1 |
도태현, 정영미. 2013. 대학도서관의 차세대 OPAC 기능 채택과 확산 현황. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 44(2): 197-215.(Doh, Tae-Hyun and Jung, Young-Mi. 2013. "A Study on the Next Generation OPACFunctionalities Diffusion Status and Adoption by Academic Libraries." Journal of KoreanLibrary and Information Science Society, 44(2): 197-215.)
|
2 |
오경은, 김기영. 2008. 문헌분류방식에 따른 도서탐색용이성에 관한 연구: 공공도서관과 대형서점의 분류방식을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 25(4): 25-42.(Oh, Kyong-Eun and Kim, Gi-Yeong. 2008. "A Study on the Convenience in Finding BooksAccording to Classifications: Focused on the Classifications in Public Libraries and Bookstores."Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(4): 25-42.)
DOI
|
3 |
이성숙. 2012. 트랜잭션 로그 분석을 통한 웹기반 온라인목록의 검색행태 추이 분석. 한국비블리아학회지, 23(2): 209-233.(Lee, Sung-Sook. 2012. "Trends of Web-Based OPAC Search Behavior via Transaction LogAnalysis." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 23(2):209-233.)
DOI
|
4 |
이은주. 2014. 디스커버리(Discovery) 통합색인의 품질평가에 관한 연구: EDS를 사례로 하여. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 45(3): 415-440.(Lee, Eun-Ju. 2014. "A Study on Quality Evaluation of Discovery Central Index: The Caseof EDS (EBSCO Discovery Service)." Journal of Korean Library and Information ScienceSociety, 45(3): 415-440.)
|
5 |
한승희, 이지연. 2006. 과학기술분야 연구자의 정보요구별 탐색행태 분석. 제13회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 2006년 8월 1일, 17-22.(Han, Seung Hee and Lee, Jee Yeon. 2006. "Searching Behavior of Scientists and TechnologistsBased on Their Information Needs." In Proceedings of the 13th Korean Society for InformationManagement, August 1, 2006, 17-22.)
|
6 |
Baker, S. L. and Shepherd, G. W. 1987. "Fiction Classification Schemes: The Principles Behind Them and Their Success." RQ, 27(2): 245-251.
|
7 |
Bates, M. J. 2002. "Toward an Integrated Model of Information Seeking and Searching." New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 3: 1-15.
|
8 |
Booth, M. et al. 2012. "From Search to Discovery." In Proceedings of ALIA Biennial Conference 2012, July 10-13, 2012, Sydney: Hilton Hotel. [online] [cited 2015. 6. 14.]
|
9 |
Breeding, M. 2010. "The State of the Art in Library Discovery 2010." Computers in Libraries, 30(1): 31-34.
|
10 |
Case, D. O. ed. 2012. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior. UK: Emerald Group Pub.
|
11 |
Chang, S. and Rice, E. 1993. "Browsing: A Multidimensional Framework." Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 28: 231-76.
|
12 |
Chickering, W. and Yang, Q. 2014. "Evaluation and Comparison of Discovery Tools: An Update." Information Technology and Libraries, 33(2): 5-30.
|
13 |
Foster, A. and Ford, N. 2003. "Serendipity and Information Seeking: An Empirical Study." Journal of Documentation, 59(3): 321-340.
DOI
|
14 |
Macgregor, G. and McCulloch, E. 2006. "Collaborative Tagging As a Knowledge Organisation and Resource Discovery Tool." Library Review, 55(5): 291-300.
DOI
|
15 |
Mercun, T. and Zumer, M. 2008. "New Generation of Catalogues for the New Generation of Users: A Comparison of Six Library Catalogues." Program, 42(3): 243-261.
DOI
|
16 |
Merriam-Webster. 1828. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster. [online] .
|
17 |
Woodward, A. 2005. Creating the Customer-Driven Library: Building on the Bookstore Model. Chicago: American Library Association.
|
18 |
Pradhan, D. R., Trivedi, K. and Arora, J. 2011. "Searching Online Resources in New Discovery Environment: A State-of-the-Art Review." In Proceedings of the 8th International CALIBER, March 2-4, 2011, Goa: Goa University. [online] [cited 2015. 12. 1.]
|
19 |
Sadeh, T. 2013. "From Search to Discovery." In Proceedings of IFLA WLIC 2013, Aug 19, 2013, Singapore. [online] [cited 2015. 7. 7.] .
|
20 |
Stohn, C. 2015. How Do Users Search and Discover?: Findings from Ex Libris User Research. Jerusalem: EX Libris. [online] [cited 2015. 8. 23.]
|