Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.2.147

A Study on the Intellectual Structure of Domestic Open Access Area  

Shin, Jueun (중앙대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과)
Kim, Seonghee (중앙대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / v.55, no.2, 2021 , pp. 147-178 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, co-word analysis was conducted to investigate the intellectual structure of the domestic open access area. Through KCI and RISS, 124 research articles related to open access in Korea were selected for analysis, and a total of 1,157 keywords were extracted from the title and abstract. Network analysis was performed on the selected keywords. As a result, 3 domains and 20 clusters were extracted, and intellectual relations among keywords from open access area were visualized through PFnet. The centrality analysis of weighted networks was used to identify the core keywords in this area. Finally, 5 clusters from cluster analysis were displayed on a multidimensional scaling map, and the intellectual structure was proposed based on the correlation between keywords. The results of this study can visually identify and can be used as basic data for predicting the future direction of open access research in Korea.
Keywords
Open Access; Pathfinder Networks; Cluster Analysis; Multidimensional Scaling; Intellectual Structure;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, Jae-Yun (2006b). Centrality measures for bibliometric network Analysis. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(3), 191-214.   DOI
2 Lee, Jae-Yun (2006c). A novel clustering method for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(4), 215-231.   DOI
3 Lee, Jae-Yun (2007). A comparison analysis of various approaches to multidimensional scaling in mapping a knowledge domain's intellectual structure. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(2), 335-357.   DOI
4 Choi, Yi-Lang (2014). A study on the research trends of archival studies in Korea. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 147-177.
5 Lee, Jae-Yun (2013). A comparison study on the weighted network centrality measures of tnet and WNET. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 241-264.   DOI
6 Joung, Kyoung-Hee (2005). What factors affect the transition in scholarly communication? Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 183-199.   DOI
7 Jo, Hyo-Jeong & Lee, Yong-Gu (2018). Study on the intellectual structure of big data research in Library & Information Science using co-word analysis. Korean Library And Information Science Society Winter Conference, 2018(2), 211-219.
8 Lee, Jae-Yun (2015). A generalized measure for local centralities in weighted networks. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(2), 7-23.   DOI
9 Seo, Sun-Kyung & Chung, Eun-Kyung (2013). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(1), 207-228.   DOI
10 Mokhtarpour, R. & Khasseh, A. A. (2020). Twenty-six years of LIS research focus and hot spots, 1990-2016: a co-word analysis. Journal of Information Science, 1-15.
11 Olmeda-Go'mez, C., Ovalle-Perandones, M., & Perianes-Rodri'guez, A. (2017). Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985-2014. Scientometrics, 113, 195-217.   DOI
12 Onyancha, O. B. (2018). Forty five years of LIS research evolution, 1971-2015: an informetrics study of the author supplied keywords. Publishing Research Quarterly, 34, 456-470.   DOI
13 Chen, C. (2006). Information Visualization: Beyond the Horizon. London: Springer.
14 Ravikumar, S., Agrahari, A., & Singh. S. N. (2015). Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics(2005-2010). Scientometrics, 102, 929-955.   DOI
15 Rodrigues, R. S., Taga, V., & Passos, M. F. d. (2016). Research articles about open access indexed by Scopus: a content analysis. Publications, 4(4), 31.   DOI
16 Choi, Ji-Won (2016). An analytic review of vocation and employment research for youth in labor market by network text analysis. Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 48(4), 183-207.   DOI
17 Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retieval research using co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 37(6), 817-842.   DOI
18 Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239.   DOI
19 Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. psychometrika, 29(2), 115-129.   DOI
20 Ahn, Bu-Young & Song, Chi-Pyoung (2005). Construction of the bibliographic information network prototype for Biology & Life Science. Journal of Information Management, 36(2), 125-151.   DOI
21 Lee, Seon-Min (2016). An Analysis of Research Trend in Case Study of Art Therapy for Children at Inside and Outside of the Country. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
22 Lee, Soo-Sang (2012). Network Analysis Methods. Seoul: NonHyung.
23 Lee, Soo-Sang (2014). A content analysis of journal articles using the language network analysis methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4), 49-68.   DOI
24 White, H. D. & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 32(3), 163-171.   DOI
25 Choi, Jae Hwang & Cho, Hyun Yang (2005). The recent trends of open access movements and the ways to help the cause by academic stakeholders. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 307-326.   DOI
26 Han, Eun-Hyeung & Park, Eun-Hye (2020). Domestic and international research trends of early childhood teacher's practical knowledge using keyword network analysis. Educational Theory and Practice for Infants and Young Children, 5(2), 29-46.
27 Sedighi, M. & Jalalimanesh, A. (2014). Mapping research trends in the field of knowledge management. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 19(1), 71-85.
28 Park, Ok-Nam (2011). Knowledge structures in knowledge organization research. Journal Of The Korean Biblia Society For Library And Information Science, 22(3), 247-267.   DOI
29 Kwon, Seo-Jin (2017). A Comparative Study on the Current Status and Ethics in Research and Publication about Domestic and Reputable International Nursing Journals. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
30 Kim, Sun-Kyum, Kim, Wan-Jong, Seo, Tae-Sul, & Choi, Hyun-Jin (2019). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1), 333-356.   DOI
31 Lee, Jae-Yun (2006a). A study on the network generation methods for examining the intellectual structure of knowledge domains. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(2), 333-355.
32 Xu, F. & Ma, L. (2021). Exploring the research themes and their relationships of LIS in China from 2013 to 2018 using co-word analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 1-9.
33 Zhao, R. & Wu, S. (2014). Study on themes and authors' influence of open access in China. Scientometrics, 101, 1165-1177.   DOI
34 Park, Ji-Yeon (2013). A Study of the Intellectual Structure of Library and Information Science in Korea. Doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University.
35 Park, Han-Woo & Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Understanding the KrKwic: a computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), 1377-1387.
36 Seo, Sang-Hyun & Lee, Yong-Gu (2018). A co-word analysis of titles, author keywords, and abstracts based in Korean LIS journals, 2015-2017. Korean Library And Information Science Society Winter Conference, 2018(2), 203-210.
37 Oliveira, S., Moreira, C., Borbinha, J., & Garcia, M. A. (2015). Thematic identification of "little science": trends in the Portuguese literature in IS&LS by controlled vocabulary and co-word analysis. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4, 421-432.