Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.3.103

A Study on the Characteristics by Keyword Types in the Intellectual Structure Analysis Based on Co-word Analysis: Focusing on Overseas Open Access Field  

Kim, Pan Jun (신라대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / v.55, no.3, 2021 , pp. 103-129 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study examined the characteristics of two keyword types expressing the topics in the intellectual structure analysis based on the co-word analysis, focused on overseas open access field. Specifically, the keyword set extracted from the LISTA database in the field of library and information science was divided into two types (controlled keywords and uncontrolled keywords), and the results of performing intellectual structure analysis based on co-word analysis were compared. As a result, the two keyword types showed significant differences by keyword sets, research maps and influences, and periods. Therefore, in intellectual structure analysis based on co-word analysis, the characteristics of each keyword type should be considered according to the purpose of the study. In other words, it would be more appropriate to use controlled keywords for the purpose of examining the overall research trend in a specific field from the perspective of the entire academic field, and to use uncontrolled keywords for the purpose of identifying detailed trends by research area from the perspective of the specific field. In addition, for a comprehensive intellectual structure analysis that reflects both viewpoints, it can be said that it is most desirable to compare and analyze the results of using controlled keywords and uncontrolled keywords individually.
Keywords
Intellectual Structure Analysis; Co-word Analysis; Keyword Types; Characteristics; Overseas Open Access;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Garfield, E. (1990). Keywords Plus: ISI's breakthrough retrieval method. Part 1. expanding your searching power on current contents on diskette. Current Contents, 13(32), 295-299. Available: http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v13p295y1990.pdf
2 Hu, C. P., Hu, J. M., Deng, S. L., & Liu, Y. (2013). A co-word analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics, 97(2), 369-382. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1076-7   DOI
3 Hu, J. & Zhang, Y. (2015). Research patterns and trends of recommendation system in China using co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 51(4), 329-339. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.02.002   DOI
4 Janssens, F., Leta, J., Glanzel, W., & Moor, B. D. (2006). Towards mapping library and information science. Information Processing & Management, 42(6), 1614-1642. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.025   DOI
5 Jiang, X., Sun, X., & Zhuge, H. (2013). Graph-based algorithms for ranking researchers: not all swans are white!. Scientometrics, 96(3), 743-759. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0943-y   DOI
6 Khasseh, A. A., Soheili, F., Moghaddam, H. S., & Chelak, A. M. (2017). Intellectual structure of knowledge in i-Metrics. Information Processing & Management, 53(3), 705-720. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.02.001   DOI
7 Lee, B. & Jeong, YI. (2008). Mapping Korea's national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 3-19. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1819-4   DOI
8 Lee, P. C. & Su, H. N. (2010). Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis. Innovation: Management, Policy, & Practice, 12(1), 26-40. Available: https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.1.26   DOI
9 Library of Congress (2020). Library of Congress Subject Headings PDF Files. Available: https://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeLCSH/freelcsh.html
10 Lee, Jae Yun (2012b). wnet.exe (version 0.4). (Software).
11 Lee, Ji Won (2019). A study on analysis of research trends and intellectual structure of cataloging field. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 36(4), 279-300. Available: https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2019.36.4.279Naver (2020).   DOI
12 An, X. Y. & Wu, Q. Q. (2011). Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting. Scientometrics, 88(1), 133-144. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0374-1   DOI
13 Besselaar, P. V. D. & Heimeriks, G. (2006). Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: a method and an exploratory case study. Scientometrics, 68(3), 377-393. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0118-9   DOI
14 Chiu, W. & Lu, K. (2015). Random walk on co word network: Ranking terms using structural features. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1-11. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010028   DOI
15 Dehdarirad, T., Villarroya, A., & Barrios, M. (2014). Research trends in gender differences in higher education and science: a co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 273-290. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1327-2   DOI
16 Kim, Hyunjung (2018). A study on research trends of library science and information science through analyzing subject headings of doctoral dissertations recently published in the U.S. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(3), 11-39. Available: https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.3.011   DOI
17 Duzyol, G., Taskin, Z., & Tonta, Y. (2010). Mapping the intellectual structure of the open access field through co-citation analysis. In IFLA Satellite Pre-conference: Open Access to Science Information Trends, Models and Strategies for Libraries, Crete (Greece), 6-8 August 2010. (Unpublished) Available: http://eprints.rclis.org/14910/1/tonta-duzyol-taskin-ifla-satellite-2010.pdf
18 Choi, Hyung Wook & Chung, EunKyung (2017). An investigation on characteristics and intellectual structure of sociology by analyzing cited data. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(3), 109-124. Available: https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.3.109   DOI
