Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2020.32.1.1

Effect of Action Observational Training on Gait in People with Stroke  

Lee, JongSu (Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate school, Daegu University)
Kim, YoungMi (Department of Physical Therapy, Andong Science College)
Lee, DongKyu (Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate school, Daegu University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy / v.32, no.1, 2020 , pp. 1-6 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined the effects of action observational training to improve the gait function for patients with stroke. Methods: The participants were divided into two groups: right hemiplegia group (n=12) and left hemiplegia group (n=12). All groups received conventional therapy for five sessions for 30 minutes, each for three weeks. Left and right hemiplegia group practiced additional action observational training for five sessions for 20 minutes each for three weeks. They participated in three weeks of action observational training coupled with immediate physical practice (intervention), followed by a final assessment. The duration of each action observation video sequence was 10 minutes, followed immediately by practice of the observed motor skill (10 minutes). The gait velocity, cadence, swing time, step length, and BOS (base of support) were examined using the GAITRite system. Results: The results of this study showed significant improvement in the gait function. The outcomes of the gait abilities from gait velocity, cadence, swing time, step length of the affected side, and BOS (base of support) were improved significantly in the right hemiplegia group (p<0.05). In the left hemiplegia group, there was no significant improvement in the gait velocity, cadence, and BOS except for the swing time and step length of the affected side. The left and right group comparisons between the groups were not significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Action observation training improves the gait function. These results suggest that action observational training is feasible and suitable for stroke patients.
Keywords
Action observation; Gait; Stroke;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM et al. Functional mri evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 80(1):4-12.   DOI
2 Pelosin E, Avanzino L, Bove M et al. Action observation improves freezing of gait in patients with parkinson's disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(8):746-52.   DOI
3 Horn RR, Williams AM, Scott MA. Learning from demonstrations: the role of visual search during observational learning from video and point-light models. J Sports Sci. 2002;20(3):253-69.   DOI
4 Williams JH, Whiten A, Suddendorf T et al. Imitation, mirror neurons and autism. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001;25(4):287-95.   DOI
5 Kim JH, Chung EJ, Lee BH. A study of analysis of the brain wave with respected to action observation and motor imagery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(7):779-82.   DOI
6 Vivek Y, Robert LS. Limb dominance results from asymmetries in predictive and impedance control mechanisms. PLOS One. 2014; vol.9(4)article e93892
7 Saandeep M, Pratik KM, Andrzej P et al. Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms. Brain. 2013;136(4):1288-303.   DOI
8 Kathleen AG, Lisa AZ, Savio WW et al. Modulating the motor system by action observation after stroke. Stroke. 2013 ;44(8): 2247-2253.   DOI
9 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-98.   DOI
10 McDonough AL, Batavia M, Chen FC et al. The validity and reliability of the gaitrite system's measurements: A preliminary evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(3):419-25.   DOI
11 Park H-R, Kim J-M, Lee M-K et al. Clinical feasibility of action observation training for walking function of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical rehabilitation. 2014; 28(8):794-803.   DOI
12 van Uden CJ, Besser MP. Test-retest reliability of temporal and spatial gait characteristics measured with an instrumented walkway system (gaitrite). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004;5:13.   DOI
13 Kim JH, Lee BH. Action observation training for functional activities after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(4):565-74.   DOI
14 Lee HM, Lee JA. The effects of dual-task action observation physical training on the walking ability and activities of daily living in chronic stroke patients. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2016;11(2):83-91.   DOI
15 Kim J-C, Lee H-M. The effect of action observation training on sit to walk with chronic stroke patients. The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy. 2015;27(6):413-8.   DOI
16 Halliday SE, Winter DA, Frank JS et al. The initiation of gait in young, elderly, and parkinson's disease subjects. Gait Posture. 1998;8(1):8-14.   DOI
17 Kim JS. The effect of action observation on gait in hemiparesis patients. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2012; 13(8):3610-7   DOI
18 Park HR, Kim JM, Lee MK et al. Clinical feasibility of action observation training for walking function of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(8):794-803.   DOI
19 Kang KY. Effects of observed action gait training on spatio-temporal parameter and motivation of rehabilitation in stroke patients. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2013;8(3):351-60.   DOI
20 Lamontagne A, Fung J. Faster is better: Implications for speed-intensive gait training after stroke. Stroke. 2004;35(11):2543-8.   DOI
21 Tong RK, Ng MF, Li LS. Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(10):1298-304.   DOI
22 de Quervain IAK, Simon SR, Leurgans S et al. Gait pattern in the early recovery period after stroke. JBJS. 1996;78(10):1506-14.   DOI
23 Kim TH, Park SB. Changes in the electroencephalogram patterns during motor imagery and action observation of elbow flexion and extension. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies. 2007;31(11):987-99.   DOI
24 Yang YP, Kim SJ. The Effect of Action Observation with Observation Type on Limits of Stability and Dynamic Gait Ability in Stroke Patients. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2017;12(1):67-74.   DOI
25 Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(4):415-21.   DOI
26 Bogey RA, Barnes LA, Perry J. Computer algorithms to characterize individual subject emg profiles during gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(9):835-41.
27 Kim CM, Eng JJ. The relationship of lower-extremity muscle torque to locomotor performance in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2003;83(1): 49-57.   DOI
28 Eng JJ, Winter DA, Patla AE. Strategies for recovery from a trip in early and late swing during human walking. Exp Brain Res. 1994;102(2):339-49.
29 Garrison KA, Winstein CJ, Aziz-Zadeh L. The mirror neuron system: A neural substrate for methods in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(5):404-12.   DOI
30 Mulder T, Hochstenbach JB, van Heuvelen MJ et al. Motor imagery: the relation between age and imagery capacity. Hum Mov Sci. 2007;26(2): 203-11.   DOI
31 Decety J, Perani D, Jeannerod M et al. Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature. 1994;371(6498):600-2.   DOI
32 Filimon F, Nelson JD, Hagler DJ et al. Human cortical representations for reaching: mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. Neuroimage. 2007;37(4):1315-28.   DOI
33 PatlaElble RJ, Thomas SS, Higgins C et al. Stride-dependent changes in gait of older people. J Neurol. 1991;238(1):1-5.   DOI
34 Jackson PL, Doyon J, Richards CL et al. The efficacy of combined physical and mental practice in the learning of a foot-sequence task after stroke: A case report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18(2):106-11.   DOI