Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2020.9.4.269

Effects of dynamic taping on shoulder joint proprioception  

Park, So-Young (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Daejeon University)
Kim, Min-Ji (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Daejeon University)
Seol, So-Eun (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Daejeon University)
Hwang, Chan (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Daejeon University)
Hong, Ji-Su (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Daejeon University)
Kim, Ho (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Daejeon University)
Shin, Won-Seob (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Medical Science, Daejeon University)
Publication Information
Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science / v.9, no.4, 2020 , pp. 269-274 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: There are many cases of applying various taping methods to prevent muscle damage and to assist with movement. The purpose of this study was to investigate and to compare the effects of dynamic taping on joint position sense and to find out the difference in error values during various degrees of shoulder flexion. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A total of 20 subjects participated in this study with a randomized cross-over design. The order of taping was adjusted by randomly proceeding with dynamic taping, sham taping, and no taping. After the taping, the proprioception of the shoulder joint was evaluated. The evaluation of proprioceptive sensation was performed by evaluating joint position sensation. The sequence was adjusted by randomly performing joint position tests at each shoulder flexion of 50, 90, and 110 degrees. All angles were repeated 3 times. Results: There was a significant difference between dynamic taping and no taping in 50 degrees of shoulder flexion. There was a significant difference between sham taping and no taping in 90 degrees of shoulder flexion (p<0.05). No significant difference was found in 110 degrees of shoulder flexion. Conclusions: In this study, it was confirmed that dynamic taping is effective in improving the joint position sense in 50 degrees of shoulder flexion. In the future, it is expected that further studies will be conducted on patients with shoulder dysfunction with decreased proprioception.
Keywords
Motion; Muscles; Proprioception; Shoulder;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Park SJ, Kim SY. The effect of scapular dynamic taping on pain, disability, upper body posture and range of motion in the postoperative shoulder. J Korean Soc Phys Med 2018;13:149-62.
2 Worsley P, Warner M, Mottram S, Gadola S, Veeger HE, Hermens H, et al. Motor control retraining exercises for shoulder impingement: effects on function, muscle activation, and biomechanics in young adults. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:e11-9.
3 Bittencourt N, Leite M, Zuin A, Pereira M, Goncalves G, Signoretti S. Dynamic taping and high frontal plane knee projection angle in female volleyball athletes. Br J Sports Med 2017;51:297-8.
4 Lim O, Park S. Comparison of the effects of barefoot, kinesio tape, and dynamic tape on static and dynamic balance in subjects with asymptomatic flexible. Phys Ther Korea 2020;27:78-86.
5 Kwon O, Kim H, Shin W. Comparison of the effects of different types of taping on static and dynamic balance in adults with chronic ankle instability. J Korean Soc Integr Med 2020;8:27-36.
6 Burfeind SM, Chimera N. Randomized control trial investigating the effects of kinesiology tape on shoulder proprioception. J Sport Rehabil 2015;24:405-12.
7 Lee D. Effects of theraband exercise programs on strength, balance and proprioception in elderly. J Korean Soc Integr Med 2014;2:1-8.
8 Aytar A, Ozunlu N, Surenkok O, Baltaci G, Oztop P, Karatas M. Initial effects of kinesio® taping in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized, double-blind study. Isokinet Exerc Sci 2011;19:135-42.
9 Aarseth LM, Suprak DN, Chalmers GR, Lyon L, Dahlquist DT. Kinesio tape and shoulder-joint position sense. J Athl Train 2015;50:785-91.
10 Thelen MD, Dauber JA, Stoneman PD. The clinical efficacy of kinesio tape for shoulder pain: a randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008;38:389-95.
11 Lin JJ, Hung CJ, Yang PL. The effects of scapular taping on electromyographic muscle activity and proprioception feedback in healthy shoulders. J Orthop Res 2011;29:53-7.
12 Xiao J, Cui GQ, Wang JQ. Diagnosis of bursal-side partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Orthop Surg 2010;2:260-5.
13 Jeka JJ, Lackner JR. Fingertip contact influences human postural control. Exp Brain Res 1994;100:495-502.
14 Chapman J, Suprak DN, Karduna AR. Unconstrained shoulder joint position sense does not change with body orientation. J Orthop Res 2009;27:885-90.
15 Janwantanakul P, Magarey ME, Jones MA, Dansie BR. Variation in shoulder position sense at mid and extreme range of motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:840-4.
16 Hertel J. Functional anatomy, pathomechanics, and pathophysiology of lateral ankle instability. J Athl Train 2002;37:364-75.
17 Bloem BR, Allum JH, Carpenter MG, Honegger F. Is lower leg proprioception essential for triggering human automatic postural responses? Exp Brain Res 2000;130:375-91.
18 Lee JN, Lim CG. Effects of scapular taping on muscle activity, pain, range of motion and proprioception in subacute stroke patients. J Korea Acad Ind Soc 2013;14:5689-97.
19 McClure P, Tate AR, Kareha S, Irwin D, Zlupko E. A clinical method for identifying scapular dyskinesis, part 1: reliability. J Athl Train 2009;44:160-4.
20 Shaheen AF, Bull AM, Alexander CM. Rigid and Elastic taping changes scapular kinematics and pain in subjects with shoulder impingement syndrome; an experimental study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2015;25:84-92.
21 Park JT, Kim GD, Han GS. The effects of kinesio taping application on isometric muscular strength of knee joint in each angles of extension, flexion. Korean J Sports Sci 2009;18:1065-74.
22 McNeill W, Pedersen C. Dynamic tape. Is it all about controlling load? J Bodyw Mov Ther 2016;20:179-88.
23 Seo HD, Kim MY, Choi JE, Lim GH, Jung SI, Park SH, et al. Effects of Kinesio taping on joint position sense of the ankle. J Phys Ther Sci 2016;28:1158-60.
24 de la Cruz Torresa B, Albornoz Cabelloa M, Espejo Antunez L. [Immediate effect of Dynamic Tape® on external torsion tibial clinically painful in a football player. A case report]. Rev Andal Med Deport 2016;9:50-3. Spanish.
25 Huang T, Kim S. The effectiveness of upper limb offload dynamic taping technique on scapular muscles activation during elevation in healthy subjects. Phys Ther Korea 2020;27:93-101.
26 Kuni B, Mussler J, Kalkum E, Schmitt H, Wolf SI. Effect of kinesiotaping, non-elastic taping and bracing on segmental foot kinematics during drop landing in healthy subjects and subjects with chronic ankle instability. Physiotherapy 2016;102:287-93.