19 Kang, Beomil & Park, Ji-Hong (2013). Profiling and co-word analysis of teaching korean as a foreign language domain. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 195-213. Available: https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.195   DOI
20 Naver Dictionary. Available: https://dict.naver.com
21 Seo, SunKyung & Chung, EunKyung (2013). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science, 24(1), 207-228. Available: https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2013.24.1.207   DOI
22 Shin, Eun-Ja (2014). A study on APC subsidy policies to encourage OA publishing. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3), 249-270. Available: https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.249   DOI
23 Looze, M. D. & Lemarie, J. (1997). Corpus relevance through co-word analysis: An application to plant proteins. Scientometrics, 39(3), 267-280. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458530   DOI
24 Kim, Ha Jin & Song, Min (2014). A study on the research trends in domestic/international information science articles by co-word analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(1), 99-118. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.099   DOI
25 Wu, C. C. & Leu, H. J. (2014). Examining the trends of technological development in hydrogen energy using patent co-word map analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(33), 19262-19269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.006   DOI
26 Lee, Jae Yun (2006). A study on the network generation methods for examining the intellectual structure of knowledge domains. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(2), 333-355. Available: https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.2.333   DOI
27 Lee, Jae Yun (2012a). cooc.exe (version 0.4). (Software).
28 Liu, G. Y., Hu, J. M., & Wang, H. L. (2012). A co-word analysis of digital library field in China. Scientometrics, 91(1), 203-217. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0586-4   DOI
29 Kim, Hyunjung (2017). A study on the Intellectual Structure of Data Science Using Co-Word Analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(4), 101-126. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.4.101   DOI
30 Kim, Sun-Kyum, Kim, Wan-Jong, Seo, Tae-Sul, & Choi, Hyun-Jin (2019). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis: based on published journals of library and information science during 2013 to 2018. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1), 333-356. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.201903.333   DOI
31 Wen, D. H., Yu, T. C., & Ho, Y. S. (2009). Bibliometric tools applied to analytical articles: the example of gene transfer-related research. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 25(3), 186-199. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750910982575   DOI
32 Xie, S. D., Zhang, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 113-130. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1928-0   DOI
33 Vaughan, L., Yang, R., & Tang, J. (2012). Web co-word analysis for business intelligence in the Chinese environment. Aslib Proceedings, 64(6), 653-667. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211281788   DOI
34 Mikki, S. (2010). Comparing Google scholar and ISI web of science for Earth sciences. Scientometrics, 82(2), 321-331. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0038-6   DOI
35 Shin, Jueun & Kim, Seonghee (2021). A study on the intellectual structure of domestic open access area. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(2), 147-178. Available: https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.2.147   DOI
36 Cho, J. (2014). Intellectual structure of the institutional repository field: a co-word analysis. Journal of Information Science, 40(3), 386-397. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551514524686   DOI
37 Fu, H. Z., Ho, Y. S., Sui, Y. M., & Li, Z. S. (2010). A bibliometric analysis of solid waste research during the period 1993-2008. Waste Management, 30(12), 2410-2417. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.06.008   DOI
38 Huang, Y., Ao, X. L., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate pentachlorophenol research. Scientometrics, 75(1), 67-80. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1849-y   DOI
39 Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Bjork, B-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961. Available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020961   DOI
40 Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, C., Lu, Z., & Duan, Z. (2016). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: a case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 967-972. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437   DOI
41 Ocholla, D. N., Onyancha, O. B., & Britz, J. (2010). Can information ethics be conceptualized by using the core/periphery model. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 492-502. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.05.001   DOI
42 Qin, J. (2000). Semantic similarities between a keyword database and a controlled vocabulary database: an investigation in the antibiotic resistance literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 166-180. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<166::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-Z   DOI
43 Ravikumar, S., Agrahari, A., & Singh, S. N. (2015). Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005-2010). Scientometrics, 102(1), 929-955. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1402-8   DOI
44 Zhao, W., Mao, J., & Lu, K. L. (2018). Ranking themes on co-word networks: exploring the relationships among different metrics. Information Processing & Management 54(2), 203-218. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.11.005   DOI
45 Mao, N., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2010). A bibliometric study of the trend in articles related to risk assessment published in Science Citation Index. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 16(4), 801-824. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2010.501248   DOI