Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22755/KJCHS.2022.55.1.151

The analysis for attributes of OUV of the capital of Shilla Kingdom  

KIM, Euiyeon (Gyeongju National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science / v.55, no.1, 2022 , pp. 151-174 More about this Journal
Abstract
According to the "Special Act on the Restoration and Maintenance of the Core Relics of the Shilla Kingdom" enacted in 2019, the Shilla Kingdom refers to the capital of Shilla and Unified Shilla period, and refers to Gyeongju, where the king lived, and the nearby area. Shilla Wanggyeong is a heritage registered on the UNESCO World Heritage List in 2000 under the name of Gyeongju Historic Site and belongs to Wolseong District, Hwangnyongsa District, and Daeneungwon District among the five districts registered as Gyeongju Historic Site. Unlike the Namsan and Sanseong districts, the Shilla Kingdom is a heritage consisting mostly of archaeological sites without physical substance. Gyeongju City sought to promote local tourism while providing more direct experiences to visitors by restoring the heritage that constitutes the Shilla Kingdom. Starting with the restoration of Woljeonggyo Bridge in 2005, the Shilla Wanggyeong restoration project began in earnest. Gyeongju City tried to restore the building site on the west side of Donggung Palace and Wolji after Woljeonggyo Bridge, but it was canceled due to opposition from the UNESCO World Heritage Committee. The World Heritage Committee opposed the restoration and recommended a heritage impact assessment for similar projects in the future. During the miscarriage impact assessment procedure, there is an OUV attribute analysis process of the heritage to be evaluated. This study intends to preemptively derive OUV attributes for the Silla Kingdom through literature and overseas case analysis. In the case of literature research, domestic and foreign research data related to the UNESCO World Heritage Convention and World Heritage Management were examined, and in overseas cases, the architectural works of Krakow Historical District, Stonehenge and Abbury Geoseok Ruins in England, and Le Corbusier were analyzed. Through this, the outstanding universal value attributes of the Silla Kingdom were derived. This study is expected to be used as a reference in the process of restoration projects of other heritage constituting the Shilla Kingdom or construction plans in nearby areas in the future and serve as an indicator to improve the management system of the Shilla Kingdom more efficiently from the perspective of world heritage.
Keywords
the Captial of Shilla; World Heritage; HIA; Reconstruction; OUV;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 UNESCO, 2005, Operation Guidelines for the Implementation of the world heritage convention, p.14.
2 IUCN, 2008, Outstanding Universal Value: Standards for Natural World Heritage, A Compendium on Standards for inscriptions of Natural Properties on the World Heritage list, p.2.
3 UNESCO, 1977, Operation Guidelines for the Implementation of the world heritage convention
4 UNESCO, 1980, Operation Guidelines for the Implementation of the world heritage convention, p.5.
5 UNESCO, 2005, Special Expert Meeting of the World Heritage Convention: the Concept of Outstanding Universal Value, Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, pp.21~29.
6 UNESCO, 2009, WHC-09/33.COM/8E
7 김가영, 2016, 「한국 비무장지대(DMZ)의 유네스코 세계문화유산적 가치에 관한 연구 -전쟁.분단 관련 유산을 중심으로-」, 한국전통문화대학교 문화유산융합대학원 수리복원학과 석사학위 논문
8 박희성, 2019, 「쑤저우 정원의 OUV와 보호관리의 운영방식」, 「한국전통조경학회지」37(1), 한국전통조경학회
9 오소미, 2017, 「세계유산 관점에서 본 한옥교회의 탁월한 보편적 가치 분석」, 건국대학교 대학원 세계유산학과 석사학위 논문
10 우경식 외 2인, 2017, 「한국 다도해갯벌의 탁월한 보편적 가치」, 「대한지질학회 학술대회」, 대한지질학회
11 조효상, 2013, 「世界遺産協約의 基礎槪念 硏究 -卓越한 普遍的 價値, 眞正性, 完全性에 關하여-」, 한남대학교 대학원 문화재학과 석사학위 논문
12 경주시청, 2018, 「2017 경주시 관광실태조사 보고서」
13 국립경주문화재연구소, 2020, 「세계유산 보존관리 제도와 경주 월성」, pp.23~26.
14 문화재청, 2017, 「세계유산협약 이행을 위한 운영지침」
15 東京文化財研究所, 2019, 「世界文化遺産の遺産影響評価に関する調査研究事業報告書」
16 문화재청, 2019, 「세계유산협약 이행을 위한 운영지침」, p.24, p.38.
17 Highway England, 2018, A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Heritage Impact Assessment Scoping Report, pp.23~24.
18 문화재청, 2019, 「세계문화유산을 위한 유산영향평가 지침」, pp.17~24.
19 Kalman, Herold, 2021, Heritage Planning, Routeledge, pp.401~403.
20 UNESCO, 1998, Report of the World Heritage Global Strategy Natural and Cultural Heritage Expert Meeting, pp.13~16.
21 UNESCO, 2008, World Heritage Papers 25: World Heritage and Buffer Zones
22 한아선, 2014, 「낙안읍성의 역사문화환경 보존지역 설정방안에 관한 연구 -탁월한 보편적 가치(OUV)를 중심으로-」, 명지대학교 대학원 건축학과 석사학위 논문
23 현상규, 2016, 「세계유산의 탁월한 보편적 가치(Outstanding Universal Value) 발굴을 위한 해안경관 특성에 관한 연구 -월곶.갑곶.오두.초지돈대를 중심으로-」, 상명대학교 대학원 환경자원학과 박사학위 논문
24 Denyer, Susan, 2011, Retrospective Statements of OUV for World Heritage Properties: Authenticity & Integrity, Workshop for the 2nd Cycle of World Heritage Periodic Reporting for Western Europe, ICOMOS, pp.10~19.
25 Jokilehto, Jukka, 2008, What is OUV? Defining the Outstanding Universal Value of Cultural World Heritage Properties, Monuments and Sites, ICOMOS
26 Ugarte, Katti Osorio, 2012, The Attributes of Outstanding Universal Value of a World Heritage Property: The case of the Archaeological Site of Panama Viejo and Historic District of Panama, Canto Rodado No.7
27 국가문화유산포털 https://www.heritage.go.kr
28 유네스코와 유산 https://heritage.unesco.or.kr
29 유네스코 세계유산 홈페이지 https://whc.unesco.org
30 Sanjbod, Hannaneh Sobhani, Hermans, Luuk, Rejinders, Daniek & Veldpaus, Loes, 2016, Captain, where can we find the attributes?, The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice 7:2-3, Routeledge
31 류성룡, 2016, 「한국의 전통산사 OUV 도출을 위한 공간 특성 연구 - 조선후기 고지도와 건조유물 변화기록을 이용하여」, 「한국문화공간건축학회논문집」53, 한국문화공간건축학회
32 존 허드, 2010, 「세계문화유산도시와 탁월한 보편적 가치 정립의 난관」, 「향토서울」75, 서울역사편찬원