Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.1.377

The Study on Effective Factors of Reading Discussion for the Young Adults Program of A Local Children Care Center in Incheon  

Ahn, In-Ja (동원대학교 아동문헌정보과)
Youn, Youn-Seak (RWS 교육연구소(행복한 상상(주) 소속 토론리더연구회))
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / v.47, no.1, 2013 , pp. 377-398 More about this Journal
Abstract
The research has provided elementary and junior high school students at Children's Center in Incheon district and analyzed its effective factors in both educational and operational aspects. The educational factors in reading discussion include reading, writing, presenting, listening, and rethinking. In the result, the influential factors are as follows: the respondents' emotional intelligence, the level of reading completion, the level of sympathy with class participants, and the level of advance preference on reading. There are additional factors that have influences on the result, including suitability of topics, capabilities of leaders, selection of books, and combination of basic educational training, like speaking and writing.
Keywords
Book Discussion; Collaborative Problem-solving Debate; Pro and Con Debate; Youth Program; Book Discussion Model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 권희정. 2006. 자기주도적 사고력이 통합논술의 관건-독서토론수업으로 하는 논술공부. 중등 우리교육, 4(2): 126-141. (Kwon, Heejung. 2006. "selfdirected thought is the best for the essay writing-reading discussion is the tool for essay sriting." The Secondary Education, 4(2): 126-141.)
2 김승환. 2004. 독서토론의 활성화를 위한 독서자료 활용에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 35(3): 1-22. (Kim, Seung-Hoan. 2004. "A Study of the Reading Material Use on the Reading Discussion." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 35(3): 1-22.)   과학기술학회마을
3 김현주. 2011. 인문교양교육과 독서토론. 한국교양교육학회 학술대회 자료집, 2011년 5월, 151-165. 한국교양교육학회. (Kim, Hyun-Ju. 2011. "A Liberal Arts Education of Humanities and Reading Discussion." Korean Journal of General Education, 5(1): 151-165.)
4 노명완, 김라연. 2008. 웹 게시판을 이용한 독서 토론에서의 학습자 반응 양상 분석. 독서연구, 20: 171-199. 한국독서학회. (Noh, Myeong-Wan, & Kim, Ra-Yeon. 2008. "A study on Analysis of Leaner Responses in Web board-based Reading Discussions." Journal of reading research, 20: 171-199.)
5 서정혁. 2009. '찬반형 대립형 독서토론' 모형 연구. 독서연구, 21: 257-284. 한국독서학회. (Seo, Jeong-Hyok. 2009. "A Case Study on a Pro-Con Book Debate Model-Focusing on the Kyobo-Sookmyung Book Debate Model." Journal of reading research, 21: 257-284.)
6 신상규. 2008. 독서토론을 활용한 통합인문학 교육. 한국사고와표현학회 학술대회 논문집, 65-85. 한국사고와표현학회. (Shin, Sang-Geu. 2008. "Education of Humanities with book discussion." Proceeding of Thought and Expression Society, 65-85. Thought and Expression Society.)
7 이은주. 2010. 독서토론 활성화에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 교양교육연구, 4(2): 141-158. 한국교양교육학회. (Lee, Eun-Ju. 2010. "A study on factors affecting the activation of reading discussion in University." Korean Journal of General Education, 4(2): 141-158.)
8 이주영. 1999. 생각을 키워주는 독서토론. 초등 우리교육, 9: 140-145. (Lee, Ju-Young. 1999. "Reading discussion helps students think more." The Elementary Education, 9: 140-145.)
9 이황직. 2007. 개방형 논제 제시 독서토론 모형 연구. 독서연구, 17(2): 309-330. 한국독서학회. (Yi, Hwang-jik. 2007. "A Case Report on the Kyobo-Sookmyung Book Discussion Model." Journal of Reading Research, 17(2): 309-330.)
10 정종기. 2005. 면대면 독서토론과 웹기반 독서토론의 효과 비교. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 36(3): 291-312. 한국도서관․정보학회. (Jung, Jong-Kee. 2005. "Comparison on Effects of Face-to-face Reading Discussion and Web-based's." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 36(3): 291-312.)
11 정종기. 2006. 독서토론의 수행평가 도구 개발에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 37(1): 353-373. 한국도서관․정보학회. (Jung, Jong-Kee. 2006. "A Study on the Development of Performance Assessment Tool in Reading Debate." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 37(1): 353-373.)   과학기술학회마을
12 EBS제작팀. 2012. <아이의 정서지능>. 지식채널. p.324 부록; 정서지능 진단검사 성인용/초등학생용 사용. (EBS Production Team. 2012. "Emotional Intelligence of Children: A Supplement of the test of Emotional Intelligence for adults and primary students." The Channel of Knowledge, p.324.)
13 제이엠에듀사. 2010. Question & Play; About Qlay Card. (JM Edu. co. 2010. Question & Play; About Qlay Card.)
14 신문과 방송. 2001. 100만명 이상 시청, 28년간 문화대중화에 기여-프랑스의 TV독서토론프로그램 '브이용 드 뀔뒤르'. 2001년 5월. pp.69-73. (Newspaper & Broadcasting. May 2001. 69-73. "Over 1,000,000 people Watching TV Program, "Bouillon de Culture" Contribution to TV Book Discussion Program Becoming popular in France."