Browse > Article

Deriving geological contact geometry from potential field data  

Ugalde, Hernan (MAGGIC, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University)
Morris, William A. (MAGGIC, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University)
Publication Information
Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration / v.13, no.1, 2010 , pp. 40-50 More about this Journal
Abstract
The building process of any geological map involves linking sparse lithological outcrop information with equally sparse geometrical measurements, all in a single entity which is the preferred interpretation of the field geologist. The actual veracity of this interpretative map is partially dependent upon the frequency and distribution of geological outcrops compounded by the complexity of the local geology. Geophysics is commonly used as a tool to augment the distribution of data points, however it normally does not have sufficient geometrical constraints due to: a) all geophysical inversion models being inherently non-unique; and b) the lack of knowledge of the physical property contrasts associated with specific lithologies. This contribution proposes the combined use of geophysical edge detection routines and 'three point' solutions from topographic data as a possible approach to obtaining geological contact geometry information (strike and dip), which can be used in the construction of a preliminary geological model. This derived geological information should first be assessed for its compatibility with the scale of the problem, and any directly observed geological data. Once verified it can be used to help constrain the preferred geological map interpretation being developed by the field geologist. The method models the contacts as planar surfaces. Therefore, it must be ensured that this assumption fits the scale and geometry of the problem. Two examples are shown from folded sequences at the Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick, Canada.
Keywords
Bathurst Mining Camp; potential fields; 3D modelling; topography;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Williams, N., 2008, Geologically-Constrained UBC-GIF Gravity and Magnetic Inversions with Examples from the Agnew-Wiluna Greenstone Belt, Western Australia: University of British Columbia.
2 Galley, A. G., Hannington, M. D., and Jonasson, I. R., 2007, Volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits. In W. D. Goodfellow (ed.). Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit-Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces and Exploration Methods: Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, 141–161.
3 Li, Y., and Oldenburg, D. W., 1996, 3-D Inversion of magnetic data: Geophysics, 61, 394–408. doi:10.1190/1.1443968
4 Hornby, P., Boschetti, F., and Horowitz, F. G., 1999, Analysis of potential field data in the wavelet domain: Geophysical Journal International, 137, 175–196. doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00788.x
5 van Staal, C. R., Wilson, R. A., Rogers, N. A., Fyffe, L., Langton, J. P., McCutcheon, S. R., McNicoll, V., and Ravenurst, C. E., 2003, Geology and tectonic history of the bathurst supergroup, Bathurst mining camp, and its relationships to coeval rocks in southwestern New Brunswick and adjacent maine – a synthesis: Economic Geology Monographs, 11, 37–60.
6 Barbosa, V. C. F., and Silva, J. B. C., 2006, Interactive 2Dmagnetic inversion: A tool for aiding forward modeling and testing geological hypotheses: Geophysics, 71, L43–L50. doi:10.1190/1.2258093
7 Calcagno, P., Courrioux, G., Guillen, A., Fitzgerald, D. J., and McInerney, P., 2006, How 3D implicit geometric modelling helps to understand geology: The 3D-geomodeller methodology: XIth International Congress, Society for Mathematical Geology.
8 Silverman, B., 1986, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis: Chapman & Hall.
9 Paterson, N. R., and Reeves, C. V., 1985, Applications of gravity and magnetic surveys: The state-of-the-art in 1985: Geophysics, 50, 2558–2594. doi:10.1190/1.1441884
10 Pilkington, M., and Keating, P., 2004, Contact mapping from gridded magnetic data-A comparison: ASEG, 17th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition.
11 Holden, E.-J., Dentith, M., and Kovesi, P., 2008, Towards the automated analysis of regional aeromagnetic data to identify regions prospective for gold deposits: Computers & Geosciences, 34, 1505–1513. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2007.08.007
12 Musgrave, R. J., Grewar, J., and Vega, M., 2006, Significance of remanence in stawell goldfield aeromagnetic anomalies: Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 53, 783–797. doi:10.1080/08120090600827454
13 Keating, P., Thomas, M., and Kiss, F., 2003, Significance of a highresolution magnetic and electromagnetic survey for exploration and geologic investigations. Bathurst mining camp: Economic Geology Monographs, 11, 783–798.
14 Geological Survey of Canada, 1996, Release of Airborne Geophysical Survey Data: Bathurst, New Brunswick. Open File 1394, 1394.