The battlefield ontology is expected to assist the process of quick and accurate command decisions in convoluted battlefield situations.
Keywords
Defense Modeling&Simulation(M&S); Battlefield Ontology; Conceptual Model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 F. Mariano, G.P. Asuncion, J. Natalia, "Methontology: From Ontological Art Towards Ontological Engineering," Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium Stanford, pp. 33-40, 1997.
2 Technical Report Project; On - To - Knowledge Methodology-Final Version, EU IST-1999-10132, 2002.
3 Technical Report; Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, KSL0105, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory, SMI-2001-0880, 2001.
4 W.H. Jang, “A Study on Ontology Modeling for Weapon Parts Development Information,” Journal of Korea Multimedia Society, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 873-885, 2015.   DOI
5 K.S. Kim, “Synthetic Battlefield Training System Technology Trend and Development Direction,” Journal of The Korean Institute of Communication and Information Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 11, pp. 27-35, 2017.
6 B. Smith, M. Kristo, M. William, "The Ontology of Command and Control," Proceedings of the 14th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, pp. 1334-1337, 2009.
7 S. Wartik, "A JC3IEDM OWL-DL Ontology," Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on OWL: Experiences and Directions, pp. 248-251, 2009.
8 W. Wang, F. Yang, W. Ma, X. Li, Y. Wu, "A Domain Ontology for Ballistic Missile Defense Conceptual Model," Proceedings of the 48th Annual Simulation Symposium, pp. 181-187, 2015.
9 S. Kars, H. Qguztuzun, "An Ontology for Naval Wargame Conceptual Model," Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 1-11, 2011.
10 C. Maathuis, W. Pieters, J. Berg, "A Computational Ontology for Cyber Operations," Proceedings of European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, Academic Conferences and Publishing, pp. 278-288, 2018.
11 F. John, "Distributed Mission Operations and Distributed Mission Training : A USAF Construct for the Live, Virtual, and Constructive Environment," Military Technology, pp. 24-29, 2004.
12 S.W. Shin, J.Y. Lee, S.M. Bae, C.M. Kim, “A Study on Simulation of Future Ground System Effectiveness Analysis Model with Communication Effects,” Journal of Applied Reliability, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 168-180, 2017.
13 T.R. Gruber, “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications,” Knowledge Acquisition, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 199-220, 1993.   DOI