Browse > Article

Electricity Production Performance of Single- and Dual-cathode Microbial Fuel Cells Coupled to Carbon Source and Nitrate  

Jang, Jae-Kyung (Energy and Environmental Division,, National academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
Lee, Eun-Young (Dept. of Environmental Energy Engineering, The University of Suwon)
Ryou, Young-Sun (Energy and Environmental Division,, National academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
Lee, Sung-Hyoun (Energy and Environmental Division,, National academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
Hwang, Ji-Hwan (Energy and Environmental Division,, National academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
Lee, Hyung-Mo (Energy and Environmental Division,, National academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Jong-Goo (Energy and Environmental Division,, National academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
Kang, Youn-Koo (Energy and Environmental Division,, National academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Young-Hwa (Energy and Environmental Division,, National academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
Publication Information
Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters / v.39, no.4, 2011 , pp. 382-386 More about this Journal
Abstract
Microbial fuel cells (MFC), devices that use bacteria as a catalyst to generate electricity, can utilize a variety of organic wastes as electron donors. The current generated may differ depending on the organic matter concentrations used, when other conditions, such as oxidant supply, proton transfer, internal resistance and so on, are not limiting factors. In these studies, a single-cathode type MFC (SCMFC) and dual-cathode type MFC (DCMFC) were used to ascertain the current's improvement through an increase in the contact area between the anode and the cathode compartments, because the cathode reaction is one of the most serious limiting factors in an MFC. Also an MFC was conducted to explore whether an improvement in electricity generation resulted from oxidizing the carbon sources and nitrates. About 250 mg $L^{-1}$ sodium acetate was fed to an anode compartment with a flow rate of 0.326 mL $min^{-1}$ by continuous mode. The current generated from the DCMFC was higher than the value produced from MFC with a single cathode. COD removal of dual-cathode MFC was also higher than that of single-cathode MFC. The nitrate didn't affect current generation at 2 mM, but when 4 and 8 mM nitrate was supplied, the current in the single-cathode and dual-cathode MFC was decreased by 98% from $5.97{\pm}0.13$ to $0.23{\pm}0.03$ mA and $8.40{\pm}0.23$ to $0.20{\pm}0.01$ mA, respectively. These results demonstrate that increasing of contact area of the anode and cathode can raise current generation by an improvement in the cathode reaction.
Keywords
Microbial fuel cell; electricity; nitrate; dual-cathode; single-cathode;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 1
연도 인용수 순위
1 Li, J., Q. Fu, X. Zhu, Q. Liao, L. Zhang, and H. Wang. 2010. A solar regenrable cathodic electron acceptor for microbial fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta. 55: 2332-2337.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Logan, B. E., B. Hamelers, R. Rozendal, U. Schroder, J. Keller, S. Freguia, P. Aelterman, and K. Rabaey. 2006. Microbial fuel cells: Methodology and technology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40: 5181-5192.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Morris, J. M., S.Jin. 2009. Influence of $NO_{3}$ and $SO_{4}$ on power generation from microbial fuel cells. Chemical Engineering Journal. 153: 127-130.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Pham, T. H., J. K. Jang, I. S. Chang, and B. H. Kim. 2004. Improvement of cathode reaction of a mediatorless microbial fuel cell. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14: 324-329.
5 You, S., Q. Zhao, J. Zhang, J. Jiang, and S. Zhao. 2006. A microbial fuel cell using permanganate as the cathodic electron acceptor. Jouranl of Power Source. 162: 1409-1415.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Zhao, F., F. Harnisch, U. Schroder, F. Scholz, P. Bogdanoff, and I. Herrmann. 2005. Application of pyrolysed iron (II) phthalocyanine and CoTMPP based oxygen reduction catalysts as cathode materials in microbial fuel cells. Electrochemistry Communications. 7: 1405-1410.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Chang, I. S., H. Moon, J. K. Jang, and B. H. Kim. 2005.Improvement of a microbial fuel cell performance as a BOD sensor using respiratory inhibitors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 20: 1856-1859.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Gil, G. C., I. S. Chang, B. H. Kim, M. Kim, J. K. Jang, H. S. Park, and H. J. Kim. 2003. Operational parameters affecting the performance of a mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Biosens. Bioelectron. 18: 327-324.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Jang, J. K., T. H. Pham, I. S. Chang, K. H. Kang, H. Moon, K. S. Cho, and B. H. Kim. 2004. Construction and operation of a novel mediator- and membrane-less microbial fuel cell. Process Biochem. 39: 1007-1012.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Jang, J. K., I. S. Chang, H. W. Hwang, Y. F. Choo, J. Lee, K. S. Cho, B. H. Kim, and K. H. Nealson. 2010. Electricity generation coupled to oxidation of propionate in a microbial fuel cell. Biotechnology letters. 32: 79-85.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Larminie, J and A. Dicks. 2000. Fuel cell systems explained. pp. 66-68. 1st Ed. John wiley and Sons, West Sussex, England.
12 Jang, J. K., J. E. Choi, Y. S. Ryou, S. H. Lee, E. and Y. Lee. 2012. Effect of ammonium and nitrate on the current generation using dual-cathode microbial fuel cells. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Doi: 10.4014/jmb.1110.10040
13 Kim, B. H., H. J. Kim, M. S. Hyun, and D. H. Park. 1999(B). Direct electrode reaction of Fe (III) reducing bacterium, Shewanella putrefacience. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 9: 127- 131.
14 Kim, B. H., T. Ikeda, H. S. Park, H. J. Kim, M. S. Hyun, K. Kano, K. Takagi, and H. Tatsumi. 1999(A). Electrochemical activity of a Fe (III)-reducing bacterium, Shewanella putrefaci- ens IR-1, in the presence of alternative electron acceptors. Biotechnol. Tech. 13: 475-478.   DOI