Browse > Article

Study on the Urethane Restoration Filling Material and Adhesive for Stone Cultural Heritage  

Han, Won-Sik (The Research Center of Conservation Science for Cultural Heritage, Hanseo University)
Lee, Ho-Youn (The Research Center of Conservation Science for Cultural Heritage, Hanseo University)
Park, Gi-Jung (Department of Conservation Science, Seoul Museum of History)
Hong, Tae-Kee (Department of Chemistry, Hanseo University)
Wi, Koang-Chul (The Research Center of Conservation Science for Cultural Heritage, Hanseo University)
Publication Information
Journal of Conservation Science / v.27, no.1, 2011 , pp. 115-121 More about this Journal
Abstract
A Urethane resin restoration material was made to be used in the restoration of stone cultural assets. The Urethane resin restoration material showed strong adhesive strength and tensile strength similar to epoxy recovery material, which had been mainly used for the recovery of stone cultural assets. The sealing property, anti-shrinking property and paint-ability of Urethane resin restoration material are also similar to existing epoxy system restoration materials. Especially, this Urethane resin restration material is expected to give permanence and continuous stability in the restoration of cultural assets made in stone by resolving the two big issues of existing epoxy recovery material, which are 'yellowing' and 'ir-reversibility'. This Urethane resin restration material had been directly applied as a filling material and adhesive and it was dissolved again. The Urethane resin, which had been used for the recovery, was able to be perfectly removed, which means that this Urethane resin recovery material has perfect reversibility. This Urethane resin restoration material also has enhanced convenience since user can adjust the working-life dependent on work environment. It is believed that this Urethane resin restoration material can also be used as a filling material or adhesive for other cultural assets made of ceramic or metal heritage, in addition to stone, since it has strong adhesive strength and tensile strength.
Keywords
Unfading property; Stone cultural heritage; Reversible property; Urethane; Restoration material;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 이명성, 정민호, 정영동, 이찬희, "경주 서악리 삼층석탑의 훼손 상태 및 보존 처리". 보존과학회지, 18, p63-74, (2006).
2 강추원, 박현식, 김수로, "풍화 암반의 공학적 특성 및 변형거동에 관한 연구". Explosives and Blasting, 22, p33-43, (2004).
3 정종현, 정민호, 손병현, "경주 지역 석조문화재 풍화 기후 특성". 신라문화, 30, p243-272, (2007).
4 황연, 황선도, 강대식, 박해미, "문화재 복원용 무기계 수지의 합성 및 특성". 보존과학회지, 25, p17-24, (2009).
5 도진영, 조현구, "규산염질 암석으로 구성된 석조문화재의 산성비에 의한 손상 임상 연구". 한국광물학회지, 23, p63-71, (2010).
6 김사덕, 황진주, 강대일, "대리석 문화재에 대한 산성비의 영향". 보존과학회지, 7, p19-22, (1998).
7 정종현, "경주 및 주변 지역 대기 오염물질의 보건 환경위해성 평가와 석조문화제 풍화에 미치는 영향". 대구한의대학교 대학원, p1-14, (2008).
8 이용희, "문화재 보존처리재료". 국립문화재연구소, 보존 과학기초연수교육, p223, (2005).
9 이성민, "석조 문화재 보존 연구의 세계적 추세". 한국구조물진단학회지, 5, p88-91, (2001).
10 송치영, 한민수, 이장존, 전병규, 도민환, "석조 문화재 보존 처리에 사용되는 혼합 충전제의 특성 분석". 보존과학회지, 25, p439-450, (2009).
11 도진영, "석조 문화재의 손상에 미치는 보수처리제의 영향". 경주문화연구, 1, p29-44, (2006).
12 이장존, 한민수, 전병규, 송치영, 김사덕, "경주 남산 석조문화재를 대상으로 보존처리제의 처리에 대한 정량적 평가". 대한지질공학회, 1, p186, (2008).