Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.5.341

Mapping Items of Functioning Questionnaires into the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Stroke  

Song, Ju-Min (Department of Physical Therapy, Silla University)
Lee, Hae-Jung (Department of Physical Therapy, Silla University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy / v.28, no.5, 2016 , pp. 341-347 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate items of commonly used questionnaires that measure functioning status of persons with stroke and map to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Methods: Eighty-six patients with stroke were recruited from 12 medical institutes for the study. Each item of the Modified Bathel Index (MBI), Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), Mini Mental Status Evaluation (MMSE) and SF-36 were examined and compared its concept with the ICF. Concept linking was performed by 10 health professionals independently. A field test was performed to assess its correlation between those of scales and their linked ICF category sets. Results: It was found that 11 items in MBI was linked to 14 ICF categories, whereas 27 items of MMSE had 10 categories of ICF linked. 60 items of SIS were to be linked with 35 ICF categories. Agreement between professionals in linking was found to be high: 97.5% for MBI items, 78.0%, 78.0%, and 74.8% for MMSE, SIS, and SF-36 respectively. Strong relationship was observed between measurement scales and linked ICF code sets (r=-0.76 for SIS, r=-0.78 for MBI, r=-0.47 for MMSE) whereas there was no relationship was found between SF-36 and its ICF code set (r=-0.06) from the field test. Conclusion: It was found that items of SIS, MMSE and MBI may be linked to ICF categories. Those of linking concept between clinical tools and the ICF could be helpful for clinical data standardization.
Keywords
Stroke; Functional measure; ICF;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 WHO. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment. Geneva, WHO. 2013.
2 Tse T, Douglas J, Lentin P et al. Measuring participation after stroke: a review of frequently used tools. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(1):177-92.   DOI
3 WHO. Toward a common language for functioning, disability and health. http://wwwwhoint/classifications/icf/icfbeginnersguidepdf. 2002.
4 Lee H, Song J. Which information is commonly used for patients with stroke at rehabilitation settings? J Kor Phys Ther. 2015;27(6):392-9.   DOI
5 Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:201-11.
6 Kohler F, Connolly C, Sakaria A et al. Can the ICF be used as a rehabilitation outcome measure? A study looking at the inter-and intra-rater reliability of ICF categories derived from an adl assessment tool. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(9):881-7.   DOI
7 Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(6):315-40.   DOI
8 Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(9): 507-28.   DOI
9 Song J, Lee H. Investigating functional level in patients with stroke using ICF concept. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(5):351-7.
10 Lee H, Song J. The Korean language version of stroke impact scale 3.0: cross-cultural adaptation and translation. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2015;10(3):47-55.   DOI
11 Jung H, Park B, Shin H et al. Development of the Korean version of modified Barthel index (K-MBI): multi-center study for subjects with stroke. J Kor Acad Rehabil Med 2007;31(3):283-97.
12 Kwon Y, Park J, No I. Standardization of Korean of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE-K) for use in the elderly. Part ii. Diagnostic validity. Neuropsychiatric association. 1989;28(3):508-13.
13 Ware J, Sherbourne CD. The mos 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6): 473-83.   DOI
14 Campos TF, Rodrigues CA, Farias IMA et al. Comparison of instruments for sleep, cognition and function evaluation in stroke patients according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Braz J Phys Ther. 2012;16(1):23-9.   DOI
15 Lee H, Song J. Development of revised Korean version of ICF. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(5):344-50.
16 WHO. International classification of functioning, disability, and health: Korean version. 2nd. Seoul, WHO. 2016.
17 Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212-8.   DOI
18 Schepers VPM, Ketelaar M, van de Port IGL et al. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(3):221-30.   DOI
19 Moriello C, Byrne K, Cieza A et al. Mapping the stroke impact scale (SIS-16) to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(2):102-6.   DOI
20 De Vriendt P, Gorus E, Bautmans I et al. Conversion of the mini-mental state examination to the international classification of functioning, disability and health terminology and scoring system. Gerontology. 2012;58(2):112-9.   DOI
21 Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(5):1225-37.   DOI