Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.2.261

The Study on the Directions of KCR4 under the New ICP 2009  

Lee, Mi-Hwa (공주대학교 사범대학 문헌정보교육과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / v.46, no.2, 2012 , pp. 261-280 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study seeks to replace PaRIS Principles and find directions of revising KCR4 by analyzing the international Cataloging Principles 2009(ICP 2009) established in the environment of Machine Readable Cataloging. ICP 2009 was reflected in cataloging rules such as RDA and ISBD 2010 as the minimal principles for uniformity in establishing each nation's cataloging rules. In contrary, KCR4 needs to be revised because it has never been changed after 2003, and has only description rules without any rules for the choice and forms of access points. Therefore, this study aims to grasp requirements that should be reflected in KCR4 through analyzing ICP 2009. In first step, it is to grasp the features of ICP 2009 by comparing PaRIS Principle and ICP 2009 and to compare KCR4 in aspects of ICP 2009. The detailed elements for comparison between ICP 2009 and KCR4 are scope, general principles, entitles, attributes, and relationships, objectives and functions of the catalogue, bibliographic description, access points, foundations for search capabilities as the contents of ICP 2009. As a result, this study could give some directions of KCR4 in the future. First, ISBD 2010 and conceptual models should be reflected in KCR4 in description. Second, it should regulate the authority access points in KCR4 based on ICP 2009. Third, it will describe essential access points of work and expression attributes in bibliographic records and authority records to find works and expression. This study will contribute to guide the national cataloging rules.
Keywords
ICP 2009; KCR4; PaRIS Principles; Access Point; Authorized Access Point; Variant Form of Name; FRBR; FRAD;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Creider, L. S. 2009b. "The development of the statement of the International Cataloging Principles." In IFLA Cataloguing Principles: The Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) and its Glossary. Munchen: Saur, 14-24.
2 Guerrini, M. 2009. "In praise of the un-finished: The IFLA statement of International Cataloguing Principles." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(8): 722-740.   DOI
3 ICCP. 1961. Statement of Principles. [online]. [cited 2011.7.28]. .
4 IME ICC. 2003. Statement of International Cataloguing Principles. [online]. [cited 2011.10.2]. .
5 IME ICC. 2009. Statement of International Cataloging Principles. [online]. [cited 2011.10.2]. .
6 IME ICC. 2011. IFLA Meetings of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code. [online]. [cited 2012.5.2]. .
7 Svenonius, E. 2000. Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
8 Taylor, A. G. & Joudrey, D. N. 2009. The Organization of Information. 3rd ed. London: Library Unlimited.
9 US RDA Test Coordinating Committee. 2011. Report and Recommendations of US RDA Test Coordinating Committee. [online]. [cited 2011.12.20]. .
10 이재선. 2009. 새로운 목록 원칙과 규칙: ICP, ISBD, RDA를 중심으로. 한국비블리아학회 발표논집, 21: 117-150.(Lee, Jae-Sun. 2009. "Saeloun moglok wonchikgwa gyuchik." Proceedings of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science Conference, 21: 117-150.)
11 이미화. 2011. AACR2에서 RDA로 목록규칙 변화에 따른 KCR4의 고려사항에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(1): 23-42.(Lee, Mihwa. 2011. "A study on considerations in KCR4 through changes of cataloging rules from AACR2 to RDA." Journal of the Korean Society for Information management, 28(1): 23-42.)
12 이창수. 2005. 한국목록규칙 4판에 반영된 목록의 유용성. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 36(3): 137-148.(Lee, Chang Soo. 2005. "An analysis of usability of the catalogue in the KCR4." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 36(3): 137-148.)
13 도태현. 2010. 도서관 목록에서 표목의 취급 실태에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 41(4): 171-189.(Doh, Tae-Hyeon. 2010. "A survey on the managing of headings in library cataloging." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(4): 171-189.)
14 한국도서관협회. 2003. 한국목록규칙 4판. 서울: 한국도서관협회.(Korean Library Association. 2003. Korean Cataloguing Rules. 4th ed. Seoul: Korean Library Association.)
15 Bianchini, C. & Guerrini, M. 2009. "From bibliographic models to cataloging rules: Remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(2): 105-124.   DOI
16 Creider, L. S. 2009a. "A comparison of the Paris Principles and the International Cataloguing Principles." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(6): 583-599.   DOI
17 Cataloguing Code Comparison for the IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code. 2003. Response submitted April 22, 2003. Draft. [online]. [cited 2011.12.20]. .
18 Cataloguing Code Comparison for the IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code. 2003. [online]. [cited 2011.12.20]. .