Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.48022/mbl.2210.10012

Evaluation of Biohydrogen Production Using Various Inoculum Sources  

Geumhee, Kim (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University)
Jiho, Lee (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University)
Hyoju, Yang (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University)
Yun-Yeong, Lee (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University)
Yoonyong, Yang (Biological and Genetic Resources Assessment Division, National Institute of Biological Resources)
Sungho, Choi (Biological and Genetic Resources Assessment Division, National Institute of Biological Resources)
Moonsuk, Hur (Biological and Genetic Resources Assessment Division, National Institute of Biological Resources)
Byounghee, Lee (Biological and Genetic Resources Assessment Division, National Institute of Biological Resources)
Kyung-Suk, Cho (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters / v.50, no.4, 2022 , pp. 557-562 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study we evaluated biohydrogen production potential as operational parameters (substrate, salt concentration, and temperature) using eight inoculum sources. While the volumetric biohydrogen production rate was significantly affected by temperature and inoculum sources, substrate and salt concentration did not have a significant effect on the biohydrogen production. Mesophilic temperature (37℃) was also found more appropriate for the hydrogen production than thermophilic temperature (50℃). Rate, while the eight inoculum sources, anaerobic digestion sludge exhibited the fastest biohydrogen production. The maximum production rate from anaerobic digestion sludge was 2,729 and 1,385 ml-H2·l-1·d-1 at mesophilic and thermophilic temperature, respectively.
Keywords
Biohydrogen; inoculum source; soil; sediment; anaerobic sludge; temperature;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Saravanan A, Senthil Kumar P, Khoo SK, Show PL, Femina Carolin C, Fetcia Jackulin C, et al. 2021. Biohydrogen from organic wastes as a clean and environment friendly energy source: Production pathways, feedstock types, and future prospects. Bioresour. Technol. 342: 126021. 
2 Cheng D, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Deng L, et al. 2022. Advanced strategies for enhancing dark fermentative biohydrogen production from biowaste towards sustainable environment. Bioresour. Technol. 351: 127045. 
3 Preethi, Usman TMM, Banu JR, Gunasekaran M, Kumar G. 2019. Biohydrogen production from industrial wastewater: An overview. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 7: 100287. 
4 Banu JR, Usman TMM, Kavitha S, Kannah RY, Yogalakshmi KN, Sivashanmugam P, et al. 2021. Critical review on limitation and enhancement strategies associated with biohydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46: 16565-16590.    DOI
5 Kim H, Im S, Mostafa A, Prakash O, Kim DH. 2021. Analysis of biohydrogen production potential from organic wastes generated in Korea. J. Korean Soc. Environ. Eng. 43: 591-600.    DOI
6 Dawood F, Anda M, Shafiullah GM. 2020. Hydrogen production for energy: An overview. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45: 3847-3869.    DOI
7 Liu D, Sun Y, Li Y, Lu Y. 2017. Perturbation of formate pathway and NADH pathway acting on the biohydrogen production. Sci. Rep. 7: 9587. 
8 Srivastava N, Srivastava M, Abd-Allah EF, Hashem A, Gupta VK. 2021. Biohydrogen production using kitchen waste as the potential substrate: A sustainable approach. Chemosphere 271: 129537. 
9 Wang H, Xu J, Sheng L, Liu X, Lu Y, Li W. 2018. A review on biohydrogen production technology. Int. J. Energy Res. 42: 3442-3453.    DOI
10 Wong YM, Wu TY, Juan JC. 2014. A review of sustainable hydrogen production using seed sludge via dark fermentation. Renewable. Sustain. Energy Rev. 34: 471-482.    DOI
11 Yin Y, Hu J, Wang J. 2014. Gamma irradiation as a pretreatment method for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from digested sludge. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39: 13543-13549.    DOI
12 National Institute of Environmental Research. 2012. Study on integrated management of organic waste. Available from https: //doi.org/10.23000/TRKO201700008276. Accessed Oct. 18, 2022.    DOI
13 Cakr A, Ozmihci S, Kargi F. 2010. Comparison of bio-hydrogen production from hydrolyzed wheat starch by mesophilic and thermophilic dark fermentation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35: 13214-13218.    DOI
14 Wongthanate J, Chinnacotpong K, Khumpong M. 2014. Impacts of pH, temperature, and pretreatment method on biohydrogen production from organic wastes by sewage microflora. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 5: 1-6.    DOI
15 Luo Y, Zhang H, Salerno M, Logan BE, Bruns MA. 2008. Organic loading rates affect composition of soil-derived bacterial communities during continuous, fermentative biohydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 33: 6566-6576.    DOI
16 Iyer P, Bruns MA, Zhang H, van Ginkel S, Logan BE. 2004. H2-producing bacterial communities from a heat-treated soil inoculum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66: 166-173.    DOI
17 Lee KS, Lin PJ, Chang JS. 2006. Temperature effects on biohydrogen production in a granular sludge bed induced by activated carbon carriers. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 31: 465-472.    DOI
18 Mu Y, Zheng, XJ, Yu HQ, Zhu RF. 2006. Biological hydrogen production by anaerobic sludge at various temperatures. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 31: 780-785.    DOI
19 Shi XY, Jin DW, Sun QY, Li WW. 2010. Optimization of conditions for hydrogen production from brewery wastewater by anaerobic sludge using desirability function approach. Renew. Energy 35: 1493-1498.    DOI
20 Wang J, Wan W. 2008. Effect of temperature on fermentative hydrogen production by mixed cultures. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 33: 5392-5397.    DOI
21 Wang J, Wan W. 2011. Combined effects of temperature and pH on biohydrogen production by anaerobic digested sludge. Biomass Bioenerg. 35: 3896-3901.   DOI