Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9717/kmms.2017.20.10.1637

Active Sonar Target/Nontarget Classification Using Real Sea-trial Data  

Seok, J.W. (Dept. of Information & Communication, Changwon National University)
Publication Information
Abstract
Target/Nontarget classification can be divided into the study of shape estimation of the target analysing reflected echo signal and of type classification of the target using acoustical features. In active sonar system, the feature vectors are extracted from the signal reflected from the target, and an classification algorithm is applied to determine whether the received signal is a target or not. However, received sonar signals can be distorted in the underwater environments, and the spatio-temporal characteristics of active sonar signals change according to the aspect of the target. In addition, it is very difficult to collect real sea-trial data for research. In this paper, target/non-target classification were performed using real sea-trial data. Feature vectors are extracted using MFCC(Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients), filterbank energy in the Fourier spectrum and wavelet domain. For the performance verification, classification experiments were performed using backpropagation neural network classifiers.
Keywords
Active Sonar; Target; Non-target; Classification; Sea-trial Data;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 J. Seok, “Multi-aspect Based Active Sonar Target Classification,” Journal of Korea Multimedia Society, Vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 1775- 1781, 2016.   DOI
2 Y. Shao, S. Srinivasan, Z. Jin, and D. Wang, “A Computational Auditory Scene Analysis System for Robust Speech Recognition,” Computer Speech and Language, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 77-93, 2010.   DOI
3 D.h. Li, M.R. Azimi Sadjadi, M. Robinson, “Comparision of Different Classification Algorithms for Underwater Target Discrimination,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 189-194, 2004.   DOI
4 V.W. Young and P.C. Hines, “Perception-based Automatic Classification of Impulsive Source Active Sonar Echoes,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 122, No. 3, pp. 1502-1517, 2007.   DOI
5 S.M. Murphy and P.C. Hines, "Examining the Robustness of Automated Aural Classification of Active Sonar Echoes," J ournal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 135, No. 2, pp. 626-636, 2014.   DOI
6 C.M. Binder and P.C. Hines, "Automated Aural Classification Used for Inter-species Discrimination of Cetaceans," J ournal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 135, No. 4, pp. 2113-2125, 2014.   DOI
7 R.P. Gorman and T.J. Sejnowski, "Analysis of Hidden Units in a Layered Network Trained to Classify Sonar Targets," Neural Networks, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 75-89, 1998.   DOI
8 P. Flandrin, F. Magand, and M. Zakharia, “Generalized Target Description and Wavelet Decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 350-352, 1990.   DOI
9 M.R. Azimi-Sadjadi, D. Yao, Q. Huang, G.J. Dobeck, “Underwater Target Classification Using Wavelet Packets and Neural Networks,” IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 784-794, 2000.   DOI
10 J.B. Jung, G.F. Denny, J.W. Tilley, A. Kulinchenko, and P.K. Simpson, "BroadBand Active Sonar Swimmer Detection and Identification," Proceeding of IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 2600-2605, 2006.