Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.3.165

A Study on the Separation of Descriptive Levels for Enhancing the Applicability of BIBFRAME  

Yim, Suin (중앙대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과)
Lee, Seungmin (중앙대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / v.54, no.3, 2020 , pp. 165-186 More about this Journal
Abstract
Although BIBFRAME is recognized as a new bibliographic standard that can replace the existing MARC structure, the vastness of the descriptive items shows many limitations to be applied in library communities. Thus this study proposed separating the descriptive levels of BIBFRAME as a way to enhance the applicability of BIBFRAME. The descriptive level of BIBFRAME was divided into three stages: core, standard, and detailed levels based on the bibliographic area of ISBD 2011. This separation was semantically implemented using RDF/RDFS syntax. The levels of description in BIBFRAME was defined as Class Granularity and Class Element, and the Property Relation was defined for the linkage between the Classes defined and the BIBFRAME. By applying this syntactic structure, the relationships between the BIBFRAME descriptive items separated by each descriptive level could be linked with each other. This approach is expected to ensure applicability in the creation and sharing of bibliographic data using BIBFRAME.
Keywords
Cataloging rules; Level of Description; BIBFRAME; BIBFRAME vocabulary; RDF/RDFS;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Rho, Jee-Hyun. 2007. "Meanings of FRBR model in Korean library circumstance." Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(2): 223-244.
2 Park, Ok Nam and Oh, Jung Sun. 2014. "Deployment of BIBFRAME as a new bibliographic framework in linked data." Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(4): 235-263.   DOI
3 Lee, Mihwa. 2017. "A study on the considerations in constructing BIBFRAME by analyzing BIBFRAME 2.0." Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(4): 107-127.   DOI
4 Andresen, Lief. 2018. New format: BIBFRAME in an European perspective - What would be the impact and perspective of BIBFRAME. Presentation in DET KGL. BIBLIOTEK. May 23, 2018. [online] [cited 2020. 7. 2.]
5 Bianchini, Carlo and Guerrini, mauro. 2009. "From bibliographic models to cataloging rules: Remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(2): 105-124.   DOI
6 Balster, Kevin. 2018. "BIBFRAMEing for Non-BIBFRAMErs: An introduction to current and future cataloging practices." The Serials Librarian, 74(1/4): 151-155.   DOI
7 Coyle, K. and Hillmann, D. 2007. Resource Description and Access (RDA). D-Lib Magazine, 13(1/2). [online] [cited 2020. 7. 1.]
8 International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). 2011. International Standard Bibliographic Description: Consolidated Edition.
9 Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules. 2008. RDA: Resource Description and Access: Prospectus.
10 Library of Congress, Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control. 2008. On the record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the future of bibliographic control.
11 Library of Congress. 2016. BIBFRAME frequently asked questions. [online] [cited 2020. 6. 15.]
12 LIBRIS. 2017. BIBFRAME in Libris XL. [online] [cited 2020. 7. 5.]
13 Park, Jung-Ran, Brenza, Andrew and Richards, Lori. 2020. BIBFRAME linked data: A conceptual study on the prevailing content standards and data model. In Linked Open Data: Applications, trends and future developments. [online] [cited 2020. 7. 6.]
14 Yang, Sharon Q. and Lee, Yan Yi. 2016. Six years after RDA: Projects, initiatives, trends and directions. Presentation in New Jersey Library Association annual Conference, May 17, 2016.
15 Picco, Paola and Repiso, Virginia Ortiz. 2012. "The contribution of FRBR to the identification of bibliographic relationships: The new RDA-based ways of representing relationships in catalogs." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5/7): 622-640.   DOI
16 Sprochi, Amanda. 2016. "Where are we headed? Resource Description and Access, Bibliographic Framework, and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Library Reference Model." International Information & Library Review, 48(2): 129-136.   DOI
17 Tharani, K. 2015. "Linked data in libraries: A case study of harvesting and sharing bibliographic metadata with BIBFRAME." Information Technology and Libraries, 34(1): 5-19.   DOI
18 Zou, Xiaozhu et al. 2018. "Constructing metadata schema of scientific and technical report based on FRBR." Computer and Information Science, 11: 34-39.   DOI