Browse > Article

Case studies of shallow marine investigations in Australia with advanced underwater seismic refraction (USR)  

Whiteley, Robert J. (Coffey Geotechnics Pty Ltd.)
Stewart, Simon B. (Coffey Geotechnics Pty Ltd.)
Publication Information
Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration / v.11, no.1, 2008 , pp. 34-40 More about this Journal
Abstract
Underwater seismic refraction with advanced interpretation approaches makes important contributions to shallow marine exploration and geotechnical investigations in Australia's coastal areas. A series of case studies are presented to demonstrate the recent applications of continuous and static USR methods to river crossing and port infrastructure projects at various sites around Australia. In Sydney, static underwater seismic refraction (USR) with bottom-placed receivers and borehole seismic imaging assisted the development of improved geotechnical models that reduced construction risk for a tunnel crossing of the Lane Cove River. In Melbourne, combining conventional boomer reflection and continuous USR with near-bottom sources and receivers improved the definition of a buried, variably weathered basalt flow and assisted dredging assessment for navigation channel upgrades at Geelong Ports. Sand quality assessment with continuous USR and widely spaced borehole information assisted commercial decisions on available sand resources for the reclamation phase of development at the Port of Brisbane. Buried reefs and indurated layers occur in Australian coastal sediments with the characteristics of laterally limited, high velocity, cap layers within lower velocity materials. If these features are not recognised then significant error in depth determination to deeper refractors can occur. Application of advanced refraction inversion using wavefront eikonal tomography to continuous USR data obtained along the route of a proposed offshore pipeline near Fremantle allowed these layers and the underlying bedrock refractor to be accurately imaged. Static USR and the same interpretation approach was used to image the drowned granitic regolith beneath sediments and indurated layers in the northern area of Western Australia at a proposed new berthing site where deep piling was required. This allowed preferred piling sites to be identified, reducing overall pile lengths. USR can be expected to find increased application to shallow marine exploration and geotechnical investigations in Australia's coastal areas as economic growth continues and improved interpretation methods are developed.
Keywords
seismic; refraction; underwater; ports; harbours; rivers; case studies;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ferguson, H. F., and Hamel, J. V., 1981, Valley stress relief in flat-lying sedimentary rocks, in Proceeding International Symposium on Weak Rocks, 1235-1240
2 Johnson D., 2005, Geology of Australia, Cambridge University Press, 288 p
3 Schuster, G. T., and Quintus-Bosz, A., 1993, Wavepath eikonal traveltime inversion: Geophysics 58, 1314-1323. doi: 10.1190/1.1443514   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Whiteley, R. J., 1994, Seismic refraction testing-a tutorial, in Geophysical Characterization of Sites. R. C. Woods, ed., ISSMFE, Tech. Com. 10, New Delhi, India, 45-47
5 Whiteley, R. J., 2006, Application of geophysics to underground space development, Proceeding 10th IAEG Congress, Nottingham, 6-10 Sept. 2006, Geol. Soc. Of London, Paper 603, 1-7
6 Whiteley, R. J., and Eccleston, P. J., 2006, Comparison of shallow seismic refraction interpretation methods for regolith mapping: Exploration Geophysics 37, 340-347. doi: 10.1071/EG06340   DOI
7 Leung, T. M.,Win, M. A.,Walker, C. S., and Whiteley, R. J., 1997, A flexible algorithm for seismic refraction interpretation using program REFRACT in Modern Geophysics in Engineering Geology. Geol. Soc. Engineering. Geol. Spec. Pub. 12, D. M. Eddleston, et al. eds, 399-407
8 Anderson, J., and Ringis, J., 1999, Continuous seismic refraction profiling - a major advance in geophysical investigations for port and dredging projects: Proceeding 14th Australian Coastal & Ocean Engineering Conference, April 1999, Perth, Western Australia, 40-45
9 Whiteley, B., 2002, Integrating geophysical and geotechnical technologies for improved site assessment of ports and harbours. PIANC 2002, Proceeding 30th International Navigation Congress, Sydney, Sept. 2002, 127-139
10 Caulfield, D. D., Ballard, R., and Leist, R. L., 2005, Analytical techniques for shallow marine near-surface geotechnical parameter estimation, in D. W. Butler, ed, Near Surface Geophysics, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 707-725
11 Bertin, X., and Chaumillon, E., 2005, Newinsights in shallowgas generation from very high resolution seismic and bathymetric surveys in the Marennes-Oleron Bay, France: Marine Geophysical Researches 26, 225-233. doi: 10.1007/s11001-005-3720-y   DOI
12 Whiteley, R. J., 2000, Seismic imaging of ground conditions from buried conduits and boreholes: Proceeding Paris 2000 Petrophysics meets Geophysics, Paris, France, 6-8 Nov. 2000 , paper B-15
13 Whiteley, R. J., 2004, Geotechnical and tunnelling conditions below buried valleys in Sydney, Australia, in Underground space use: analysis of the past and lessons for the future, Erdem and Solak, eds, Taylor and Francis Group, London, 669-673
14 Missiaen, T., Wardell, T., and Dix, J., eds, 2005, Subsurface imaging and sediment characterisation in shallow water environments: Marine Geophysical Researches 26, 83-328   DOI
15 Hamilton, E. L., 1980, Geoacoustic modelling of the sea floor: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68, 1313-1340. doi: 10.1121/1.385100   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Mosher, D. C., and Simpkins, P. G., 1999, Status and trends of marine high-resolution seismic reflection profiling: data acquisition: Geoscience Canada 26, 174-188
17 TTI, 2000, Sydney's Northside StorageTunnel alliance holding upwell under pressure, in Tunnels & Tunnelling International, May 2000, 37-40
18 Whiteley, R. J., Ameratunga, J., and Boyle, P. J., 2005, Assessment of sand quality using seismic techniques at Fisherman Islands, Brisbane. Proceeding 1st International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics ISFOG, Gourvenec and Cassidy, eds, Taylor & Francis Group, London
19 Whiteley, R. J., and Hawkins, L.V., 2005, Short Note: early seismic refraction and gravity exploration over the MVT lead-zinc deposit, Western Australia: Exploration Geophysics 36, 407-409. doi: 10.1071/EG05407   DOI
20 Whiteley, R. J., 2005, Gravity mapping and seismic imaging of large tunnel routes in Sydney, Australia, in Near SurfaceGeophysics,D.K. Butler, ed., Investigations in Geophysics 13, Soc. Explor. Geophys., Tulsa, 503-512
21 Whiteley, R. J., and Greenhalgh, S. A., 1979, Velocity inversion and the shallow seismic refraction method: Geoexploration 17, 125-141. doi: 10.1016/0016-7142(79)90036-X   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Whiteley, R. J., 1983, Recent developments in the application of geophysics to geotechnical engineering, in M. C. Ervin, ed., In-situ Testing for Geotechnical Investigations, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 87-110
23 Puech, A., Rivoallan, X., and Cherel, L., 2004, The use of surface waves in the characterisation of seabed sediments: development of a MASW system for offshore use. Proceeding Colloque "caracterisation in situ des fonds marins". Seatech Week, Brest, France 21-22(Oct), 1-11
24 Henderson, A. D., and Cuttler, R. J., 1999, Northside Storage Tunnel Project. Proceeding 10th Aust. Tunnelling Conference, Melbourne, Vic. 21-24 March, 1999, 47-53