1 |
WHO. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment. Geneva, WHO. 2013.
|
2 |
Tse T, Douglas J, Lentin P et al. Measuring participation after stroke: a review of frequently used tools. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(1):177-92.
DOI
|
3 |
WHO. Toward a common language for functioning, disability and health. http://wwwwhoint/classifications/icf/icfbeginnersguidepdf. 2002.
|
4 |
Lee H, Song J. Which information is commonly used for patients with stroke at rehabilitation settings? J Kor Phys Ther. 2015;27(6):392-9.
DOI
|
5 |
Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:201-11.
|
6 |
Kohler F, Connolly C, Sakaria A et al. Can the ICF be used as a rehabilitation outcome measure? A study looking at the inter-and intra-rater reliability of ICF categories derived from an adl assessment tool. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(9):881-7.
DOI
|
7 |
Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(6):315-40.
DOI
|
8 |
Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(9): 507-28.
DOI
|
9 |
Song J, Lee H. Investigating functional level in patients with stroke using ICF concept. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(5):351-7.
|
10 |
Lee H, Song J. The Korean language version of stroke impact scale 3.0: cross-cultural adaptation and translation. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2015;10(3):47-55.
DOI
|
11 |
Jung H, Park B, Shin H et al. Development of the Korean version of modified Barthel index (K-MBI): multi-center study for subjects with stroke. J Kor Acad Rehabil Med 2007;31(3):283-97.
|
12 |
Kwon Y, Park J, No I. Standardization of Korean of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE-K) for use in the elderly. Part ii. Diagnostic validity. Neuropsychiatric association. 1989;28(3):508-13.
|
13 |
Ware J, Sherbourne CD. The mos 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6): 473-83.
DOI
|
14 |
Campos TF, Rodrigues CA, Farias IMA et al. Comparison of instruments for sleep, cognition and function evaluation in stroke patients according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Braz J Phys Ther. 2012;16(1):23-9.
DOI
|
15 |
Lee H, Song J. Development of revised Korean version of ICF. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(5):344-50.
|
16 |
WHO. International classification of functioning, disability, and health: Korean version. 2nd. Seoul, WHO. 2016.
|
17 |
Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212-8.
DOI
|
18 |
Schepers VPM, Ketelaar M, van de Port IGL et al. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(3):221-30.
DOI
|
19 |
Moriello C, Byrne K, Cieza A et al. Mapping the stroke impact scale (SIS-16) to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(2):102-6.
DOI
|
20 |
De Vriendt P, Gorus E, Bautmans I et al. Conversion of the mini-mental state examination to the international classification of functioning, disability and health terminology and scoring system. Gerontology. 2012;58(2):112-9.
DOI
|
21 |
Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(5):1225-37.
DOI
|